Merge pull request #7704 from smarterclayton/parallel_allocator
Use etcd to allocate PortalIPs instead of in-mem
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1915,3 +1915,24 @@ type SELinuxOptions struct {
|
||||
// SELinux level label.
|
||||
Level string `json:"level,omitempty" description:"the level label to apply to the container"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// RangeAllocation is an opaque API object (not exposed to end users) that can be persisted to record
|
||||
// the global allocation state of the cluster. The schema of Range and Data generic, in that Range
|
||||
// should be a string representation of the inputs to a range (for instance, for IP allocation it
|
||||
// might be a CIDR) and Data is an opaque blob understood by an allocator which is typically a
|
||||
// binary range. Consumers should use annotations to record additional information (schema version,
|
||||
// data encoding hints). A range allocation should *ALWAYS* be recreatable at any time by observation
|
||||
// of the cluster, thus the object is less strongly typed than most.
|
||||
type RangeAllocation struct {
|
||||
TypeMeta `json:",inline"`
|
||||
ObjectMeta `json:"metadata,omitempty"`
|
||||
// A string representing a unique label for a range of resources, such as a CIDR "10.0.0.0/8" or
|
||||
// port range "10000-30000". Range is not strongly schema'd here. The Range is expected to define
|
||||
// a start and end unless there is an implicit end.
|
||||
Range string `json:"range"`
|
||||
// A byte array representing the serialized state of a range allocation. Additional clarifiers on
|
||||
// the type or format of data should be represented with annotations. For IP allocations, this is
|
||||
// represented as a bit array starting at the base IP of the CIDR in Range, with each bit representing
|
||||
// a single allocated address (the fifth bit on CIDR 10.0.0.0/8 is 10.0.0.4).
|
||||
Data []byte `json:"data"`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user