added better matching for PV access modes

This commit is contained in:
markturansky
2015-07-13 15:10:04 -04:00
parent 650bf71cf7
commit 0b6030f50c
7 changed files with 337 additions and 54 deletions

View File

@@ -216,6 +216,136 @@ func TestSort(t *testing.T) {
}
}
func TestAllPossibleAccessModes(t *testing.T) {
index := NewPersistentVolumeOrderedIndex()
for _, pv := range createTestVolumes() {
index.Add(pv)
}
// the mock PVs creates contain 2 types of accessmodes: RWO+ROX and RWO+ROW+RWX
possibleModes := index.allPossibleMatchingAccessModes([]api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadWriteOnce})
if len(possibleModes) != 2 {
t.Errorf("Expected 2 arrays of modes that match RWO, but got %v", len(possibleModes))
}
for _, m := range possibleModes {
if !contains(m, api.ReadWriteOnce) {
t.Errorf("AccessModes does not contain %s", api.ReadWriteOnce)
}
}
possibleModes = index.allPossibleMatchingAccessModes([]api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadWriteMany})
if len(possibleModes) != 1 {
t.Errorf("Expected 1 array of modes that match RWX, but got %v", len(possibleModes))
}
if !contains(possibleModes[0], api.ReadWriteMany) {
t.Errorf("AccessModes does not contain %s", api.ReadWriteOnce)
}
}
func TestFindingVolumeWithDifferentAccessModes(t *testing.T) {
gce := &api.PersistentVolume{
ObjectMeta: api.ObjectMeta{UID: "001", Name: "gce"},
Spec: api.PersistentVolumeSpec{
Capacity: api.ResourceList{api.ResourceName(api.ResourceStorage): resource.MustParse("10G")},
PersistentVolumeSource: api.PersistentVolumeSource{GCEPersistentDisk: &api.GCEPersistentDiskVolumeSource{}},
AccessModes: []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{
api.ReadWriteOnce,
api.ReadOnlyMany,
},
},
}
ebs := &api.PersistentVolume{
ObjectMeta: api.ObjectMeta{UID: "002", Name: "ebs"},
Spec: api.PersistentVolumeSpec{
Capacity: api.ResourceList{api.ResourceName(api.ResourceStorage): resource.MustParse("10G")},
PersistentVolumeSource: api.PersistentVolumeSource{AWSElasticBlockStore: &api.AWSElasticBlockStoreVolumeSource{}},
AccessModes: []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{
api.ReadWriteOnce,
},
},
}
nfs := &api.PersistentVolume{
ObjectMeta: api.ObjectMeta{UID: "003", Name: "nfs"},
Spec: api.PersistentVolumeSpec{
Capacity: api.ResourceList{api.ResourceName(api.ResourceStorage): resource.MustParse("10G")},
PersistentVolumeSource: api.PersistentVolumeSource{NFS: &api.NFSVolumeSource{}},
AccessModes: []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{
api.ReadWriteOnce,
api.ReadOnlyMany,
api.ReadWriteMany,
},
},
}
claim := &api.PersistentVolumeClaim{
ObjectMeta: api.ObjectMeta{
Name: "claim01",
Namespace: "myns",
},
Spec: api.PersistentVolumeClaimSpec{
AccessModes: []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadWriteOnce},
Resources: api.ResourceRequirements{Requests: api.ResourceList{api.ResourceName(api.ResourceStorage): resource.MustParse("1G")}},
},
}
index := NewPersistentVolumeOrderedIndex()
index.Add(gce)
index.Add(ebs)
index.Add(nfs)
volume, _ := index.FindBestMatchForClaim(claim)
if volume.Name != ebs.Name {
t.Errorf("Expected %s but got volume %s instead", ebs.Name, volume.Name)
}
claim.Spec.AccessModes = []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadWriteOnce, api.ReadOnlyMany}
volume, _ = index.FindBestMatchForClaim(claim)
if volume.Name != gce.Name {
t.Errorf("Expected %s but got volume %s instead", gce.Name, volume.Name)
}
// order of the requested modes should not matter
claim.Spec.AccessModes = []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadWriteMany, api.ReadWriteOnce, api.ReadOnlyMany}
volume, _ = index.FindBestMatchForClaim(claim)
if volume.Name != nfs.Name {
t.Errorf("Expected %s but got volume %s instead", nfs.Name, volume.Name)
}
// fewer modes requested should still match
claim.Spec.AccessModes = []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadWriteMany}
volume, _ = index.FindBestMatchForClaim(claim)
if volume.Name != nfs.Name {
t.Errorf("Expected %s but got volume %s instead", nfs.Name, volume.Name)
}
// pretend the exact match is bound. should get the next level up of modes.
ebs.Spec.ClaimRef = &api.ObjectReference{}
claim.Spec.AccessModes = []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadWriteOnce}
volume, _ = index.FindBestMatchForClaim(claim)
if volume.Name != gce.Name {
t.Errorf("Expected %s but got volume %s instead", gce.Name, volume.Name)
}
// continue up the levels of modes.
gce.Spec.ClaimRef = &api.ObjectReference{}
claim.Spec.AccessModes = []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadWriteOnce}
volume, _ = index.FindBestMatchForClaim(claim)
if volume.Name != nfs.Name {
t.Errorf("Expected %s but got volume %s instead", nfs.Name, volume.Name)
}
// partial mode request
gce.Spec.ClaimRef = nil
claim.Spec.AccessModes = []api.PersistentVolumeAccessMode{api.ReadOnlyMany}
volume, _ = index.FindBestMatchForClaim(claim)
if volume.Name != gce.Name {
t.Errorf("Expected %s but got volume %s instead", gce.Name, volume.Name)
}
}
func createTestVolumes() []*api.PersistentVolume {
// these volumes are deliberately out-of-order to test indexing and sorting
return []*api.PersistentVolume{