Fixes instances of #98213 (to ultimately complete #98213 linting is
required).
This commit fixes a few instances of a common mistake done when writing
parallel subtests or Ginkgo tests (basically any test in which the test
closure is dynamically created in a loop and the loop doesn't wait for
the test closure to complete).
I'm developing a very specific linter that detects this king of mistake
and these are the only violations of it it found in this repo (it's not
airtight so there may be more).
In the case of Ginkgo tests, without this fix, only the last entry in
the loop iteratee is actually tested. In the case of Parallel tests I
think it's the same problem but maybe a bit different, iiuc it depends
on the execution speed.
Waiting for the CI to confirm the tests are still passing, even after
this fix - since it's likely it's the first time those test cases are
executed - they may be buggy or testing code that is buggy.
Another instance of this is in `test/e2e/storage/csi_mock_volume.go` and
is still failing so it has been left out of this commit and will be
addressed in a separate one
The Priority is determined as follows:
P0: ClusterCIDR with higher number of matching labels has highest
priority.
P1: ClusterCIDR having cidrSet with fewer allocatable Pod CIDRs has
higher priority.
P2: ClusterCIDR with a PerNodeMaskSize having fewer IPs has higher
priority.
P3: ClusterCIDR having label with lower alphanumeric value has higher
priority.
P4: ClusterCIDR with a cidrSet having a smaller IP address value has
higher priority.
Add a new cidrset named `multicidrset` which extends the current
cidrset mechanism to track allocatable Pod and Service CIDRs.
multicidrset stores the info about allocated CIDRs in a Map as opposed
to the current cidrset implementation where it is stored in a bitmap.
Introduce networking/v1alpha1 api group.
Add `ClusterCIDR` type to networking/v1alpha1 api group, this type
will enable the NodeIPAM controller to support multiple ClusterCIDRs.
After the userns PR got merged:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/111090
gnufied decided it might be safer if we feature gate this part of the
code, due to the kubelet volume host type assertion.
That is a great catch and this patch just moves the code inside the
feature gate if.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Campos <rodrigoca@microsoft.com>
github.com/opencontainers/selinux/go-selinux needs OS that supports SELinux
and SELinux enabled in it to return useful data, therefore add an interface
in front of it, so we can mock its behavior in unit tests.
In theory the check is not necessary, but for sake of robustness and
completenes, let's check SELinuxMountReadWriteOncePod feature gate before
assuming anything about SELinux labels.
