Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Laszlo Janosi
c970a46bc1
Mixed protocol support for Services with type=LoadBalancer (#94028)
* Mixed protocol support for Services with type=LoadBalancer

KEP: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/blob/master/keps/sig-network/20200103-mixed-protocol-lb.md
Add new feature gate to control the support of mixed protocols in Services with type=LoadBalancer
Add new fields to the ServiceStatus
  Add Ports to the LoadBalancerIngress, so cloud provider implementations can report the status of the requested load balanc
er ports
  Add ServiceCondition to the ServiceStatus so Service controllers can indicate the conditions of the Service

* regenerate conflicting stuff
2020-11-13 13:21:04 -08:00
Khaled Henidak (Kal)
6675eba3ef
dual stack services (#91824)
* api: structure change

* api: defaulting, conversion, and validation

* [FIX] validation: auto remove second ip/family when service changes to SingleStack

* [FIX] api: defaulting, conversion, and validation

* api-server: clusterIPs alloc, printers, storage and strategy

* [FIX] clusterIPs default on read

* alloc: auto remove second ip/family when service changes to SingleStack

* api-server: repair loop handling for clusterIPs

* api-server: force kubernetes default service into single stack

* api-server: tie dualstack feature flag with endpoint feature flag

* controller-manager: feature flag, endpoint, and endpointSlice controllers handling multi family service

* [FIX] controller-manager: feature flag, endpoint, and endpointSlicecontrollers handling multi family service

* kube-proxy: feature-flag, utils, proxier, and meta proxier

* [FIX] kubeproxy: call both proxier at the same time

* kubenet: remove forced pod IP sorting

* kubectl: modify describe to include ClusterIPs, IPFamilies, and IPFamilyPolicy

* e2e: fix tests that depends on IPFamily field AND add dual stack tests

* e2e: fix expected error message for ClusterIP immutability

* add integration tests for dualstack

the third phase of dual stack is a very complex change in the API,
basically it introduces Dual Stack services. Main changes are:

- It pluralizes the Service IPFamily field to IPFamilies,
and removes the singular field.
- It introduces a new field IPFamilyPolicyType that can take
3 values to express the "dual-stack(mad)ness" of the cluster:
SingleStack, PreferDualStack and RequireDualStack
- It pluralizes ClusterIP to ClusterIPs.

The goal is to add coverage to the services API operations,
taking into account the 6 different modes a cluster can have:

- single stack: IP4 or IPv6 (as of today)
- dual stack: IPv4 only, IPv6 only, IPv4 - IPv6, IPv6 - IPv4

* [FIX] add integration tests for dualstack

* generated data

* generated files

Co-authored-by: Antonio Ojea <aojea@redhat.com>
2020-10-26 13:15:59 -07:00
Dan Winship
3a110546ed Move SCTP to GA 2020-10-15 08:56:33 -04:00
Clayton Coleman
c6b833ac3c service: fix IPFamily validation and defaulting problems
If the dual-stack flag is enabled and the cluster is single stack IPv6,
the allocator logic for service clusterIP does not properly handle rejecting
a request for an IPv4 family. Return a 422 Invalid on the ipFamily field
when the dual stack flag is on (as it would when it hits beta) and the
cluster is configured for single-stack IPv6.

The family is now defaulted or cleared in BeforeCreate/BeforeUpdate,
and is either inherited from the previous object (if nil or unchanged),
or set to the default strategy's family as necessary. The existing
family defaulting when cluster ip is provided remains in the api
section. We add additonal family defaulting at the time we allocate
the IP to ensure that IPFamily is a consequence of the ClusterIP
and prevent accidental reversion. This defaulting also ensures that
old clients that submit a nil IPFamily for non ClusterIP services
receive a default.

To properly handle validation, make the strategy and the validation code
path condition on which configuration options are passed to service
storage. Move validation and preparation logic inside the strategy where
it belongs. Service validation is now dependent on the configuration of
the server, and as such ValidateConditionService needs to know what the
allowed families are.
2020-05-23 11:08:19 -04:00
Jordan Liggitt
34ac165a44 Move conditional validation for SCTPSupport to validation functions with knowledge of old objects 2019-02-05 23:09:31 -05:00