Take availability.md doc and

- extract the portion related to multi-cluster operation into a new multi-cluster.md doc
- merge the remainder (that was basically high-level troubleshooting advice) into cluster-troubleshooting.md
This commit is contained in:
David Oppenheimer
2015-07-16 02:20:30 -07:00
parent 596a8a40d1
commit c57c877670
5 changed files with 86 additions and 82 deletions

View File

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Before choosing a particular guide, here are some things to consider:
Kubernetes.
- If you are configuring kubernetes on-premises, you will need to consider what [networking
model](networking.md) fits best.
- If you are designing for very [high-availability](availability.md), you may want multiple clusters in multiple zones.
- If you are designing for very high-availability, you may want [clusters in multiple zones](multi-cluster.md).
## Setting up a cluster

View File

@@ -47,6 +47,80 @@ of the relevant log files. (note that on systemd based systems, you may need to
* /var/log/kubelet.log - Kubelet, responsible for running containers on the node
* /var/log/kube-proxy.log - Kube Proxy, responsible for service load balancing
## A general overview of cluster failure modes
This is an incomplete list of things that could go wrong, and how to deal with them.
Root causes:
- VM(s) shutdown
- Network partition within cluster, or between cluster and users
- Crashes in Kubernetes software
- Data loss or unavailability of persistent storage (e.g. GCE PD or AWS EBS volume)
- Operator error, e.g. misconfigured kubernetes software or application software
Specific scenarios:
- Apiserver VM shutdown or apiserver crashing
- Results
- unable to stop, update, or start new pods, services, replication controller
- existing pods and services should continue to work normally, unless they depend on the Kubernetes API
- Apiserver backing storage lost
- Results
- apiserver should fail to come up
- kubelets will not be able to reach it but will continue to run the same pods and provide the same service proxying
- manual recovery or recreation of apiserver state necessary before apiserver is restarted
- Supporting services (node controller, replication controller manager, scheduler, etc) VM shutdown or crashes
- currently those are colocated with the apiserver, and their unavailability has similar consequences as apiserver
- in future, these will be replicated as well and may not be co-located
- they do not have their own persistent state
- Individual node (VM or physical machine) shuts down
- Results
- pods on that Node stop running
- Network partition
- Results
- partition A thinks the nodes in partition B are down; partition B thinks the apiserver is down. (Assuming the master VM ends up in partition A.)
- Kubelet software fault
- Results
- crashing kubelet cannot start new pods on the node
- kubelet might delete the pods or not
- node marked unhealthy
- replication controllers start new pods elsewhere
- Cluster operator error
- Results
- loss of pods, services, etc
- lost of apiserver backing store
- users unable to read API
- etc.
Mitigations:
- Action: Use IaaS providers automatic VM restarting feature for IaaS VMs
- Mitigates: Apiserver VM shutdown or apiserver crashing
- Mitigates: Supporting services VM shutdown or crashes
- Action use IaaS providers reliable storage (e.g GCE PD or AWS EBS volume) for VMs with apiserver+etcd
- Mitigates: Apiserver backing storage lost
- Action: Use [replicated APIserver](high-availability.md) feature
- Mitigates: Apiserver VM shutdown or apiserver crashing
- Will tolerate one or more simultaneous apiserver failures
- Mitigates: Apiserver backing storage (i.e., etcd's data directory) lost
- Each apiserver has independent storage. Etcd will recover from loss of one member. Risk of total data loss greatly reduced.
- Action: Snapshot apiserver PDs/EBS-volumes periodically
- Mitigates: Apiserver backing storage lost
- Mitigates: Some cases of operator error
- Mitigates: Some cases of kubernetes software fault
- Action: use replication controller and services in front of pods
- Mitigates: Node shutdown
- Mitigates: Kubelet software fault
- Action: applications (containers) designed to tolerate unexpected restarts
- Mitigates: Node shutdown
- Mitigates: Kubelet software fault
- Action: Multiple independent clusters (and avoid making risky changes to all clusters at once)
- Mitigates: Everything listed above.
<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/docs/admin/cluster-troubleshooting.md?pixel)]()

