github/kubernetes
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #47987 from wongma7/reclaimpolicy

Browse Source 
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49869, 47987, 50211, 50804, 50583)

Add ReclaimPolicy field to StorageClass

fix https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/38192, enough people want this imo so going ahead and adding it according to initial suggested design

some considerations:
* No Recycle allowed, Retain (& Delete) only.
* Do we need to gate the field.
* E2E test where a Retain PV is dynamically provisioned is TODO if we agree we want this & this is the way to do it.
* Need a feature repo issue to track docs and stuff for 1.8

**Release note**:

```release-note
StorageClass has a new field to configure reclaim policy of dynamically provisioned PVs.
```
This commit is contained in:
Kubernetes Submit Queue
2017-08-17 01:32:18 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent e5b68f0e69 396e6f6eb1
commit 9c8f74e45c
46 changed files with 757 additions and 232 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
pkg/api/defaulting_test.go
View File

@@ -129,6 +129,10 @@ func TestDefaulting(t *testing.T) {
{Group: "admissionregistration.k8s.io", Version: "v1alpha1", Kind: "ExternalAdmissionHookConfigurationList"}: {},
{Group: "networking.k8s.io", Version: "v1", Kind: "NetworkPolicy"}: {},
{Group: "networking.k8s.io", Version: "v1", Kind: "NetworkPolicyList"}: {},
{Group: "storage.k8s.io", Version: "v1beta1", Kind: "StorageClass"}: {},
{Group: "storage.k8s.io", Version: "v1beta1", Kind: "StorageClassList"}: {},
{Group: "storage.k8s.io", Version: "v1", Kind: "StorageClass"}: {},
{Group: "storage.k8s.io", Version: "v1", Kind: "StorageClassList"}: {},
}
f := fuzz.New().NilChance(.5).NumElements(1, 1).RandSource(rand.NewSource(1))