github/kubernetes
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Kube-proxy: REJECT LB IPs with no endpoints

Browse Source 
We REJECT every other case.  Close this FIXME.

To get this to work in all cases, we have to process service in
filter.INPUT, since LB IPS might be manged as local addresses.
This commit is contained in:
Tim Hockin
2019-02-18 23:52:24 -08:00
parent 382f5c83c0
commit de25d6cb95
3 changed files with 105 additions and 7 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
pkg/proxy/iptables/proxier.go
View File

@@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ var iptablesJumpChains = []iptablesJumpChain{
{utiliptables.TableFilter, kubeExternalServicesChain, utiliptables.ChainInput, "kubernetes externally-visible service portals", []string{"-m", "conntrack", "--ctstate", "NEW"}},
{utiliptables.TableFilter, kubeServicesChain, utiliptables.ChainForward, "kubernetes service portals", []string{"-m", "conntrack", "--ctstate", "NEW"}},
{utiliptables.TableFilter, kubeServicesChain, utiliptables.ChainOutput, "kubernetes service portals", []string{"-m", "conntrack", "--ctstate", "NEW"}},
{utiliptables.TableFilter, kubeServicesChain, utiliptables.ChainInput, "kubernetes service portals", []string{"-m", "conntrack", "--ctstate", "NEW"}},
{utiliptables.TableFilter, kubeForwardChain, utiliptables.ChainForward, "kubernetes forwarding rules", nil},
{utiliptables.TableNAT, kubeServicesChain, utiliptables.ChainOutput, "kubernetes service portals", nil},
{utiliptables.TableNAT, kubeServicesChain, utiliptables.ChainPrerouting, "kubernetes service portals", nil},
@@ -847,6 +848,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
}
writeLine(proxier.natRules, append(args, "-j", string(svcChain))...)
} else {
// No endpoints.
writeLine(proxier.filterRules,
"-A", string(kubeServicesChain),
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s has no endpoints"`, svcNameString),
@@ -917,6 +919,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
// This covers cases like GCE load-balancers which get added to the local routing table.
writeLine(proxier.natRules, append(dstLocalOnlyArgs, "-j", string(svcChain))...)
} else {
// No endpoints.
writeLine(proxier.filterRules,
"-A", string(kubeExternalServicesChain),
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s has no endpoints"`, svcNameString),
@@ -929,10 +932,10 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
}
// Capture load-balancer ingress.
if hasEndpoints {
fwChain := svcInfo.serviceFirewallChainName
for _, ingress := range svcInfo.LoadBalancerStatus.Ingress {
if ingress.IP != "" {
fwChain := svcInfo.serviceFirewallChainName
for _, ingress := range svcInfo.LoadBalancerStatus.Ingress {
if ingress.IP != "" {
if hasEndpoints {
// create service firewall chain
if chain, ok := existingNATChains[fwChain]; ok {
writeBytesLine(proxier.natChains, chain)
@@ -993,10 +996,19 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
// If the packet was able to reach the end of firewall chain, then it did not get DNATed.
// It means the packet cannot go thru the firewall, then mark it for DROP
writeLine(proxier.natRules, append(args, "-j", string(KubeMarkDropChain))...)
} else {
// No endpoints.
writeLine(proxier.filterRules,
"-A", string(kubeServicesChain),
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s has no endpoints"`, svcNameString),
"-m", protocol, "-p", protocol,
"-d", utilproxy.ToCIDR(net.ParseIP(ingress.IP)),
"--dport", strconv.Itoa(svcInfo.Port),
"-j", "REJECT",
)
}
}
}
// FIXME: do we need REJECT rules for load-balancer ingress if !hasEndpoints?
// Capture nodeports. If we had more than 2 rules it might be
// worthwhile to make a new per-service chain for nodeport rules, but
@@ -1078,6 +1090,7 @@ func (proxier *Proxier) syncProxyRules() {
writeLine(proxier.natRules, append(args, "-j", string(svcXlbChain))...)
}
} else {
// No endpoints.
writeLine(proxier.filterRules,
"-A", string(kubeExternalServicesChain),
"-m", "comment", "--comment", fmt.Sprintf(`"%s has no endpoints"`, svcNameString),