Currently, if you have a PDB with 0 disruptions
available and you attempt to evict a non-healthy
pod, the eviction request will always fail. This
is because the eviction API does not currently
take in to account that the pod you are removing
is the unhealthy one.
This commit accounts for trying to evict an
unhealthy pod as long as there are enough healthy
pods to satisfy the PDB's requirements. To
protect against race conditions, a ResourceVersion
constraint is enforced. This will ensure that
the target pod does not go healthy and allow
any race condition to occur which might disrupt
too many pods at once.
This commit also eliminates superfluous class to
DeepCopy for the deleteOptions struct.
In #56164, we had split the reject rules for non-ep existing services
into KUBE-EXTERNAL-SERVICES chain in order to avoid calling KUBE-SERVICES
from INPUT. However in #74394 KUBE-SERVICES was re-added into INPUT.
As noted in #56164, kernel is sensitive to the size of INPUT chain. This
patch refrains from calling the KUBE-SERVICES chain from INPUT and FORWARD,
instead adds the lb reject rule to the KUBE-EXTERNAL-SERVICES chain which will be
called from INPUT and FORWARD.
when DefaultPodTopologySpread feature is enabled
If SelectorSpreadPriority is in use, PodTopologySpread gets inevitably enabled.
When only EvenPodsSpreadPriority is in use, PodTopologySpread is configured without system defaults.
Change-Id: I2389a585cd8ad0bd35b0d2acae1665cd46908b3e
When a pod is deleted, it is given a deletion timestamp. However the
pod might still run for some time during graceful shutdown. During
this time it might still produce CPU utilization metrics and be in a
Running phase.
Currently the HPA replica calculator attempts to ignore deleted pods
by skipping over them. However by not adding them to the ignoredPods
set, their metrics are not removed from the average utilization
calculation. This allows pods in the process of shutting down to drag
down the recommmended number of replicas by producing near 0%
utilization metrics.
In fact the ignoredPods set is misnomer. Those pods are not fully
ignored. When the replica calculator recommends to scale up, 0%
utilization metrics are filled in for those pods to limit the scale
up. This prevents overscaling when pods take some time to startup. In
fact, there should be 4 sets considered (readyPods, unreadyPods,
missingPods, ignoredPods) not just 3.
This change renames ignoredPods as unreadyPods and leaves the scaleup
limiting semantics. Another set (actually) ignoredPods is added to
which delete pods are added instead of being skipped during
grouping. Both ignoredPods and unreadyPods have their metrics removed
from consideration. But only unreadyPods have 0% utilization metrics
filled in upon scaleup.
