Fixes instances of #98213 (to ultimately complete #98213 linting is
required).
This commit fixes a few instances of a common mistake done when writing
parallel subtests or Ginkgo tests (basically any test in which the test
closure is dynamically created in a loop and the loop doesn't wait for
the test closure to complete).
I'm developing a very specific linter that detects this king of mistake
and these are the only violations of it it found in this repo (it's not
airtight so there may be more).
In the case of Ginkgo tests, without this fix, only the last entry in
the loop iteratee is actually tested. In the case of Parallel tests I
think it's the same problem but maybe a bit different, iiuc it depends
on the execution speed.
Waiting for the CI to confirm the tests are still passing, even after
this fix - since it's likely it's the first time those test cases are
executed - they may be buggy or testing code that is buggy.
Another instance of this is in `test/e2e/storage/csi_mock_volume.go` and
is still failing so it has been left out of this commit and will be
addressed in a separate one
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDR` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
It is used to request that a pod runs in a unique user namespace.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigoca@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigoca@microsoft.com>
* Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api, ClusterCIDRConfig type
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDRConfig` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
* Change ClusterCIDRConfig.NodeSelector type in api
* Fix review comments for API
* Update ClusterCIDRConfig API Spec
Introduce PerNodeHostBits field, remove PerNodeMaskSize
* Add FeatureGate PodHostIPs
* Add HostIPs field and update PodIPs field
* Types conversion
* Add dropDisabledStatusFields
* Add HostIPs for kubelet
* Add fuzzer for PodStatus
* Add status.hostIPs in ConvertDownwardAPIFieldLabel
* Add status.hostIPs in validEnvDownwardAPIFieldPathExpressions
* Downward API support for status.hostIPs
* Add DownwardAPI validation for status.hostIPs
* Add e2e to check that hostIPs works
* Add e2e to check that Downward API works
* Regenerate
* De-share the Handler struct in core API
An upcoming PR adds a handler that only applies on one of these paths.
Having fields that don't work seems bad.
This never should have been shared. Lifecycle hooks are like a "write"
while probes are more like a "read". HTTPGet and TCPSocket don't really
make sense as lifecycle hooks (but I can't take that back). When we add
gRPC, it is EXPLICITLY a health check (defined by gRPC) not an arbitrary
RPC - so a probe makes sense but a hook does not.
In the future I can also see adding lifecycle hooks that don't make
sense as probes. E.g. 'sleep' is a common lifecycle request. The only
option is `exec`, which requires having a sleep binary in your image.
* Run update scripts