View File

@@ -20,87 +20,17 @@ certainly want the docs that go with that version.</h1>
<!-- END STRIP_FOR_RELEASE -->
<!-- END MUNGE: UNVERSIONED_WARNING -->
# Availability
This document collects advice on reasoning about and provisioning for high-availability when using Kubernetes clusters.
## Failure modes
This is an incomplete list of things that could go wrong, and how to deal with them.
Root causes:
- VM(s) shutdown
- network partition within cluster, or between cluster and users.
- crashes in Kubernetes software
- data loss or unavailability of persistent storage (e.g. GCE PD or AWS EBS volume).
- operator error misconfigures kubernetes software or application software.
Specific scenarios:
- Apiserver VM shutdown or apiserver crashing
- Results
- unable to stop, update, or start new pods, services, replication controller
- existing pods and services should continue to work normally, unless they depend on the Kubernetes API
- Apiserver backing storage lost
- Results
- apiserver should fail to come up.
- kubelets will not be able to reach it but will continue to run the same pods and provide the same service proxying.
- manual recovery or recreation of apiserver state necessary before apiserver is restarted.
- Supporting services (node controller, replication controller manager, scheduler, etc) VM shutdown or crashes
- currently those are colocated with the apiserver, and their unavailability has similar consequences as apiserver
- in future, these will be replicated as well and may not be co-located
- they do not have own persistent state
- Node (thing that runs kubelet and kube-proxy and pods) shutdown
- Results
- pods on that Node stop running
- Kubelet software fault
- Results
- crashing kubelet cannot start new pods on the node
- kubelet might delete the pods or not
- node marked unhealthy
- replication controllers start new pods elsewhere
- Cluster operator error
- Results:
- loss of pods, services, etc
- lost of apiserver backing store
- users unable to read API
- etc
Mitigations:
- Action: Use IaaS providers automatic VM restarting feature for IaaS VMs.
- Mitigates: Apiserver VM shutdown or apiserver crashing
- Mitigates: Supporting services VM shutdown or crashes
- Action use IaaS providers reliable storage (e.g GCE PD or AWS EBS volume) for VMs with apiserver+etcd.
- Mitigates: Apiserver backing storage lost
- Action: Use Replicated APIserver feature (when complete: feature is planned but not implemented)
- Mitigates: Apiserver VM shutdown or apiserver crashing
- Will tolerate one or more simultaneous apiserver failures.
- Mitigates: Apiserver backing storage lost
- Each apiserver has independent storage. Etcd will recover from loss of one member. Risk of total data loss greatly reduced.
- Action: Snapshot apiserver PDs/EBS-volumes periodically
- Mitigates: Apiserver backing storage lost
- Mitigates: Some cases of operator error
- Mitigates: Some cases of kubernetes software fault
- Action: use replication controller and services in front of pods
- Mitigates: Node shutdown
- Mitigates: Kubelet software fault
- Action: applications (containers) designed to tolerate unexpected restarts
- Mitigates: Node shutdown
- Mitigates: Kubelet software fault
- Action: Multiple independent clusters (and avoid making risky changes to all clusters at once)
- Mitigates: Everything listed above.
## Choosing Multiple Kubernetes Clusters
# Considerations for running multiple Kubernetes clusters
You may want to set up multiple kubernetes clusters, both to
have clusters in different regions to be nearer to your users; and to tolerate failures and/or invasive maintenance.
This document describes some of the issues to consider when making a decision about doing so.
### Scope of a single cluster
Note that at present,
Kubernetes does not offer a mechanism to aggregate multiple clusters into a single virtual cluster. However,
we [plan to do this in the future](../proposals/federation.md).
## Scope of a single cluster
On IaaS providers such as Google Compute Engine or Amazon Web Services, a VM exists in a
[zone](https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/zones) or [availability
@@ -124,7 +54,7 @@ Reasons to have multiple clusters include:
below).
- test clusters to canary new Kubernetes releases or other cluster software.
### Selecting the right number of clusters
## Selecting the right number of clusters
The selection of the number of kubernetes clusters may be a relatively static choice, only revisited occasionally.
By contrast, the number of nodes in a cluster and the number of pods in a service may be change frequently according to
load and growth.
@@ -153,5 +83,5 @@ failures of a single cluster are not visible to end users.
<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->
[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/docs/admin/availability.md?pixel)]()
[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/docs/admin/multi-cluster.md?pixel)]()
<!-- END MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS -->