Since Go 1.7, context is a standard package, superceding the
"x/net/context". Since Go 1.9, the latter only provides a few type
aliases from the former. Therefore, it makes sense to switch to the
standard package.
This commit was generated by the following script (with a couple of
minor fixups to remove extra changes done by goimports):
#!/bin/bash
if [ $# -ge 1 ]; then
FILES=$*
else
FILES=$(git ls-files \*.go | grep -vF ".pb.go" | grep -v
^vendor/)
fi
for f in $FILES; do
printf .
sed -i -e 's|"golang.org/x/net/context"$|"context"|' $f
goimports -w $f
awk ' /^$/ {e=1; next;}
/[[:space:]]"context"$/ {e=0;}
{if (e) {print ""; e=0}; print;}' < $f > $f.new && \
mv $f.new $f
goimports -w $f
done
echo
Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
The boltdb image store now manages its own transactions when
one is not provided, but allows the caller to pass in a
transaction through the context. This makes the image store
more similar to the content and snapshot stores. Additionally,
use the reference to the metadata database to mark the content
store as dirty after an image has been deleted. The deletion
of an image means a reference to a piece of content is gone
and therefore garbage collection should be run to check if
any resources can be cleaned up as a result.
Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcgstyle.net>
Synchronous image delete provides an option image delete to wait
until the next garbage collection deletes after an image is removed
before returning success to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcgstyle.net>
Add garbage collection as a background process and policy
configuration for configuring when to run garbage collection.
By default garbage collection will run when deletion occurs
and no more than 20ms out of every second.
Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcgstyle.net>
To avoid importing all of grpc when consuming events, the types of
events have been split in to a separate package. This should allow a
reduction in memory usage in cases where a package is consuming events
but not using the gprc service directly.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Since these are registered and the interface is what matters, these
Service types do not need to be exported.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
In the course of setting out to add filters and address some cleanup, it
was found that we had a few problems in the events subsystem that needed
addressing before moving forward.
The biggest change was to move to the more standard terminology of
publish and subscribe. We make this terminology change across the Go
interface and the GRPC API, making the behavior more familier. The
previous system was very context-oriented, which is no longer required.
With this, we've removed a large amount of dead and unneeded code. Event
transactions, context storage and the concept of `Poster` is gone. This
has been replaced in most places with a `Publisher`, which matches the
actual usage throughout the codebase, removing the need for helpers.
There are still some questions around the way events are handled in the
shim. Right now, we've preserved some of the existing bugs which may
require more extensive changes to resolve correctly.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
The primary feature we get with this PR is support for filters and
labels on the image metadata store. In the process of doing this, the
conventions for the API have been converged between containers and
images, providing a model for other services.
With images, `Put` (renamed to `Update` briefly) has been split into a
`Create` and `Update`, allowing one to control the behavior around these
operations. `Update` now includes support for masking fields at the
datastore-level across both the containers and image service. Filters
are now just string values to interpreted directly within the data
store. This should allow for some interesting future use cases in which
the datastore might use the syntax for more efficient query paths.
The containers service has been updated to follow these conventions as
closely as possible.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Now that we have most of the services required for use with containerd,
it was found that common patterns were used throughout services. By
defining a central `errdefs` package, we ensure that services will map
errors to and from grpc consistently and cleanly. One can decorate an
error with as much context as necessary, using `pkg/errors` and still
have the error mapped correctly via grpc.
We make a few sacrifices. At this point, the common errors we use across
the repository all map directly to grpc error codes. While this seems
positively crazy, it actually works out quite well. The error conditions
that were specific weren't super necessary and the ones that were
necessary now simply have better context information. We lose the
ability to add new codes, but this constraint may not be a bad thing.
Effectively, as long as one uses the errors defined in `errdefs`, the
error class will be mapped correctly across the grpc boundary and
everything will be good. If you don't use those definitions, the error
maps to "unknown" and the error message is preserved.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
When using events, it was found to be fairly unwieldy with a number of
extra packages. For the most part, when interacting with the events
service, we want types of the same version of the service. This has been
accomplished by moving all events types into the events package.
In addition, several fixes to the way events are marshaled have been
included. Specifically, we defer to the protobuf type registration
system to assemble events and type urls, with a little bit sheen on top
of add a containerd.io oriented namespace.
This has resulted in much cleaner event consumption and has removed the
reliance on error prone type urls, in favor of concrete types.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: update events package to include emitter and use envelope proto
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: add events service
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: enable events service and update ctr events to use events service
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
event listeners
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: helper func for emitting in services
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: improved cli for containers and tasks
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
create event envelope with poster
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: introspect event data to use for type url
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: use pb encoding; add event types
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: instrument content and snapshot services with events
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: instrument image service with events
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: instrument namespace service with events
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: add namespace support
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: only send events from namespace requested from client
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
events: switch to go-events for broadcasting
Signed-off-by: Evan Hazlett <ejhazlett@gmail.com>
The implementations for the storage of metadata have been merged into a
single metadata package where they can share storage primitives and
techniques. The is a requisite for the addition of namespaces, which
will require a coordinated layout for records to be organized by
namespace.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Working from feedback on the existing implementation, we have now
introduced a central metadata object to represent the lifecycle and pin
the resources required to implement what people today know as
containers. This includes the runtime specification and the root
filesystem snapshots. We also allow arbitrary labeling of the container.
Such provisions will bring the containerd definition of container closer
to what is expected by users.
The objects that encompass today's ContainerService, centered around the
runtime, will be known as tasks. These tasks take on the existing
lifecycle behavior of containerd's containers, which means that they are
deleted when they exit. Largely, there are no other changes except for
naming.
The `Container` object will operate purely as a metadata object. No
runtime state will be held on `Container`. It only informs the execution
service on what is required for creating tasks and the resources in use
by that container. The resources referenced by that container will be
deleted when the container is deleted, if not in use. In this sense,
users can create, list, label and delete containers in a similar way as
they do with docker today, without the complexity of runtime locks that
plagues current implementations.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
For some reason, when I wrote this, I forgot about the `View` and
`Update` helpers on boltdb. These are now used and makes the code much
easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Server and Client images of the image store are now provided. We have
created an image metadata interface and converted the bolt functions to
implement that interface over an transaction. A remote client
implementation is provided that implements the same interface.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
This is a first pass at the metadata required for supporting an image
store. We use a shallow approach to the problem, allowing this
component to centralize the naming. Resources for this image can then be
"snowballed" in for actual implementations. This is better understood
through example.
Let's take pull. One could register the name "docker.io/stevvooe/foo" as
pointing at a particular digest. When instructed to pull or fetch, the
system will notice that no components of that image are present locally.
It can then recursively resolve the resources for that image and fetch
them into the content store. Next time the instruction is issued, the
content will be present so no action will be taken.
Another example is preparing the rootfs. The requirements for a rootfs
can be resolved from a name. These "diff ids" will then be compared with
what is available in the snapshot manager. Any parts of the rootfs, such
as a layer, that isn't available in the snapshotter can be unpacked.
Once this process is satisified, the image will be runnable as a
container.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
