Fixed pod anti-affinity bugs.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2606,12 +2606,17 @@ func TestInterPodAffinityWithMultipleNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
labelRgIndia := map[string]string{
|
||||
"region": "India",
|
||||
}
|
||||
labelRgUS := map[string]string{
|
||||
"region": "US",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tests := []struct {
|
||||
pod *v1.Pod
|
||||
pods []*v1.Pod
|
||||
nodes []v1.Node
|
||||
fits map[string]bool
|
||||
test string
|
||||
pod *v1.Pod
|
||||
pods []*v1.Pod
|
||||
nodes []v1.Node
|
||||
fits map[string]bool
|
||||
test string
|
||||
nometa bool
|
||||
}{
|
||||
{
|
||||
pod: &v1.Pod{
|
||||
@@ -2817,6 +2822,71 @@ func TestInterPodAffinityWithMultipleNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
},
|
||||
test: "NodeA and nodeB have same topologyKey and label value. NodeA has an existing pod that match the inter pod affinity rule. The pod can not be scheduled onto nodeA and nodeB but can be schedulerd onto nodeC",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
pod: &v1.Pod{
|
||||
ObjectMeta: v1.ObjectMeta{Labels: map[string]string{"foo": "123"}},
|
||||
Spec: v1.PodSpec{
|
||||
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
||||
PodAntiAffinity: &v1.PodAntiAffinity{
|
||||
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
||||
{
|
||||
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
||||
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
||||
{
|
||||
Key: "foo",
|
||||
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
|
||||
Values: []string{"bar"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
TopologyKey: "region",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
pods: []*v1.Pod{
|
||||
{Spec: v1.PodSpec{NodeName: "nodeA"}, ObjectMeta: v1.ObjectMeta{Labels: map[string]string{"foo": "bar"}}},
|
||||
{
|
||||
Spec: v1.PodSpec{
|
||||
NodeName: "nodeC",
|
||||
Affinity: &v1.Affinity{
|
||||
PodAntiAffinity: &v1.PodAntiAffinity{
|
||||
RequiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: []v1.PodAffinityTerm{
|
||||
{
|
||||
LabelSelector: &metav1.LabelSelector{
|
||||
MatchExpressions: []metav1.LabelSelectorRequirement{
|
||||
{
|
||||
Key: "foo",
|
||||
Operator: metav1.LabelSelectorOpIn,
|
||||
Values: []string{"123"},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
TopologyKey: "region",
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
nodes: []v1.Node{
|
||||
{ObjectMeta: v1.ObjectMeta{Name: "nodeA", Labels: labelRgChina}},
|
||||
{ObjectMeta: v1.ObjectMeta{Name: "nodeB", Labels: labelRgChinaAzAz1}},
|
||||
{ObjectMeta: v1.ObjectMeta{Name: "nodeC", Labels: labelRgIndia}},
|
||||
{ObjectMeta: v1.ObjectMeta{Name: "nodeD", Labels: labelRgUS}},
|
||||
},
|
||||
fits: map[string]bool{
|
||||
"nodeA": false,
|
||||
"nodeB": false,
|
||||
"nodeC": false,
|
||||
"nodeD": true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
test: "NodeA and nodeB have same topologyKey and label value. NodeA has an existing pod that match the inter pod affinity rule. NodeC has an existing pod that match the inter pod affinity rule. The pod can not be scheduled onto nodeA, nodeB and nodeC but can be schedulerd onto nodeD",
|
||||
nometa: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
affinityExpectedFailureReasons := []algorithm.PredicateFailureReason{ErrPodAffinityNotMatch}
|
||||
selectorExpectedFailureReasons := []algorithm.PredicateFailureReason{ErrNodeSelectorNotMatch}
|
||||
@@ -2839,7 +2909,14 @@ func TestInterPodAffinityWithMultipleNodes(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
nodeInfo := schedulercache.NewNodeInfo(podsOnNode...)
|
||||
nodeInfo.SetNode(&node)
|
||||
nodeInfoMap := map[string]*schedulercache.NodeInfo{node.Name: nodeInfo}
|
||||
fits, reasons, err := testFit.InterPodAffinityMatches(test.pod, PredicateMetadata(test.pod, nodeInfoMap), nodeInfo)
|
||||
|
||||
var meta interface{} = nil
|
||||
|
||||
if !test.nometa {
|
||||
meta = PredicateMetadata(test.pod, nodeInfoMap)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fits, reasons, err := testFit.InterPodAffinityMatches(test.pod, meta, nodeInfo)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Errorf("%s: unexpected error %v", test.test, err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user