Merge pull request #8366 from justinsb/idempotent_loadbalancer
Make LoadBalancer creation more self-healing; don't delete on AWS
This commit is contained in:
@@ -586,21 +586,15 @@ var _ = Describe("Services", func() {
|
||||
if len(service.Status.LoadBalancer.Ingress) != 1 {
|
||||
Failf("got unexpected len(Status.LoadBalancer.Ingresss) for NodePort service: %v", service)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Make this less of a hack. Watch for events?
|
||||
Logf("Waiting 2 minutes to give service time to settle after changing configuration")
|
||||
time.Sleep(time.Second * 120)
|
||||
service, err = waitForLoadBalancerIngress(f.Client, serviceName, f.Namespace.Name)
|
||||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
|
||||
|
||||
ingress2 := service.Status.LoadBalancer.Ingress[0]
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Fix the issue here: http://issue.k8s.io/11002
|
||||
if providerIs("aws") {
|
||||
// TODO: Make this less of a hack (or fix the underlying bug)
|
||||
time.Sleep(time.Second * 120)
|
||||
service, err = waitForLoadBalancerIngress(f.Client, serviceName, f.Namespace.Name)
|
||||
Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred())
|
||||
|
||||
// We don't want the ingress point to change, but we should verify that the new ingress point still works
|
||||
ingress2 = service.Status.LoadBalancer.Ingress[0]
|
||||
Expect(ingress1).NotTo(Equal(ingress2))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Expect(ingress1).To(Equal(ingress2))
|
||||
}
|
||||
Expect(ingress1).To(Equal(ingress2))
|
||||
|
||||
By("hitting the pod through the service's updated NodePort")
|
||||
testReachable(ip, nodePort2)
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user