Each e2e test knows it wants to restart a running kubelet or a
non-running kubelet. The vast majority of times, we want to
restart a running kubelet (e.g. to change config or to check
some properties hold across kubelet crashes/restarts), but sometimes
we stop the kubelet, do some actions and only then restart.
To accomodate both use cases, we just expose the `running` boolean
flag to the e2e tests.
Having the `restartKubelet` explicitly restarting a running kubelet
helps us to trobuleshoot e2e failures on which the kubelet
was supposed to be running, while it was not; attempting a restart
in such cases only murkied the waters further, making the
troubleshooting and the eventual fix harder.
In the happy path, no expected change in behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <fromani@redhat.com>
This drops testfiles.ReadOrDie and updated testfiles.Exists to return an
error, forcing the caller to decide whether to call framework.Fail or do
something else.
It makes for a slightly less friendly API, but also means the package is
decoupled from framework again, as per the comments at the top of the
file
Most of these could have been refactored automatically but it wouldn't
have been uglier. The unsophisticated tooling left lots of unnecessary
struct -> pointer -> struct transitions.
