Automatic merge from submit-queue
Controller changes for perma failed deployments
This PR adds support for reporting failed deployments based on a timeout
parameter defined in the spec. If there is no progress for the amount
of time defined as progressDeadlineSeconds then the deployment will be
marked as failed by a Progressing condition with a ProgressDeadlineExceeded
reason.
Follow-up to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/19343
Docs at kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io#1337
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/14519
@kubernetes/deployment @smarterclayton
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add secret type to RBD secrets in examples and e2e test
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is a followup to recent changes in secret type matching
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@kubernetes/sig-storage @liggitt
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove statefulset e2e test setup for alpha
Depends on #35731, once statefulset is beta, it doesn't need special treatment for alpha version in e2e test
cc @erictune @foxish @kubernetes/sig-apps
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fixed kibana test problem
After #36103 a problem was introduced. If you change basePath, dynamic bundle optimization is performed upon startup, which can take several minutes.
Following PR fixed this problem by waiting until optimization is completed.
@piosz
Edit: This problem has no known workarounds if basePath is dynamic (like in our case)
Reference: https://discuss.elastic.co/t/how-to-avoid-dynamic-bundle-optimization/37367
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Enable NFS volume test
This PR fixes the dockerfile for NFS server image and enable NFSv4.
After using containeried mounts approach on GCI, this test should pass.
The functionality used to exist entirely in the NC which would
previously clean up pods and nodes together. Now, we simply
wait for the PodGC to see that the node is now deleted and clean up the
pods. This may take a while and hence we set a 1 minute timeout.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Switch DisruptionBudget api from bool to int allowed disruptions [only v1beta1]
Continuation of #34546. Apparently it there is some bug that prevents us from having 2 different incompatibile version of API in integration tests. So in this PR v1alpha1 is removed until testing infrastructure is fixed.
Base PR comment:
Currently there is a single bool in disruption budget api that denotes whether 1 pod can be deleted or not. Every time a pod is deleted the apiserver filps the bool to false and the disruptionbudget controller sets it to true if more deletions are allowed. This works but it is far from optimal when the user wants to delete multiple pods (for example, by decreasing replicaset size from 10000 to 8000).
This PR adds a new api version v1beta1 and changes bool to int which contains a number of pods that can be deleted at once.
cc: @davidopp @mml @wojtek-t @fgrzadkowski @caesarxuchao
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Kubelet] Use the custom mounter script for Nfs and Glusterfs only
This patch reduces the scope for the containerized mounter to NFS and GlusterFS on GCE + GCI clusters
This patch also enabled the containerized mounter on GCI nodes
Shepherding multiple PRs through the submit queue is painful. Hence I combined them into this PR. Please review each commit individually.
cc @jingxu97 @saad-ali
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35652 has also been reverted as part of this PR
Automatic merge from submit-queue
pod and qos level cgroup support
```release-note
[Kubelet] Add alpha support for `--cgroups-per-qos` using the configured `--cgroup-driver`. Disabled by default.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move Statefulset (previously PetSet) to v1beta1
**What this PR does / why we need it**: #28718
**Which issue this PR fixes** _(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)_: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**: depends on #35663 (PetSet rename)
cc @erictune @foxish @kubernetes/sig-apps
**Release note**:
``` release-note
v1beta1/StatefulSet replaces v1alpha1/PetSet.
```
When looking for overlapping deployments, we should also find other deployments that select current deployment's pods,
not just the ones whose pods are selected by current deployment.
--force is required for --grace-period=0. --now is == --grace-period=1.
Improve command help to explain what graceful deletion is and warn about
force deletion.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Making the pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized annotation optional in PetSet pods
**What this PR does / why we need it**: As of now, the absence of the annotation `pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized` in PetSets causes the PetSet controller to effectively "pause". Being a debug hook, users expect that its absence has no effect on the working of a PetSet. This PR inverts the logic so that we let the PetSet controller operate as expected in the absence of the annotation.
Letting the annotation remain alpha seems ok. Renaming it to something more meaningful needs further discussion.
**Which issue this PR fixes** _(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)_: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/35498
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
``` release-note
The annotation "pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized" on StatefulSets (formerly PetSets) is now optional and only encouraged for debug use.
```
cc @erictune @smarterclayton @bprashanth @kubernetes/sig-apps
@kow3ns The examples will need to be cleaned up as well I think later on to remove them.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Node controller to not force delete pods
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/35145
- [x] e2e tests to test Petset, RC, Job.
- [x] Remove and cover other locations where we force-delete pods within the NodeController.
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
``` release-note
Node controller no longer force-deletes pods from the api-server.
* For StatefulSet (previously PetSet), this change means creation of replacement pods is blocked until old pods are definitely not running (indicated either by the kubelet returning from partitioned state, or deletion of the Node object, or deletion of the instance in the cloud provider, or force deletion of the pod from the api-server). This has the desirable outcome of "fencing" to prevent "split brain" scenarios.
* For all other existing controllers except StatefulSet , this has no effect on the ability of the controller to replace pods because the controllers do not reuse pod names (they use generate-name).
* User-written controllers that reuse names of pod objects should evaluate this change.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Disruption e2e: wait for running pods in the table test, too
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Makes the `DisruptionController` tests less flaky.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#34032
Automatic merge from submit-queue
e2e: Fix GetReadySchedulableNodesOrDie for taints
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This changes framework.GetReadySchedulableNodesOrDie and
framework.GetMasterAndWorkerNodesOrDie so that nodes that can't take a
generic fake pod due to a taint/toleration mismatch aren't returned.
This is a rehash of #35210, but pulls in the scheduler code.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: c.f. #35210
**Special notes for your reviewer**: I think it's gross that we keep having to manually compute this in e2es. Maybe we need a bug for that?
This changes framework.GetReadySchedulableNodesOrDie and
framework.GetMasterAndWorkerNodesOrDie so that nodes that can't take a
generic fake pod due to a taint/toleration mismatch aren't returned.
This is a rehash of #35210, but pulls in the scheduler code.
