The test "validates that there is no conflict between pods with same
hostPort but different hostIP and protocol" was testing the scheduler
capability to schedule pods on the same node with hostPorts, however,
it wasn´t validating that the HostPorts was working, causing false
positives, because the pods were scheduled, but the HostPort exposed
wasn´t working.
In order to test the HostPort functionality, we have to use HostNetwork
pods, that are incompatible with Windows platforms. Also, since this
is touching both network and scheduling, there is no clear the ownership,
but sig-network is happy to adopt it.
We also add a new test for scheduling only under "scheduling", so Windows
folks can use it to test the scheduled in that platform.
e2e test validates the following 3 extra endpoints
- readApiregistrationV1APIServiceStatus
- patchApiregistrationV1APIService
- listApiregistrationV1APIService
And same for go_test_conditional_pure.
Instead of aliasing. Aliases are annoying in a number of ways. This is
specifically bugging me now because they make the action graph harder to
analyze programmatically. By using aliases here, we would need to handle
potentially aliased go_binary targets and dereference to the effective
target.
The comment references an issue with `pure = select(...)` which appears
to be resolved considering this now builds.
kubeconform was choking on a typo in the description field, so I fixed
the typo while adding friendlier logging to tell me which file was
invalid
I got curious why tests didn't catch this, and it turns out kubeconform
and the behavior tests use different codepaths to load and validate. So
I merged them together
In caf0d1d61874a2c8687b7deb773eca30ddaee5b6 we documented a policy to
ensure that conformance tests should not rely in existence or use of
kubelet apis directly. So based on that we should drop conformance for
the two tests here that use the "/logs" endpoint directly.
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
we print yaml, so you can use yaml tools like `yq`:
```
e2e.test --list-conformance-tests | yq r - --collect *.testname
```
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
1. move the integration test of TaintBasedEvictions to test/integration/node
2. move the e2e test of TaintBasedEvictions e2e test/e2e/node
3. modify the conformance file to adapt the TaintBasedEviction test
The existing walk.go and conformance.txt have a few shortcomings
which we'd like to resolve:
- difficult to get the full test name due to test context nesting
- complicated AST logic and understanding necessary due to the
different ways a test can be invoked and written
This changes the AST parsing logic to be much more simple and simply
looks for the comments at/around a specific line. This file/line
information (and the full test name) is gathered by a custom ginkgo
reporter which dumps the SpecSummary data to a file.
Also, the SpecSummary dump can, itself, be potentially useful for
other post-processing and debugging tasks.
Signed-off-by: John Schnake <jschnake@vmware.com>
Organizes the behaviors directory based on SIG, and provides a few
example behavior descriptions for Pods and Services to start. Note
that these are very incomplete lists of behaviors at this point.
This is currently the top flake against PRs, so I'm tagging it
as [Flaky]. Flaky tests can't be conformance tests, so I'm
removing it from [Conformance] as well until this is resolved.
This reverts commit 4d3d364d2b.
This commit promoted a test to conformance and also changed the test at
the same time. It should have been split up into two PRs to verify
whether the change had the intended effect. The test is now failing
consistently, so reverting.
This also revealed that the regex for Context was too generous and would
catch things like SecurityContext or ContextWithFoo(...) calls
This ensures that test suites with a ineligible tag in their top-level
Describe will be rejected from promotion to conformance
If there are tags in the test name that describe qualities of the
test that make it ineligible for conformance, raise an error. This
is basically the "skip list" that heptio's e2e image used to use.
Thankfully all of our existing Conformance tests lack these tags. I
considered added [Slow] to the list, but let's save that for another
day.
At the moment, Windows cannot mount individual files into Containers, which means
that the Kubelet-managed hosts file cannot be mounted into the Container, causing
the "should provide DNS for the cluster" test to fail.
This test separates the hosts entries checks from the mentioned test to a new test.
Put into OWNERS files what has effectively been happening
for the past few months, we review and shepherd PR's
through other SIG reviewers before bringing to sig-arch
for a final /approve.
The goal is to eventually grow approvers when it's been
demonstrated that we have sufficient context.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67100, 67426). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
porting e2e_node lifecycle testcases into e2e folder under common
a) Shifted (and renamed) file existing in e2e_node to e2e/common.
b) Added these tests to the conformance suite:
- "should execute poststart exec hook properly"
- "should execute prestop exec hook properly"
- "should execute poststart http hook properly"
- "should execute prestop http hook properly"
[reference issue](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/67086) explaining the effort.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67071, 66906, 66722, 67276, 67039). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Promoting "[sig-storage] Secrets should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace" to Conformance
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
An consolidated effort to resolve the issue https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/66875
> _[sig-storage] Secrets should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace_
Promoting mentioned e2e test for Conformance as it -
- Validates that secret with same name can be created in different namespaces but secrets which reside in same namespace as that of pod can be only be accessed from volume mounted in the container.
