Merge pull request #58229 from sjenning/exempt-sandbox-image
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58422, 58229, 58421, 58435, 58475). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>. kubelet: imagegc: exempt sandbox image The image GC logic currently does not consider the sandbox image to be in-use by pods, since it isn't explicitly listed in the pod spec. However, it is trivially in-use if there are any pods running on the node. This change adds logic to exempt the sandbox image from GC by always considering it as in-use. **Reviewer Note** I am changing `(m *kubeGenericRuntimeManager) GetImageRef` to return the ID always rather than the first tag if it exists. Seemed ok to me. Makes some error messages a little less readable in that the ID will be printed and not the tag. Just wanted to see what reviewers think about this. @derekwaynecarr @dashpole
This commit is contained in:
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ func newTestKubeletWithImageList(
|
||||
HighThresholdPercent: 90,
|
||||
LowThresholdPercent: 80,
|
||||
}
|
||||
imageGCManager, err := images.NewImageGCManager(fakeRuntime, kubelet.StatsProvider, fakeRecorder, fakeNodeRef, fakeImageGCPolicy)
|
||||
imageGCManager, err := images.NewImageGCManager(fakeRuntime, kubelet.StatsProvider, fakeRecorder, fakeNodeRef, fakeImageGCPolicy, "")
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
kubelet.imageManager = &fakeImageGCManager{
|
||||
fakeImageService: fakeRuntime,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user