`"golang.org/x/sys/unix"` support epoll on arm64
with 324e137580
There is no need a C implementation of epoll on arm64.
Signed-off-by: Lei Jitang <leijitang@huawei.com>
This commit added a build chapter into the doc to explain how to compile
`containerd` binaries via Docker container.
I did that after a discussion on Slack. For some reason in my Ubuntu
16.10 I am not able to build containerd. It's probably some trick mess
that I created (I am super powerful on these things).o
But it can be useful for other people like me!
Signed-off-by: Gianluca Arbezzano <gianarb92@gmail.com>
This avoids issues with the various deferred error handlers in the event that
`err` is shadowed or named differently, which this function currently avoids
but which is an easy trap to fall into.
Since named return values are all or nothing we need to name the waitGroup too
and adjust the code to suite.
Thanks to Aaron Lehmann for the suggestion, see also
https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/pull/1965#discussion_r118137410
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@docker.com>
Split resolver to only return a name with separate methods
for getting a fetcher and pusher. Add implementation for
push.
Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcgstyle.net>
Working from feedback on the existing implementation, we have now
introduced a central metadata object to represent the lifecycle and pin
the resources required to implement what people today know as
containers. This includes the runtime specification and the root
filesystem snapshots. We also allow arbitrary labeling of the container.
Such provisions will bring the containerd definition of container closer
to what is expected by users.
The objects that encompass today's ContainerService, centered around the
runtime, will be known as tasks. These tasks take on the existing
lifecycle behavior of containerd's containers, which means that they are
deleted when they exit. Largely, there are no other changes except for
naming.
The `Container` object will operate purely as a metadata object. No
runtime state will be held on `Container`. It only informs the execution
service on what is required for creating tasks and the resources in use
by that container. The resources referenced by that container will be
deleted when the container is deleted, if not in use. In this sense,
users can create, list, label and delete containers in a similar way as
they do with docker today, without the complexity of runtime locks that
plagues current implementations.
Signed-off-by: Stephen J Day <stephen.day@docker.com>