- Improves api coverage including prioritized Pod API lists. https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/issues/220#issuecomment-393344061
> GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/log
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
POST /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
PUT /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/status
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No Flakes Found.
```
• [SLOW TEST:16.326 seconds]
[sig-storage] Secrets
/home/vagrant/go-workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/secrets_volume.go:33
should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace [NodeConformance]
/home/vagrant/go-workspace/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/local/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/secrets_volume.go:86
------------------------------
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Aug 7 07:12:44.133: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all node
Aug 7 07:12:44.134: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1
Ran 1 of 1020 Specs in 16.441 seconds
SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 1019 Skipped PASS
All tests passed...
Will keep running them until they fail.
This was attempt #40
No, seriously... you can probably stop now.
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 61212, 66369, 66446, 66895, 66969). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Promoting configmap binarydata support [NodeConformance] test to conformance
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**e2e:** _[sig-storage] ConfigMap binary data should be reflected in volume [NodeConformance]_
Promotes mentioned e2e to conformance as it -
1. Validates ConfigMap's binarydata support effectively
2. Improves API Coverage for prioritized api lists. (https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/issues/220#issuecomment-393344061)
> GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
GET /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/log
POST /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
PUT /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}/status
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods
DELETE /api/v1/namespaces/{namespace}/pods/{name}
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
No Flakes found.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 63572, 67084). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Remove [Conformance] from tests in test/e2e_node
Conformance tests live inside of test/e2e, none of the tests currently
tagged as `[Conformance]` in test/e2e_node actually get run when you run
the conformance tests with e2e.test (either directly or indirectly with
sonobuoy)
If these tests make sense as both `[NodeConformance]` and `[Conformance]`
tests, they should be ported to test/e2e/common
/kind cleanup
/area conformance
/sig architecture
/cc @bgrant0607 @smarterclayton @timothysc
/sig node
/cc @yujuhong
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/66875
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add Deployment conformance tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**: @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-architecture-pr-reviews
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 58058, 67033, 66921, 66956). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Promoting InitContainer [NodeConformance] e2e tests for Conformance
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
1. Promotes mentioned 4 InitContainer [NodeConformance] tests for Conformance
2. Validates different PodPhases effectively
3. Improves API coverage mentioned in #66124 .
E2E tests -
1. InitContainer [NodeConformance] should invoke init containers on a RestartNever pod
2. InitContainer [NodeConformance] should invoke init containers on a RestartAlways pod
3. InitContainer [NodeConformance] should not start app containers if init containers fail on a RestartAlways pod
4. InitContainer [NodeConformance] should not start app containers and fail the pod if init containers fail on a RestartNever pod
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66124
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/area conformance
@kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews
To detect whether conformance tests have been changed, the test
argument with the `ConformanceIt` is recorded to conformance.txt.
This change remove additional tags (e.g., [Feature:]) and trim spaces,
so that the detection is less-prone to noise.
This change also updates conformance.txt with normalized names.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Update all script shebangs to use /usr/bin/env interpreter instead of /bin/interpreter
This is required to support systems where bash doesn't reside in /bin (such as NixOS, or the *BSD family) and allow users to specify a different interpreter version through $PATH manipulation.
https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/finding-bash-perl-python-portably-using-env.html
```release-note
Use /usr/bin/env in all script shebangs to increase portability.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 60430, 60115, 58052, 60355, 60116). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add Garbage Collector e2e conformance tests
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The garbage collector is a core component of kubernetes and needs to be tested by conformance, so its functionality can be relied on in any kubernetes environment.
As we can see in [testgrid](https://k8s-testgrid.appspot.com/sig-api-machinery#gce), the garbage collector tests being promoted by this PR are consistently passing. And the intention to promote them to conformance tests was laid out by [this document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h2S9ff9N-4MKqfayE3A8TqjD_qIwuND_dAhOAJFxYS0)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The last two tests in this file are not added as conformance tests because they involve beta features (custom resources and cronjobs), and conformance tests are only allowed for features in GA.
**Release note**:
```release-note
New conformance tests added for the Garbage Collector
```
