Automatic merge from submit-queue
update port validation message
Related Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355703#c2
Port validation that results in a multi-line message:
```
* spec.template.spec.containers[0].livenessProbe.httpGet.port: Invalid value: "": must contain only alpha-numeric characters (a-z, 0-9), and hyphens (-)
* spec.template.spec.containers[0].livenessProbe.httpGet.port: Invalid value: "": must contain at least one letter (a-z)
```
suggests that ports can only be at minimum one letter.
Per [this bugzilla comment](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355703#c2), this patch updates the second bullet point on the error message to be clearer:
```
* spec.template.spec.containers[0].livenessProbe.httpGet.port: Invalid value: "": must contain only alpha-numeric characters (a-z, 0-9), and hyphens (-)
* spec.template.spec.containers[0].livenessProbe.httpGet.port: Invalid value: "": must contain at least one letter or number (a-z, 0-9)
```
**Release note**:
```release-note
release-note-none
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
have basic kubectl crud agnostic of registered types
Makes `kubectl get` agnostic to scheme (baked in API types). This means that it will now work against generic API servers that are "kube shaped".
This is similar to the work done for `kubectl create` last release. I'll split out the smaller command. `kubectl get` looks a lot different, but this eliminates all special casing for TPR in those cases.
@fabianofranz
Automatic merge from submit-queue
refactor DeviceOpened() so it won't return error if device doesn't exist
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
DeviceOpened() is called after device is unmounted but before detached. Some volumes such as rbd don't support 3rd party detach, they have to be detached during unmount. Once detached, the device path vanishes. This causes false alarm when DeviceOpened() is called.
The fix is to ignore error IsNotExist
**Which issue this PR fixes** _(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)_: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@kubernetes/sig-storage
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
``` release-note
```
Signed-off-by: Huamin Chen hchen@redhat.com
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make the fake command factory return the clientset with appropriate rest clients for all the API groups.
Please review only the last commit here. This is based on PR #35865 which will be reviewed independently.
Design Doc: PR #34484
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-federation @nikhiljindal
This commit adds support for failing deployments based on a timeout
parameter defined in the spec. If there is no progress for the amount
of time defined as progressDeadlineSeconds then the deployment will be
marked as failed by adding a condition with a ProgressDeadlineExceeded
reason in it. Progress in the context of a deployment means the creation
or adoption of a new replica set, scaling up new pods, and scaling down
old pods.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Federation][init-08] Refactor the tests by pulling the common utilities into a testing package.
Please review only the last commit here. This is based on PR #35864 which will be reviewed independently.
Design Doc: PR #34484
cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-federation @nikhiljindal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix how we iterate over active jobs when removing them for Replace policy
When fixing the Replace Active removal I used wrong for loop construct which panics :/ This PR fixes that by using for range.
@janetkuo ptal
@jessfraz this will also be a cherry-pick candidate for 1.4, I remember we've picked the aforementioned fix as well
Automatic merge from submit-queue
CRI: Add devices to ContainerConfig
This PR adds devices to ContainerConfig and adds experimental GPU support.
cc/ @yujuhong @Hui-Zhi @vishh @kubernetes/sig-node
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add script to check for updates to the files for generation
Adds a verify script to help people writing APIs remember to wire all the individual pieces up. Eventually it will be better to avoid this altogether, but this is a start.
@ncdc fyi
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove non-generic options from genericapiserver.Config
Remove non-generic options from genericapiserver.Config. Changes the discovery CIDR/IP information to an interface and then demotes several fields.
I haven't pulled from them genericapiserver.Options, but that's a future option we have. Segregation as as a followup at the very least.
Generating self links, especially for lists, is inefficient. Replace
use of net.URL.String() with direct encoding that reduces number of
allocations. Switch from calling meta.ExtractList|SetList to a function
that iterates over each object in the list.
In steady state for nodes performing frequently small get/list
operations, and for larger LISTs significantly reduces CPU and
allocations.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Set reason and message on Pod during nodecontroller eviction
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Pods which are evicted by the nodecontroller due to network partition, or unresponsive kubelet should be differentiated from termination initiated by other sources. The reason/message are consumed by kubectl to provide a better summary using get/describe.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#35725
**Release note**:
```release-note
Pods that are terminating due to eviction by the nodecontroller (typically due to unresponsive kubelet, or network partition) now surface in `kubectl get` output
as being in state "Unknown", along with a longer description in `kubectl describe` output.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
kubectl: make edit work with lists again
@kubernetes/kubectl this is fixing https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20519 and slightly changes the behavior of --recursive when the directory that is being edited has files with errors. Previously since `edit` was working on an object basis, bad objects would be skipped and the editor would load the next object. We want to load multiple objects in the same list and it's impossible to load invalid objects in a list so --recursive will not work if there is any error in the directory. I think this is an acceptable trade-off.
Review here: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36148/files?w=1
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/kubectl
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Comment on the pull-request explaining the changes you want. I'll
take care of doing them (unless you want to modify the pull-request
yourself).
2. OWNERS files in subdirectory can be removed if they are redundant with
top-directory files.
3. Please use the ALIAS feature if you want to re-use a list of persons
in different files.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Switch DisruptionBudget api from bool to int allowed disruptions [only v1beta1]
Continuation of #34546. Apparently it there is some bug that prevents us from having 2 different incompatibile version of API in integration tests. So in this PR v1alpha1 is removed until testing infrastructure is fixed.
Base PR comment:
Currently there is a single bool in disruption budget api that denotes whether 1 pod can be deleted or not. Every time a pod is deleted the apiserver filps the bool to false and the disruptionbudget controller sets it to true if more deletions are allowed. This works but it is far from optimal when the user wants to delete multiple pods (for example, by decreasing replicaset size from 10000 to 8000).
This PR adds a new api version v1beta1 and changes bool to int which contains a number of pods that can be deleted at once.
cc: @davidopp @mml @wojtek-t @fgrzadkowski @caesarxuchao
Stopping a sandbox includes reclaiming the network resources. By always
stopping the sandbox before removing it, we reduce the possibility of leaking
resources in some corner cases.
