The ability to handle KVM based runtimes with SELinux has been added as
part of d715d00906.
However, that commit introduced some logic to check whether the
"container_kvm_t" label would or not be present in the system, and while
the intentions were good, there's two major issues with the approach:
1. Inspecting "/etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/customizable_types" is not
the way to go, as it doesn't list the "container_kvm_t" at all.
2. There's no need to check for the label, as if the label is invalid an
"Invalid Label" error will be returned and that's it.
With those two in mind, let's simplify the logic behind setting the
"container_kvm_t" label, removing all the unnecessary code.
Here's an output of VMM process running, considering:
* The state before this patch:
```
$ containerd --version
containerd github.com/containerd/containerd v1.6.0-beta.3-88-g7fa44fc98 7fa44fc98f
$ kubectl apply -f ~/simple-pod.yaml
pod/nginx created
$ ps -auxZ | grep cloud-hypervisor
system_u:system_r:container_runtime_t:s0 root 609717 4.0 0.5 2987512 83588 ? Sl 08:32 0:00 /usr/bin/cloud-hypervisor --api-socket /run/vc/vm/be9d5cbabf440510d58d89fc8a8e77c27e96ddc99709ecaf5ab94c6b6b0d4c89/clh-api.sock
```
* The state after this patch:
```
$ containerd --version
containerd github.com/containerd/containerd v1.6.0-beta.3-89-ga5f2113c9 a5f2113c9fc15b19b2c364caaedb99c22de4eb32
$ kubectl apply -f ~/simple-pod.yaml
pod/nginx created
$ ps -auxZ | grep cloud-hypervisor
system_u:system_r:container_kvm_t:s0:c638,c999 root 614842 14.0 0.5 2987512 83228 ? Sl 08:40 0:00 /usr/bin/cloud-hypervisor --api-socket /run/vc/vm/f8ff838afdbe0a546f6995fe9b08e0956d0d0cdfe749705d7ce4618695baa68c/clh-api.sock
```
Note, the tests were performed using the following configuration snippet:
```
[plugins]
[plugins.cri]
enable_selinux = true
[plugins.cri.containerd]
[plugins.cri.containerd.runtimes]
[plugins.cri.containerd.runtimes.kata]
runtime_type = "io.containerd.kata.v2"
privileged_without_host_devices = true
```
And using the following pod yaml:
```
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: nginx
spec:
runtimeClassName: kata
containers:
- name: nginx
image: nginx:1.14.2
ports:
- containerPort: 80
```
Fixes: #6371
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano.fidencio@intel.com>
Use a PrefixFilter() to get only the mounts we're interested in,
which removes the need to manually filter mounts from the mountinfo
results.
Additional optimizations can be made, as:
> ... there's a little known fact that `umount(MNT_DETACH)` is actually
> recursive in Linux, IOW this function can be replaced with
> `unix.Umount(target, unix.MNT_DETACH)` (or `mount.UnmountAll(target, unix.MNT_DETACH)`
> (provided that target itself is a mount point).
e8fb2c392f (r535450446)
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
containerd is responsible for creating the log but there is no code to ensure
that the log dir exists. While kubelet should have created this there can be
times where this is not the case and this can cause stuck tasks.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <michael@thepasture.io>
recent versions of libcontainer/apparmor simplified the AppArmor
check to only check if the host supports AppArmor, but no longer
checks if apparmor_parser is installed, or if we're running
docker-in-docker;
bfb4ea1b1b
> The `apparmor_parser` binary is not really required for a system to run
> AppArmor from a runc perspective. How to apply the profile is more in
> the responsibility of higher level runtimes like Podman and Docker,
> which may do the binary check on their own.
This patch copies the logic from libcontainer/apparmor, and
restores the additional checks.
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
