generated

pkg/apis/policy/v1/zz_generated.conversion.go

@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ func autoConvert_v1_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec_To_policy_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec(in
 	out.MinAvailable = (*intstr.IntOrString)(unsafe.Pointer(in.MinAvailable))
 	out.Selector = (*metav1.LabelSelector)(unsafe.Pointer(in.Selector))
 	out.MaxUnavailable = (*intstr.IntOrString)(unsafe.Pointer(in.MaxUnavailable))
+	out.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = (*policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType)(unsafe.Pointer(in.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy))
 	return nil
 }
 
@@ -199,6 +200,7 @@ func autoConvert_policy_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec_To_v1_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec(in
 	out.MinAvailable = (*intstr.IntOrString)(unsafe.Pointer(in.MinAvailable))
 	out.Selector = (*metav1.LabelSelector)(unsafe.Pointer(in.Selector))
 	out.MaxUnavailable = (*intstr.IntOrString)(unsafe.Pointer(in.MaxUnavailable))
+	out.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = (*v1.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType)(unsafe.Pointer(in.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy))
 	return nil
 }
 

pkg/apis/policy/v1beta1/zz_generated.conversion.go

@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ func autoConvert_v1beta1_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec_To_policy_PodDisruptionBudgetSp
 	out.MinAvailable = (*intstr.IntOrString)(unsafe.Pointer(in.MinAvailable))
 	out.Selector = (*v1.LabelSelector)(unsafe.Pointer(in.Selector))
 	out.MaxUnavailable = (*intstr.IntOrString)(unsafe.Pointer(in.MaxUnavailable))
+	out.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = (*policy.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType)(unsafe.Pointer(in.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy))
 	return nil
 }
 
@@ -464,6 +465,7 @@ func autoConvert_policy_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec_To_v1beta1_PodDisruptionBudgetSp
 	out.MinAvailable = (*intstr.IntOrString)(unsafe.Pointer(in.MinAvailable))
 	out.Selector = (*v1.LabelSelector)(unsafe.Pointer(in.Selector))
 	out.MaxUnavailable = (*intstr.IntOrString)(unsafe.Pointer(in.MaxUnavailable))
+	out.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy = (*v1beta1.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType)(unsafe.Pointer(in.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy))
 	return nil
 }
 

pkg/apis/policy/zz_generated.deepcopy.go

@@ -239,6 +239,11 @@ func (in *PodDisruptionBudgetSpec) DeepCopyInto(out *PodDisruptionBudgetSpec) {
 		*out = new(intstr.IntOrString)
 		**out = **in
 	}
+	if in.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy != nil {
+		in, out := &in.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy, &out.UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy
+		*out = new(UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicyType)
+		**out = **in
+	}
 	return
 }
 

pkg/generated/openapi/zz_generated.openapi.go

@@ -38172,6 +38172,13 @@ func schema_k8sio_api_policy_v1_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec(ref common.ReferenceCall
 							Ref:         ref("k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/intstr.IntOrString"),
 						},
 					},
+					"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": {
+						SchemaProps: spec.SchemaProps{
+							Description: "UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type=\"Ready\",status=\"True\".\n\nValid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.\n\nIfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAdditional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.\n\nThis field is alpha-level. The eviction API uses this field when the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (disabled by default).",
+							Type:        []string{"string"},
+							Format:      "",
+						},
+					},
 				},
 			},
 		},
@@ -38609,6 +38616,13 @@ func schema_k8sio_api_policy_v1beta1_PodDisruptionBudgetSpec(ref common.Referenc
 							Ref:         ref("k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/intstr.IntOrString"),
 						},
 					},
+					"unhealthyPodEvictionPolicy": {
+						SchemaProps: spec.SchemaProps{
+							Description: "UnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy defines the criteria for when unhealthy pods should be considered for eviction. Current implementation considers healthy pods, as pods that have status.conditions item with type=\"Ready\",status=\"True\".\n\nValid policies are IfHealthyBudget and AlwaysAllow. If no policy is specified, the default behavior will be used, which corresponds to the IfHealthyBudget policy.\n\nIfHealthyBudget policy means that running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy can be evicted only if the guarded application is not disrupted (status.currentHealthy is at least equal to status.desiredHealthy). Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAlwaysAllow policy means that all running pods (status.phase=\"Running\"), but not yet healthy are considered disrupted and can be evicted regardless of whether the criteria in a PDB is met. This means perspective running pods of a disrupted application might not get a chance to become healthy. Healthy pods will be subject to the PDB for eviction.\n\nAdditional policies may be added in the future. Clients making eviction decisions should disallow eviction of unhealthy pods if they encounter an unrecognized policy in this field.\n\nThis field is alpha-level. The eviction API uses this field when the feature gate PDBUnhealthyPodEvictionPolicy is enabled (disabled by default).",
+							Type:        []string{"string"},
+							Format:      "",
+						},
+					},
 				},
 			},
 		},