Merge pull request #47987 from wongma7/reclaimpolicy

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49869, 47987, 50211, 50804, 50583)

Add ReclaimPolicy field to StorageClass

fix https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/38192, enough people want this imo so going ahead and adding it according to initial suggested design

some considerations:
* No Recycle allowed, Retain (& Delete) only.
* Do we need to gate the field.
* E2E test where a Retain PV is dynamically provisioned is TODO if we agree we want this & this is the way to do it.
* Need a feature repo issue to track docs and stuff for 1.8

**Release note**:

```release-note
StorageClass has a new field to configure reclaim policy of dynamically provisioned PVs.
```

api/openapi-spec/swagger.json

@@ -64235,6 +64235,10 @@
      "provisioner": {
       "description": "Provisioner indicates the type of the provisioner.",
       "type": "string"
+     },
+     "reclaimPolicy": {
+      "description": "Dynamically provisioned PersistentVolumes of this storage class are created with this reclaimPolicy. Defaults to Delete.",
+      "type": "string"
      }
     },
     "x-kubernetes-group-version-kind": [
@@ -64307,6 +64311,10 @@
      "provisioner": {
       "description": "Provisioner indicates the type of the provisioner.",
       "type": "string"
+     },
+     "reclaimPolicy": {
+      "description": "Dynamically provisioned PersistentVolumes of this storage class are created with this reclaimPolicy. Defaults to Delete.",
+      "type": "string"
      }
     },
     "x-kubernetes-group-version-kind": [