Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add PodSecurityPolicy OWNERS
Make myself an approver of PodSecurityPolicy, and also add a couple reviewers.
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 56947, 56349, 57140, 53686, 57314). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
admission_test.go(TestAdmitPreferNonmutating): simplify test
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR simplifies `TestAdmitPreferNonmutating` test by inlining members that have a constant values.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
PTAL @liggitt @tallclair
CC @simo5
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55557, 55504, 56269, 55604, 56202). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Create{Container,Pod}SecurityContext: modify a pod and don't return the annotations
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Prior https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/52849 we couldn't modify a pod and had to return annotations from the methods. But now, as we always working with a copy of a pod, we can modify it directly and we don't need to copy&return annotations separately.
This PR simplifies the code by modifying a pod directly. Also it renames these methods and replaces returning of the `SecurityContext` by in-place modification.
In fact it reverts the changes from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/30257
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
PTAL @liggitt @timstclair
CC @simo5
This admission plugin puts finalizer to every created PVC. The finalizer is
removed by PVCProtectionController when the PVC is not referenced by any
pods and thus the PVC can be deleted.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52767, 55065, 55148, 56228, 56221). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add resize support for ceph RBD
Add resize support for ceph RBD
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: part of [#657](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/657)
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add resize support for ceph RBD
```
WIP, need to add fs resize,
assign to myself first
/assign @NickrenREN
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
[PodSecurityPolicy] Optimize authorization check
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Authorizing PodSecurityPolicy use may involve a remote call, and can be slow. Rather than authorizing the user / SA for every policy in the cluster, only test authz for the policies under which the pod is valid.
This is a big improvement in the case where there are a lot of policies for which the pod is not valid (benchmark below), but should also help when the pod is valid under other policies, as it allows the authorization to short-circuit on the first accepted policy.
**Benchmark:**
Highlight from scale testing (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IIcHHE_No1KMAybW5krIphdN325eGa2sxF2eqg2YAPI/edit for the full results). These were run with 1000 policies under which the pods were not valid, and had no role bindings.
| | method | resource | 50th percentile | 90th percentile | 99th percentile
| -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
| 1.8 HEAD | POST | pods | 8.696784s | 20.497659s | 22.472421s
| 1.8 With fix | POST | pods | 25.454ms | 29.068ms | 85.817ms
(I didn't benchmark master, but expect the difference to be more drastic, since the authorization is run twice - for both Admit and Validate)
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**:
Fixes#55521
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
The validation errors are no longer totally accurate, as they may include errors from PSPs that the user/pod isn't authorized to use. However, I think this is a worthwhile tradeoff. If this is a big concern, we could authorize all policies in the case where none admitted /validated the pod.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Improved PodSecurityPolicy admission latency, but validation errors are no longer limited to only errors from authorized policies.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Implement volume resize for cinder
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
resize for cinder
xref: [resize proposal](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/657)
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: xref https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/657
Follow up: #49727
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Implement volume resize for cinder
```
wip, assign to myself first
/assign @NickrenREN
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 55938, 56055, 53385, 55796, 55922). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
admission: make admission metrics compositional
Metrics emission of admission plugins and the admission chain can be implemented compositionally, i.e. completely independently from the chain logic. This PR does that, moves the whole metrics code into a sub-package to contain complexity. The plumbing logic for the emitted metrics finally is cleanly done in the apiserver bootstrapping code, instead of being totally interleaved with the core admission logic.
Ratio:
- considerably less complexity
- admission plugins are compositional, including the chain. We cannot assume that there is only one chain at the outside of the admission plugin structure. Downstream projects might have more complex admission chains, i.e. multiple chain object nested.
- addition of metrics is plumbing and should be in the apiserver plumbing code. This makes it much easier to reason about the security critical admission chain.
Follow-up of #55183 and based on #55919.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add ExtendedResourceToleration admission controller.
/kind feature
/sig scheduling
/area hw-accelerators
There's elaborate discussion on this in #55080. In short, we would like to enable cluster operators and/or cloud providers to create dedicated nodes with extended resources (like GPUs, FPGAs etc.) that are reserved for pods requesting such resources. [Taints is the kubernetes concept to create dedicated nodes.](https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/taint-and-toleration/#example-use-cases) If the cluster operator or cloud provider wants to create dedicated node pools, they are expected to taint the nodes containing extended resources with the key equal to the name of the resource and effect equal to NoSchedule. If they do that, only pods that have a toleration for such a taint can be scheduled there. To make it easy for the user, this admission controller when enabled, automatically adds a toleration with key `example.com/device`, operator `Exists` and effect `NoSchedule` if an extended resource of name `example.com/device` is requested.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Add ExtendedResourceToleration admission controller. This facilitates creation of dedicated nodes with extended resources. If operators want to create dedicated nodes with extended resources (like GPUs, FPGAs etc.), they are expected to taint the node with extended resource name as the key. This admission controller, if enabled, automatically adds tolerations for such taints to pods requesting extended resources, so users don't have to manually add these tolerations.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Move of unreachable taint key out of alpha
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Move of unreachable taint key out of alpha, which already happened in community doc.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#54198
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Please see #54198 for the context of this inconsistency.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Move unreachable taint key out of alpha.
Please note the existing pods with the alpha toleration should be updated by user himself to tolerate the GA taint.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54556, 55379, 55881, 55891, 55705). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Ensure config file exists before loading configuration in imagePolicyWebhook
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
ensure config file exists before loading configuration in imagePolicyWebhook
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes**
Fixes#55378
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
This test would never fail because Annotations were empty in all cases!
This was missed when Tolerations were moved from Annotations to be part of Pod.Spec in #38957.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 54987, 55221, 54099, 55144, 54215). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
not calculate new priority when user update other spec of a pod
motivation of this change:
If we update the priority, pod validation mechanism will prevent this update
request, this is not expected.
**Release note**:
```
Priority admission controller: not calculate new priority when user update a pod
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
remove redundant code in admission initializer
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
remove unused return error in `k8s.io\kubernetes\staging\src\k8s.io\apiserver\pkg\admission\initializer\initializer.go`
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 53651, 55252). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
split serviceaccount admission into mutation and validation
Splits the SA admission plugin into mutation and validation halves.
I had some trouble with e2e tests before, so this got split out of another pull.
