Remove BDFL sections
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
732b1560b4
commit
e36c1066fc
44
MAINTAINERS
44
MAINTAINERS
@ -50,10 +50,9 @@ maintainer candidates are selected and proposed on the maintainers mailing list.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
After a candidate has been announced on the maintainers mailing list, the
|
After a candidate has been announced on the maintainers mailing list, the
|
||||||
existing maintainers are given five business days to discuss the candidate,
|
existing maintainers are given five business days to discuss the candidate,
|
||||||
raise objections and cast their vote. Candidates must be approved by the BDFL
|
raise objections and cast their vote. Candidates must be approved by at least 66% of the current maintainers by adding their vote on the mailing
|
||||||
and at least 66% of the current maintainers by adding their vote on the mailing
|
|
||||||
list. Only maintainers of the repository that the candidate is proposed for are
|
list. Only maintainers of the repository that the candidate is proposed for are
|
||||||
allowed to vote. The BDFL's vote is mandatory.
|
allowed to vote.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If a candidate is approved, a maintainer will contact the candidate to invite
|
If a candidate is approved, a maintainer will contact the candidate to invite
|
||||||
the candidate to open a pull request that adds the contributor to the
|
the candidate to open a pull request that adds the contributor to the
|
||||||
@ -108,43 +107,12 @@ a maintainer. If the maintainer decides to step down as a maintainer, they
|
|||||||
open a pull request to be removed from the MAINTAINERS file.
|
open a pull request to be removed from the MAINTAINERS file.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the maintainer wants to remain a maintainer, but is unable to perform the
|
If the maintainer wants to remain a maintainer, but is unable to perform the
|
||||||
required duties they can be removed with a vote by the BDFL and at least 66% of
|
required duties they can be removed with a vote of at least 66% of
|
||||||
the current maintainers. The BDFL's vote is mandatory. An e-mail is sent to the
|
the current maintainers. An e-mail is sent to the
|
||||||
mailing list, inviting maintainers of the project to vote. The voting period is
|
mailing list, inviting maintainers of the project to vote. The voting period is
|
||||||
five business days. Issues related to a maintainer's performance should be
|
five business days. Issues related to a maintainer's performance should be
|
||||||
discussed with them among the other maintainers so that they are not surprised
|
discussed with them among the other maintainers so that they are not surprised
|
||||||
by a pull request removing them.
|
by a pull request removing them.
|
||||||
"""
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[Rules.bdfl]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
title = "The Benevolent dictator for life (BDFL)"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
text = """
|
|
||||||
containerd follows the timeless, highly efficient and totally unfair system
|
|
||||||
known as [Benevolent dictator for
|
|
||||||
life](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benevolent_Dictator_for_Life), with yours
|
|
||||||
truly, Solomon Hykes, in the role of BDFL. This means that all decisions are
|
|
||||||
made, by default, by Solomon. Since making every decision himself would be
|
|
||||||
highly un-scalable, in practice decisions are spread across multiple
|
|
||||||
maintainers.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Ideally, the BDFL role is like the Queen of England: awesome crown, but not an
|
|
||||||
actual operational role day-to-day. The real job of a BDFL is to NEVER GO AWAY.
|
|
||||||
Every other rule can change, perhaps drastically so, but the BDFL will always be
|
|
||||||
there, preserving the philosophy and principles of the project, and keeping
|
|
||||||
ultimate authority over its fate. This gives us great flexibility in
|
|
||||||
experimenting with various governance models, knowing that we can always press
|
|
||||||
the "reset" button without fear of fragmentation or deadlock. See the US
|
|
||||||
congress for a counter-example.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
BDFL daily routine:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Is the project governance stuck in a deadlock or irreversibly fragmented?
|
|
||||||
* If yes: refactor the project governance
|
|
||||||
* Are there issues or conflicts escalated by maintainers?
|
|
||||||
* If yes: resolve them
|
|
||||||
* Go back to polishing that crown.
|
|
||||||
"""
|
"""
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[Rules.decisions]
|
[Rules.decisions]
|
||||||
@ -214,10 +182,6 @@ made through a pull request.
|
|||||||
# Current project roles
|
# Current project roles
|
||||||
[Roles]
|
[Roles]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[Roles.bdfl]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
person = "shykes"
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[Roles."Chief Architect"]
|
[Roles."Chief Architect"]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
person = "crosbymichael"
|
person = "crosbymichael"
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user