github/containerd
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases 2 Wiki Activity

Proposed fix for image content store

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Nephin 2017-11-22 17:36:24 -05:00
parent a21a19a658
commit f6e877e8be
4 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
image.go
View File

@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ type Image interface {
Config(ctx context.Context) (ocispec.Descriptor, error)
// IsUnpacked returns whether or not an image is unpacked.
IsUnpacked(context.Context, string) (bool, error)
// ContentStore provides a content store which contains image blob data
ContentStore() content.Store
}
var _ = (Image)(&image{})
@ -166,3 +168,7 @@ func (i *image) getLayers(ctx context.Context, platform string) ([]rootfs.Layer,
}
return layers, nil
}
func (i *image) ContentStore() content.Store {
return i.client.ContentStore()
}

3
oci/client.go
View File

@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ import (
// Client interface used by SpecOpt
type Client interface {
SnapshotService(snapshotterName string) snapshot.Snapshotter
ContentStore() content.Store
}
// Image interface used by some SpecOpt to query image configuration
type Image interface {
// Config descriptor for the image.
Config(ctx context.Context) (ocispec.Descriptor, error)
// ContentStore provides a content store which contains image blob data
ContentStore() content.Store
}

8
oci/spec_opts_unix.go
View File

@ -67,12 +67,6 @@ func WithLinuxNamespace(ns specs.LinuxNamespace) SpecOpts {
// WithImageConfig configures the spec to from the configuration of an Image
func WithImageConfig(image Image) SpecOpts {
return func(ctx context.Context, client Client, c *containers.Container, s *specs.Spec) error {
store := client.ContentStore()
// TODO: needs review. Previous this passed in a store, now it's using
// a store that is part of the client. This makes the assumption that
// the client store is the same as the one wrapped by `image`.
// Is this assumption safe? Should the interface be changed to accept
// a store instead of wrapping one?
ic, err := image.Config(ctx)
if err != nil {
return err
@ -83,7 +77,7 @@ func WithImageConfig(image Image) SpecOpts {
)
switch ic.MediaType {
case v1.MediaTypeImageConfig, images.MediaTypeDockerSchema2Config:
p, err := content.ReadBlob(ctx, store, ic.Digest)
p, err := content.ReadBlob(ctx, image.ContentStore(), ic.Digest)
if err != nil {
return err
}

3
oci/spec_opts_windows.go
View File

@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ import (
// WithImageConfig configures the spec to from the configuration of an Image
func WithImageConfig(image Image) SpecOpts {
return func(ctx context.Context, client Client, _ *containers.Container, s *specs.Spec) error {
store := client.ContentStore()
ic, err := image.Config(ctx)
if err != nil {
return err
@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ func WithImageConfig(image Image) SpecOpts {
)
switch ic.MediaType {
case v1.MediaTypeImageConfig, images.MediaTypeDockerSchema2Config:
p, err := content.ReadBlob(ctx, store, ic.Digest)
p, err := content.ReadBlob(ctx, image.ContentStore(), ic.Digest)
if err != nil {
return err
}