Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 36263, 36755, 37357, 37222, 37524)
Add flag to enable contention profiling in scheduler.
```release-note
Add flag to enable contention profiling in scheduler.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/apis
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix default Seccomp profile directory
Looks like some of the refactoring caused us to lose the default
directory. Setting that explicitly here.
Fixes#36350
Provides an opt-in flag, --experimental-fail-swap-on (and corresponding
KubeletConfiguration value, ExperimentalFailSwapOn), which is false by default.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Rename experimental-runtime-integration-type to experimental-cri
Also rename the field in the component config to `EnableCRI`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Initial work on running windows containers on Kubernetes
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
This is the first stab at getting the Kubelet running on Windows (fixes#30279), and getting it to deploy network-accessible pods that consist of Windows containers. Thanks @csrwng, @jbhurat for helping out.
The main challenge with Windows containers at this point is that container networking is not supported. In other words, each container in the pod will get it's own IP address. For this reason, we had to make a couple of changes to the kubelet when it comes to setting the pod's IP in the Pod Status. Instead of using the infra-container's IP, we use the IP address of the first container.
Other approaches we investigated involved "disabling" the infra container, either conditionally on `runtime.GOOS` or having a separate windows-docker container runtime that re-implemented some of the methods (would require some refactoring to avoid maintainability nightmare).
Other changes:
- The default docker endpoint was removed. This results in the docker client using the default for the specific underlying OS.
More detailed documentation on how to setup the Windows kubelet can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IjwqpwuRdwcuWXuPSxP-uIz0eoJNfAJ9MWwfY20uH3Q.
cc: @ikester @brendandburns @jstarks
Automatic merge from submit-queue
make using service account credentials from controllers optional
Adds a flag to make the "SA per controller" behavior optional.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Kubelet] Use the custom mounter script for Nfs and Glusterfs only
This patch reduces the scope for the containerized mounter to NFS and GlusterFS on GCE + GCI clusters
This patch also enabled the containerized mounter on GCI nodes
Shepherding multiple PRs through the submit queue is painful. Hence I combined them into this PR. Please review each commit individually.
cc @jingxu97 @saad-ali
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35652 has also been reverted as part of this PR
Automatic merge from submit-queue
rename kubelet flag mounter-path to experimental-mounter-path
```release-note
* Kubelet flag '--mounter-path' renamed to '--experimental-mounter-path'
```
The feature the flag controls is an experimental feature and this renaming ensures that users do not depend on this feature just yet.
In order to be able to use new mounter library, this PR adds the
mounterPath flag to kubelet which passes the flag to the mount
interface. If flag is empty, mount uses default mount path.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
WIP: Remove the legacy networking mode
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Removes the deprecated configure-cbr0 flag and networking mode to avoid having untested and maybe unstable code in kubelet, see: #33789
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
fixes#30589fixes#31937
**Special notes for your reviewer**: There are a lot of deployments who rely on this networking mode. Not sure how we deal with that: force switch to kubenet or just delete the old deployment?
But please review the code changes first (the first commit)
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
Removed the deprecated kubelet --configure-cbr0 flag, and with that the "classic" networking mode as well
```
PTAL @kubernetes/sig-network @kubernetes/sig-node @mikedanese
