This fixes a few bugs in the container store related to reading and
writing fields. Specifically, on update, the full field set wasn't being
returned to the caller, making it appear that the store was corrupted.
We now return the correctly updated field and store the missing field
that was omitted in the original implementation. In course, we also have
defined the update semantics of each field, as well as whether or not
they are required.
The big addition here is really the container metadata testsuite. It
covers listing, filtering, creates, updates and deletes in a vareity of
scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
e.g. dist pull --snapshotter btrfs ...; ctr run --snapshotter btrfs ...
(empty string defaults for overlayfs)
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
The primary feature we get with this PR is support for filters and
labels on the image metadata store. In the process of doing this, the
conventions for the API have been converged between containers and
images, providing a model for other services.
With images, `Put` (renamed to `Update` briefly) has been split into a
`Create` and `Update`, allowing one to control the behavior around these
operations. `Update` now includes support for masking fields at the
datastore-level across both the containers and image service. Filters
are now just string values to interpreted directly within the data
store. This should allow for some interesting future use cases in which
the datastore might use the syntax for more efficient query paths.
The containers service has been updated to follow these conventions as
closely as possible.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
The implementations for the storage of metadata have been merged into a
single metadata package where they can share storage primitives and
techniques. The is a requisite for the addition of namespaces, which
will require a coordinated layout for records to be organized by
namespace.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
Working from feedback on the existing implementation, we have now
introduced a central metadata object to represent the lifecycle and pin
the resources required to implement what people today know as
containers. This includes the runtime specification and the root
filesystem snapshots. We also allow arbitrary labeling of the container.
Such provisions will bring the containerd definition of container closer
to what is expected by users.
The objects that encompass today's ContainerService, centered around the
runtime, will be known as tasks. These tasks take on the existing
lifecycle behavior of containerd's containers, which means that they are
deleted when they exit. Largely, there are no other changes except for
naming.
The `Container` object will operate purely as a metadata object. No
runtime state will be held on `Container`. It only informs the execution
service on what is required for creating tasks and the resources in use
by that container. The resources referenced by that container will be
deleted when the container is deleted, if not in use. In this sense,
users can create, list, label and delete containers in a similar way as
they do with docker today, without the complexity of runtime locks that
plagues current implementations.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
