Fix some warnings from go-staticcheck.
"should use buffer.String() instead of string(buffer.Bytes()) (S1030)"
This warning is explained at this link.
https://staticcheck.io/docs/checks#S1030
the iptables restore function, if it considers that the --wait flag
is not supported, creates a lock file to mimic the iptables behaviour.
The test should take this into account and remove the file.
iptables has two options to modify the behaviour trying to
acquire the lock.
--wait -w [seconds] maximum wait to acquire xtables lock
before give up
--wait-interval -W [usecs] wait time to try to acquire xtables
lock
interval to wait for xtables lock
default is 1 second
Kubernetes uses -w 5 that means that wait 5 seconds to try to
acquire the lock. If we are not able to acquire it, kube-proxy
fails and retries in 30 seconds, that is an important penalty
on sensitive applications.
We can be a bit more aggresive and try to acquire the lock every
100 msec, that means that we have to fail 50 times to not being
able to succeed.
The firewalld monitoring code was not well tested (and not easily
testable), would never be triggered on most platforms, and was only
being taken advantage of from one place (kube-proxy), which didn't
need it anyway since it already has its own resync loop.
Since the firewalld monitoring was the only consumer of pkg/util/dbus,
we can also now delete that.
The iptables code was doing version detection on the iptables binary
but feature detection on the iptables-restore binary, to try to
support the version of iptables in RHEL 7, which claims to be 1.4.21
but has certain features from iptables 1.6.
The problem is that this particular set of versions and checks
resulted in the code passing "-w" ("wait forever for the lock") to
iptables, but "-w 5" ("wait at most 5 seconds for the lock") to
iptables-restore. On systems with very very many iptables rules, this
could result in the kubelet periodic resyncs (which use "iptables")
blocking kube-proxy (which uses "iptables-restore") and causing it to
time out.
We already have code to grab the lock file by hand when using a
version of iptables-restore that doesn't support "-w", and it works
fine. So just use that instead, and only pass "-w 5" to
iptables-restore when iptables reports a version that actually
supports it.
There were a few places that the last PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/54763 missed because the flags that PR covered were of the form -w2. Some of the code had --wait=2. This changes that code to use the same global variable for the wait setting so that everything is consistent.
For iptables save and restore operations, kube-proxy currently uses
the IPv4 versions of the iptables save and restore utilities
(iptables-save and iptables-restore, respectively). For IPv6 operation,
the IPv6 versions of these utilities needs to be used
(ip6tables-save and ip6tables-restore, respectively).
Both this change and PR #48551 are needed to get Kubernetes services
to work in an IPv6-only Kubernetes cluster (along with setting
'--bind-address ::0' on the kube-proxy command line. This change
was alluded to in a discussion on services for issue #1443.
fixes#50474
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 50029, 48517, 49739, 49866, 49782)
iptables_test should not run on OSX or Windows
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix for failing tests. Let's just skip these on darwin and windows
platforms as iptables is not available on these.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes#48509
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
When iptables-restore doesn't support --wait (which < 1.6.2 don't), it may
conflict with other iptables users on the system, like docker, because it
doesn't acquire the iptables lock before changing iptables rules. This causes
sporadic docker failures when starting containers.
To ensure those don't happen, essentially duplicate the iptables locking
logic inside util/iptables when we know iptables-restore doesn't support
the --wait option.
Unfortunately iptables uses two different locking mechanisms, one until
1.4.x (abstract socket based) and another from 1.6.x (/run/xtables.lock
flock() based). We have to grab both locks, because we don't know what
version of iptables-restore exists since iptables-restore doesn't have
a --version option before 1.6.2. Plus, distros (like RHEL) backport the
/run/xtables.lock patch to 1.4.x versions.
Related: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/43575
See also: https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/13845
Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417234
iptables-restore did not previously perform any locking, meaning that
when callers (like kube-proxy) asked iptables-restore to write large
numbers of rules, the iptables-restore process might run in parallel
with other 'iptables' invocations in kubelet (hostports), docker,
and other software. This causes errors like:
"CNI request failed with status 400: 'Failed to ensure that nat chain
POSTROUTING jumps to MASQUERADE: error checking rule: exit status 4:
iptables: Resource temporarily unavailable."
or from Docker
"Failed to allocate and map port 1095-1095: iptables failed:
iptables --wait -t nat -A DOCKER -p tcp -d 0/0 --dport 1095
-j DNAT --to-destination 10.1.0.2:1095 ! -i lbr0: iptables:
Resource temporarily unavailable.\n (exit status 4)"
iptables-restore "wait" functionality was added in iptables git
commit 999eaa241212d3952ddff39a99d0d55a74e3639e but is NOT YET
in a released version of iptables.
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417234
A lot of packages use StringSet, but they don't use anything else from
the util package. Moving StringSet into another package will shrink
their dependency trees significantly.
Use iptables --wait (if available) to avoid race conditions with
util.iptables failing if it tries to modify the tables at the same
time as another process.
Also, reorganize the code a bit in preparation for checking for
another flag as well. And, if semver.NewVersion() returns an error, it
means there's a bug in the code somewhere (we should only ever be
passing it valid version strings), so just log that error rather than
returning it to the caller.
A service with a NodePort set will listen on that port, on every node.
This is both handy for some load balancers (AWS ELB) and for people
that want to expose a service without using a load balancer.
After this DNS is resolvable from the host, if the DNS server is targetted
explicitly. This does NOT add the cluster DNS to the host's resolv.conf. That
is a larger problem, with distro-specific tie-ins and circular deps.
