Merge pull request #34543 from ivan4th/dont-require-failure-domains-for-pod-affinity-checker

Automatic merge from submit-queue

Don't require failureDomains in PodAffinityChecker

`failureDomains` are only used for `PreferredDuringScheduling` pod
anti-affinity, which is ignored by `PodAffinityChecker`.
This unnecessary requirement was making it hard to move
`PodAffinityChecker` to `GeneralPredicates` because that would require
passing `--failure-domains` to both `kubelet` and `kube-controller-manager`.
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Submit Queue
2017-01-30 08:18:32 -08:00
committed by GitHub
5 changed files with 29 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ go_test(
deps = [
"//pkg/api/v1:go_default_library",
"//plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm:go_default_library",
"//plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm/priorities/util:go_default_library",
"//plugin/pkg/scheduler/schedulercache:go_default_library",
"//vendor:k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource",
"//vendor:k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1",

View File

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ limitations under the License.
package predicates
import (
"errors"
"fmt"
"math/rand"
"strconv"
@@ -876,14 +877,12 @@ func GeneralPredicates(pod *v1.Pod, meta interface{}, nodeInfo *schedulercache.N
type PodAffinityChecker struct {
info NodeInfo
podLister algorithm.PodLister
failureDomains priorityutil.Topologies
}
func NewPodAffinityPredicate(info NodeInfo, podLister algorithm.PodLister, failureDomains []string) algorithm.FitPredicate {
func NewPodAffinityPredicate(info NodeInfo, podLister algorithm.PodLister) algorithm.FitPredicate {
checker := &PodAffinityChecker{
info: info,
podLister: podLister,
failureDomains: priorityutil.Topologies{DefaultKeys: failureDomains},
}
return checker.InterPodAffinityMatches
}
@@ -915,11 +914,14 @@ func (c *PodAffinityChecker) InterPodAffinityMatches(pod *v1.Pod, meta interface
return true, nil, nil
}
// AnyPodMatchesPodAffinityTerm checks if any of given pods can match the specific podAffinityTerm.
// anyPodMatchesPodAffinityTerm checks if any of given pods can match the specific podAffinityTerm.
// First return value indicates whether a matching pod exists on a node that matches the topology key,
// while the second return value indicates whether a matching pod exists anywhere.
// TODO: Do we really need any pod matching, or all pods matching? I think the latter.
func (c *PodAffinityChecker) anyPodMatchesPodAffinityTerm(pod *v1.Pod, allPods []*v1.Pod, node *v1.Node, term *v1.PodAffinityTerm) (bool, bool, error) {
if len(term.TopologyKey) == 0 {
return false, false, errors.New("Empty topologyKey is not allowed except for PreferredDuringScheduling pod anti-affinity")
}
matchingPodExists := false
namespaces := priorityutil.GetNamespacesFromPodAffinityTerm(pod, term)
selector, err := metav1.LabelSelectorAsSelector(term.LabelSelector)
@@ -934,7 +936,7 @@ func (c *PodAffinityChecker) anyPodMatchesPodAffinityTerm(pod *v1.Pod, allPods [
if err != nil {
return false, matchingPodExists, err
}
if c.failureDomains.NodesHaveSameTopologyKey(node, existingPodNode, term.TopologyKey) {
if priorityutil.NodesHaveSameTopologyKey(node, existingPodNode, term.TopologyKey) {
return true, matchingPodExists, nil
}
}
@@ -1067,7 +1069,11 @@ func (c *PodAffinityChecker) satisfiesExistingPodsAntiAffinity(pod *v1.Pod, meta
}
}
for _, term := range matchingTerms {
if c.failureDomains.NodesHaveSameTopologyKey(node, term.node, term.term.TopologyKey) {
if len(term.term.TopologyKey) == 0 {
glog.V(10).Infof("Empty topologyKey is not allowed except for PreferredDuringScheduling pod anti-affinity")
return false
}
if priorityutil.NodesHaveSameTopologyKey(node, term.node, term.term.TopologyKey) {
glog.V(10).Infof("Cannot schedule pod %+v onto node %v,because of PodAntiAffinityTerm %v",
podName(pod), node.Name, term.term)
return false

View File

@@ -19,14 +19,12 @@ package predicates
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
"strings"
"testing"
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource"
metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/api/v1"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm"
priorityutil "k8s.io/kubernetes/plugin/pkg/scheduler/algorithm/priorities/util"
"k8s.io/kubernetes/plugin/pkg/scheduler/schedulercache"
)
@@ -2574,7 +2572,6 @@ func TestInterPodAffinity(t *testing.T) {
fit := PodAffinityChecker{
info: FakeNodeInfo(*node),
podLister: algorithm.FakePodLister(test.pods),
failureDomains: priorityutil.Topologies{DefaultKeys: strings.Split(v1.DefaultFailureDomains, ",")},
}
nodeInfo := schedulercache.NewNodeInfo(podsOnNode...)
nodeInfo.SetNode(test.node)
@@ -2904,7 +2901,6 @@ func TestInterPodAffinityWithMultipleNodes(t *testing.T) {
testFit := PodAffinityChecker{
info: nodeListInfo,
podLister: algorithm.FakePodLister(test.pods),
failureDomains: priorityutil.Topologies{DefaultKeys: strings.Split(v1.DefaultFailureDomains, ",")},
}
nodeInfo := schedulercache.NewNodeInfo(podsOnNode...)
nodeInfo.SetNode(&node)

View File

@@ -49,8 +49,12 @@ func PodMatchesTermsNamespaceAndSelector(pod *v1.Pod, namespaces sets.String, se
return true
}
// nodesHaveSameTopologyKeyInternal checks if nodeA and nodeB have same label value with given topologyKey as label key.
func nodesHaveSameTopologyKeyInternal(nodeA, nodeB *v1.Node, topologyKey string) bool {
// NodesHaveSameTopologyKey checks if nodeA and nodeB have same label value with given topologyKey as label key.
// Returns false if topologyKey is empty.
func NodesHaveSameTopologyKey(nodeA, nodeB *v1.Node, topologyKey string) bool {
if len(topologyKey) == 0 {
return false
}
return nodeA.Labels != nil && nodeB.Labels != nil && len(nodeA.Labels[topologyKey]) > 0 && nodeA.Labels[topologyKey] == nodeB.Labels[topologyKey]
}
@@ -64,12 +68,12 @@ func (tps *Topologies) NodesHaveSameTopologyKey(nodeA, nodeB *v1.Node, topologyK
if len(topologyKey) == 0 {
// assumes this is allowed only for PreferredDuringScheduling pod anti-affinity (ensured by api/validation)
for _, defaultKey := range tps.DefaultKeys {
if nodesHaveSameTopologyKeyInternal(nodeA, nodeB, defaultKey) {
if NodesHaveSameTopologyKey(nodeA, nodeB, defaultKey) {
return true
}
}
return false
} else {
return nodesHaveSameTopologyKeyInternal(nodeA, nodeB, topologyKey)
return NodesHaveSameTopologyKey(nodeA, nodeB, topologyKey)
}
}

View File

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ func defaultPredicates() sets.String {
factory.RegisterFitPredicateFactory(
"MatchInterPodAffinity",
func(args factory.PluginFactoryArgs) algorithm.FitPredicate {
return predicates.NewPodAffinityPredicate(args.NodeInfo, args.PodLister, args.FailureDomains)
return predicates.NewPodAffinityPredicate(args.NodeInfo, args.PodLister)
},
),