deps: update runc to 1.1.0
This updates vendored runc/libcontainer to 1.1.0, and google/cadvisor to a version updated to runc 1.1.0 (google/cadvisor#3048). Changes in vendor are generated by (roughly): ./hack/pin-dependency.sh github.com/google/cadvisor v0.44.0 ./hack/pin-dependency.sh github.com/opencontainers/runc v1.1.0 ./hack/update-vendor.sh ./hack/lint-dependencies.sh # And follow all its recommendations. ./hack/update-vendor.sh ./hack/update-internal-modules.sh ./hack/lint-dependencies.sh # Re-check everything again. Co-Authored-By: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
128
vendor/github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/CONTRIBUTING.md
generated
vendored
Normal file
128
vendor/github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/CONTRIBUTING.md
generated
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
||||
How to Submit Patches to the libseccomp Project
|
||||
===============================================================================
|
||||
https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang
|
||||
|
||||
This document is intended to act as a guide to help you contribute to the
|
||||
libseccomp project. It is not perfect, and there will always be exceptions
|
||||
to the rules described here, but by following the instructions below you
|
||||
should have a much easier time getting your work merged with the upstream
|
||||
project.
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Your Code Using Existing Tests
|
||||
|
||||
There are two possible tests you can run to verify your code. The first
|
||||
test is used to check the formatting and coding style of your changes, you
|
||||
can run the test with the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
# make check-syntax
|
||||
|
||||
... if there are any problems with your changes a diff/patch will be shown
|
||||
which indicates the problems and how to fix them.
|
||||
|
||||
The second possible test is used to ensure the sanity of your code changes
|
||||
and to test these changes against the included tests. You can run the test
|
||||
with the following command:
|
||||
|
||||
# make check
|
||||
|
||||
... if there are any faults or errors they will be displayed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Add New Tests for New Functionality
|
||||
|
||||
Any submissions which add functionality, or significantly change the existing
|
||||
code, should include additional tests to verify the proper operation of the
|
||||
proposed changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Explain Your Work
|
||||
|
||||
At the top of every patch you should include a description of the problem you
|
||||
are trying to solve, how you solved it, and why you chose the solution you
|
||||
implemented. If you are submitting a bug fix, it is also incredibly helpful
|
||||
if you can describe/include a reproducer for the problem in the description as
|
||||
well as instructions on how to test for the bug and verify that it has been
|
||||
fixed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sign Your Work
|
||||
|
||||
The sign-off is a simple line at the end of the patch description, which
|
||||
certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right to pass it on as an
|
||||
open-source patch. The "Developer's Certificate of Origin" pledge is taken
|
||||
from the Linux Kernel and the rules are pretty simple:
|
||||
|
||||
Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1
|
||||
|
||||
By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
|
||||
|
||||
(a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
|
||||
have the right to submit it under the open source license
|
||||
indicated in the file; or
|
||||
|
||||
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
|
||||
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
|
||||
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
|
||||
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
|
||||
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
|
||||
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
|
||||
in the file; or
|
||||
|
||||
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
|
||||
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
(d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution
|
||||
are public and that a record of the contribution (including all
|
||||
personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off) is
|
||||
maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent with
|
||||
this project or the open source license(s) involved.
|
||||
|
||||
... then you just add a line to the bottom of your patch description, with
|
||||
your real name, saying:
|
||||
|
||||
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
|
||||
|
||||
You can add this to your commit description in `git` with `git commit -s`
|
||||
|
||||
## Post Your Patches Upstream
|
||||
|
||||
The libseccomp project accepts both GitHub pull requests and patches sent via
|
||||
the mailing list. GitHub pull requests are preferred. This sections below
|
||||
explain how to contribute via either method. Please read each step and perform
|
||||
all steps that apply to your chosen contribution method.
|
||||
|
||||
### Submitting via Email
|
||||
|
||||
Depending on how you decided to work with the libseccomp code base and what
|
||||
tools you are using there are different ways to generate your patch(es).
|
||||
However, regardless of what tools you use, you should always generate your
|
||||
patches using the "unified" diff/patch format and the patches should always
|
||||
apply to the libseccomp source tree using the following command from the top
|
||||
directory of the libseccomp sources:
|
||||
|
||||
# patch -p1 < changes.patch
|
||||
|
||||
If you are not using git, stacked git (stgit), or some other tool which can
|
||||
generate patch files for you automatically, you may find the following command
|
||||
helpful in generating patches, where "libseccomp.orig/" is the unmodified
|
||||
source code directory and "libseccomp/" is the source code directory with your
|
||||
changes:
|
||||
|
||||
# diff -purN libseccomp.orig/ libseccomp/
|
||||
|
||||
When in doubt please generate your patch and try applying it to an unmodified
|
||||
copy of the libseccomp sources; if it fails for you, it will fail for the rest
|
||||
of us.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, you will need to email your patches to the mailing list so they can
|
||||
be reviewed and potentially merged into the main libseccomp repository. When
|
||||
sending patches to the mailing list it is important to send your email in text
|
||||
form, no HTML mail please, and ensure that your email client does not mangle
|
||||
your patches. It should be possible to save your raw email to disk and apply
|
||||
it directly to the libseccomp source code; if that fails then you likely have
|
||||
a problem with your email client. When in doubt try a test first by sending
|
||||
yourself an email with your patch and attempting to apply the emailed patch to
|
||||
the libseccomp repository; if it fails for you, it will fail for the rest of
|
||||
us trying to test your patch and include it in the main libseccomp repository.
|
||||
|
||||
### Submitting via GitHub
|
||||
|
||||
See [this guide](https://help.github.com/en/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request) if you've never done this before.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user