Align the behavior of HTTP-based lifecycle handlers and HTTP-based
probers, converging on the probers implementation. This fixes multiple
deficiencies in the current implementation of lifecycle handlers
surrounding what functionality is available.
The functionality is gated by the features.ConsistentHTTPGetHandlers feature gate.
* De-share the Handler struct in core API
An upcoming PR adds a handler that only applies on one of these paths.
Having fields that don't work seems bad.
This never should have been shared. Lifecycle hooks are like a "write"
while probes are more like a "read". HTTPGet and TCPSocket don't really
make sense as lifecycle hooks (but I can't take that back). When we add
gRPC, it is EXPLICITLY a health check (defined by gRPC) not an arbitrary
RPC - so a probe makes sense but a hook does not.
In the future I can also see adding lifecycle hooks that don't make
sense as probes. E.g. 'sleep' is a common lifecycle request. The only
option is `exec`, which requires having a sleep binary in your image.
* Run update scripts
- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
This allows us to interrupt/kill the executed command if it exceeds the
timeout (not implemented by this commit).
Set timeout in Exec probes. HTTPGet and TCPSocket probes respect the
timeout, while Exec probes used to ignore it.
Add e2e test for exec probe with timeout. However, the test is skipped
while the default exec handler doesn't support timeouts.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[AppArmor] Hold bad AppArmor pods in pending rather than rejecting
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/32837
Overview of the fix:
If the Kubelet needs to reject a Pod for a reason that the control plane doesn't understand (e.g. which AppArmor profiles are installed on the node), then it might contiinuously try to run the pod on the same rejecting node. This change adds a concept of "soft rejection", in which the Pod is admitted, but not allowed to run (and therefore held in a pending state). This prevents the pod from being retried on other nodes, but also prevents the high churn. This is consistent with how other missing local resources (e.g. volumes) is handled.
A side effect of the change is that Pods which are not initially runnable will be retried. This is desired behavior since it avoids a race condition when a new node is brought up but the AppArmor profiles have not yet been loaded on it.
``` release-note
Pods with invalid AppArmor configurations will be held in a Pending state, rather than rejected (failed). Check the pod status message to find out why it is not running.
```
@kubernetes/sig-node @timothysc @rrati @davidopp
Add support for terminal resizing for exec, attach, and run. Note that for Docker, exec sessions
inherit the environment from the primary process, so if the container was created with tty=false,
that means the exec session's TERM variable will default to "dumb". Users can override this by
setting TERM=xterm (or whatever is appropriate) to get the correct "smart" terminal behavior.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove RunInContainer interface in Kubelet Runtime interface
According to #24689, we should merge RunInContainer and ExecInContainer in the container runtime interface.
@yujuhong @kubernetes/sig-node
All external types that are not int64 are now marked as int32,
including
IntOrString. Prober is now int32 (43 years should be enough of an initial
probe time for anyone).
Did not change the metadata fields for now.
