We move from having our own generated version of the googleapis files to
an upstream version that is present in gogo. As part of this, we update
the protobuf package to 1.0 and make some corrections for slight
differences in the generated code.
The impact of this change is very low.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Because of a side-effect import, we have the possibility of pulling in
several unnecessary packages that are used by the plugin and not at
runtime to implement protobuf structures. Setting these imports to
`weak` prevents this from happening, reducing the total import set,
reducing memory usage and binary size.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
There were a few files printing warnings during the build due to
erroneous imports. These imports have now been removed.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This changes Wait() from returning an error whenever you call wait on a
stopped process/task to returning the exit status from the process.
This also adds the exit status to the Status() call on a process/task so
that a user can Wait(), check status, then cancel the wait to avoid
races in event handling.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
This moves the shim's API and protos out of the containerd services
package and into the linux runtime package. This is because the shim is
an implementation detail of the linux runtime that we have and it is not
a containerd user facing api.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
This allows attach of existing fifos to be done without any information
stored on the client side.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Working from feedback on the existing implementation, we have now
introduced a central metadata object to represent the lifecycle and pin
the resources required to implement what people today know as
containers. This includes the runtime specification and the root
filesystem snapshots. We also allow arbitrary labeling of the container.
Such provisions will bring the containerd definition of container closer
to what is expected by users.
The objects that encompass today's ContainerService, centered around the
runtime, will be known as tasks. These tasks take on the existing
lifecycle behavior of containerd's containers, which means that they are
deleted when they exit. Largely, there are no other changes except for
naming.
The `Container` object will operate purely as a metadata object. No
runtime state will be held on `Container`. It only informs the execution
service on what is required for creating tasks and the resources in use
by that container. The resources referenced by that container will be
deleted when the container is deleted, if not in use. In this sense,
users can create, list, label and delete containers in a similar way as
they do with docker today, without the complexity of runtime locks that
plagues current implementations.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
