Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39150, 38615)
Add work queues to PV controller
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead, where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37959, 36221)
Recycle Pod Template Check
The kube-controller-manager has two command line arguments (--pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-hostpath and --pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-nfs) that specify a recycle pod template. The recycle pod template may not contain the volume that shall be recycled.
A check is added to make sure that the recycle pod template contains at least a volume.
cc: @jsafrane
The kube-controller-manager has two command line arguments (--pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-hostpath and --pv-recycler-pod-template-filepath-nfs) that specify a recycle pod template. The recycle pod template may not contain the volume that shall be recycled.
A check is added to make sure that the recycle pod template contains at least a volume.
Currently, the HPA considers unready pods the same as ready pods when
looking at their CPU and custom metric usage. However, pods frequently
use extra CPU during initialization, so we want to consider them
separately.
This commit causes the HPA to consider unready pods as having 0 CPU
usage when scaling up, and ignores them when scaling down. If, when
scaling up, factoring the unready pods as having 0 CPU would cause a
downscale instead, we simply choose not to scale. Otherwise, we simply
scale up at the reduced amount caculated by factoring the pods in at
zero CPU usage.
The effect is that unready pods cause the autoscaler to be a bit more
conservative -- large increases in CPU usage can still cause scales,
even with unready pods in the mix, but will not cause the scale factors
to be as large, in anticipation of the new pods later becoming ready and
handling load.
Similarly, if there are pods for which no metrics have been retrieved,
these pods are treated as having 100% of the requested metric when
scaling down, and 0% when scaling up. As above, this cannot change the
direction of the scale.
This commit also changes the HPA to ignore superfluous metrics -- as
long as metrics for all ready pods are present, the HPA we make scaling
decisions. Currently, this only works for CPU. For custom metrics, we
cannot identify which metrics go to which pods if we get superfluous
metrics, so we abort the scale.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enable HPA controller based on autoscaling/v1 api group
ref #29778
``` release-note
Enable HPA controller based on autoscaling/v1 api group.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
lister-gen updates
- Remove "zz_generated." prefix from generated lister file names
- Add support for expansion interfaces
- Switch to new generated JobLister
@deads2k @liggitt @sttts @mikedanese @caesarxuchao for the lister-gen changes
@soltysh @deads2k for the informer / job controller changes
Automatic merge from submit-queue
convert SA controller to shared informers
convert the SA controller to shared informer + workqueue.
I think one of @derekwaynecarr @ncdc or @liggitt
Alter how runtime.SerializeInfo is represented to simplify negotiation
and reduce the need to allocate during negotiation. Simplify the dynamic
client's logic around negotiating type. Add more tests for media type
handling where necessary.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
decouple workqueue metrics from prometheus
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We want to include the workqueue in client-go, but do not want to having to import Prometheus. This PR decouples the workqueue from prometheus.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Partially address https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/33497
User requested for `workqueue` in client-go: https://github.com/kubernetes/client-go/issues/4#issuecomment-249444848
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
The implicit registration of Prometheus metrics for workqueue has been removed, and a plug-able interface was added. If you were using workqueue in your own binaries and want these metrics, add the following to your imports in the main package: "k8s.io/pkg/util/workqueue/prometheus".
```
