Go 1.18 and up now provides a strings.Cut() which is better suited for
splitting key/value pairs (and similar constructs), and performs better:
```go
func BenchmarkSplit(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs()
data := []string{"12hello=world", "12hello=", "12=hello", "12hello"}
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
for _, s := range data {
_ = strings.SplitN(s, "=", 2)[0]
}
}
}
func BenchmarkCut(b *testing.B) {
b.ReportAllocs()
data := []string{"12hello=world", "12hello=", "12=hello", "12hello"}
for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
for _, s := range data {
_, _, _ = strings.Cut(s, "=")
}
}
}
```
BenchmarkSplit
BenchmarkSplit-10 8244206 128.0 ns/op 128 B/op 4 allocs/op
BenchmarkCut
BenchmarkCut-10 54411998 21.80 ns/op 0 B/op 0 allocs/op
While looking at occurrences of `strings.Split()`, I also updated some for alternatives,
or added some constraints; for cases where an specific number of items is expected, I used `strings.SplitN()`
with a suitable limit. This prevents (theoretical) unlimited splits.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Signed-off-by: Swagat Bora <sbora@amazon.com>
Add spans around image unpack operations
Use image.ref to denote image name and image.id for the image config digest
Add top-level spand and record errors in the CRI instrumentation service
This `//nolint` was added in f5c7ac9272
to suppress warnings about the `NameToCertificate` function being deprecated:
// Deprecated: NameToCertificate only allows associating a single certificate
// with a given name. Leave that field nil to let the library select the first
// compatible chain from Certificates.
Looking at that, it was deprecated in Go 1.14 through
eb93c684d4
(https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/205059), which describes:
crypto/tls: select only compatible chains from Certificates
Now that we have a full implementation of the logic to check certificate
compatibility, we can let applications just list multiple chains in
Certificates (for example, an RSA and an ECDSA one) and choose the most
appropriate automatically.
NameToCertificate only maps each name to one chain, so simply deprecate
it, and while at it simplify its implementation by not stripping
trailing dots from the SNI (which is specified not to have any, see RFC
6066, Section 3) and by not supporting multi-level wildcards, which are
not a thing in the WebPKI (and in crypto/x509).
We should at least have a comment describing why we are ignoring this, but preferably
review whether we should still use it.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
