Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41701, 41818, 41897, 41119, 41562)
Allow updates to pod tolerations.
Opening this PR to continue discussion for pod spec tolerations updates when a pod has been scheduled already. This PR is built on top of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38957.
@kubernetes/sig-scheduling-pr-reviews @liggitt @davidopp @derekwaynecarr @kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42106, 42094, 42069, 42098, 41852)
Fix availableReplicas validation
An available replica is a ready replica, not the other way around
@kubernetes/sig-apps-bugs caught while testing https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42097
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Don't blame DNS spec on Kubernetes requirement for lower-case DNS labels.
**What this PR does / why we need it**: #39635 was rejected because it wasn't clear to the author (me) that lower-case DNS labels are in fact a [Kubernetes requirement](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39635#issuecomment-271404975) rather than from the [DNS RFC 1035](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt) or/and [DNS RFC 1123](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1123.txt).
**Special notes for your reviewer**: @thockin this is a first pass to make the error messages clearer about the fact that DNS specs are not to _blame_.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
replace global registry in apimachinery with global registry in k8s.io/kubernetes
We'd like to remove all globals, but our immediate problem is that a shared registry between k8s.io/kubernetes and k8s.io/client-go doesn't work. Since client-go makes a copy, we can actually keep a global registry with other globals in pkg/api for now.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @sttts
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39394, 38270, 39473, 39516, 36243)
Improve an error message when privileged containers are disallowed on the cluster
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
At present when user creates privileged pod and creation of privileged containers disallowed globally by a system administrator (kubelet and api-server were running with `--allow-privileged=false`), user will get the following error message:
```console
$ kubectl create -f nginx.pod
The Pod "nginx" is invalid: spec.containers[0].securityContext.privileged: Forbidden: disallowed by policy
```
"Disallowed by policy" may give a wrong assumption to a user that creation of privileged containers disallowed by [`PodSecurityPolicy`](http://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/pod-security-policy/) while it's not.
This commit improves error message and tries to point user to the right direction:
```console
$ kubectl create -f nginx.pod
The Pod "nginx" is invalid: spec.containers[0].securityContext.privileged: Forbidden: privileged containers are disallowed on this cluster by a system administrator
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
PTAL @pweil-
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38433, 36245)
Allow pods to define multiple environment variables from a whole ConfigMap
Allow environment variables to be populated from ConfigMaps
- ConfigMaps represent an entire set of EnvVars
- EnvVars can override ConfigMaps
fixes#26299
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make pvc storage class annotation immutable after create
Fixes#34516
Added immutable check in validation.go
```
# Please edit the object below. Lines beginning with a '#' will be ignored,
# and an empty file will abort the edit. If an error occurs while saving this file will be
# reopened with the relevant failures.
#
# persistentvolumeclaims "gce-claim-storageclass" was not valid:
# * metadata.annotations.volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-class: Invalid value: "slow2": field is immutable
#
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Improved validation error message when env.valueFrom contains no (or …
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
A misleading error message is shown if the user mistypes (or forgets to specify) a field under env.valueFrom. This is the error message: "may not have more than one field specified at a time". But there is only one (misspelled) field specified.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```
Improved error message for missing/misspelled field under env.valueFrom
```
- Prevents kubelet from overwriting capacity during sync.
- Handles opaque integer resources in the scheduler.
- Adds scheduler predicate tests for opaque resources.
- Validates opaque int resources:
- Ensures supplied opaque int quantities in node capacity,
node allocatable, pod request and pod limit are integers.
- Adds tests for new validation logic (node update and pod spec).
- Added e2e tests for opaque integer resources.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Loadbalanced client src ip preservation enters beta
Sounds like we're going to try out the proposal (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/30819#issuecomment-249877334) for annotations -> fields on just one feature in 1.5 (scheduler). Or do we want to just convert to fields right now?
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add unit test for bad ReclaimPolicy and valid ReclaimPolicy in /pkg/api/validation
unit tests for validation.go regarding PersistentVolumeReclaimPolicy (bad value and good value)
see PR: #30304
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add PVC storage to LimitRange
This PR adds the ability to add a LimitRange to a namespace that enforces min/max on `pvc.Spec.Resources.Requests["storage"]`.
@derekwaynecarr @abhgupta @kubernetes/sig-storage
Examples forthcoming.
```release-note
pvc.Spec.Resources.Requests min and max can be enforced with a LimitRange of type "PersistentVolumeClaim" in the namespace
```
