Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
CSI Node info registration in kubelet
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67683
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Feature issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/557
Design doc: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2034
Missing pieces:
* CSI client retry and exponential backoff logic.
* CSINodeInfo object validation
* e2e test with all the CSI machinery.
An RBAC rule is also added to support external-provisioner topology updates.
**Release note**:
```release-note
Registers volume topology information reported by a node-level Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver. This enables Kubernetes support of CSI topology mechanisms.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Fix metricsStatFS volume path for local volume
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix metricsStatFS volume path for local volume
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/kind bug
/sig storage
/assign @msau42
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Resolves#59015, Scheduler: Add support for EBS types t3, r5, & z1d
Fixes#59015
The new t3, r5, r5d and z1 need matched as well according to this:
From current AWS documentation:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/volume_limits.html
T3, C5, C5d, M5, M5d, R5, R5d, and z1d instances support a maximum of
28 attachments, and every instance has at least one network interface
attachment. If you have no additional network interface attachments on
these instances, you could attach 27 EBS volumes.
**Release note**:
```NONE
```
From current AWS documentation:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/volume_limits.html
T3, C5, C5d, M5, M5d, R5, R5d, and z1d instances support a maximum of
28 attachments, and every instance has at least one network interface
attachment. If you have no additional network interface attachments on
these instances, you could attach 27 EBS volumes.
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
as hostpathtype owner, adds myself to OWNERS file
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
As the owner of HostPathType, I would like to add myself to OWNERS file.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/cc thockin saad-ali
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 64283, 67910, 67803, 68100). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
CSI Cluster Registry and Node Info CRDs
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Introduces the new `CSIDriver` and `CSINodeInfo` API Object as proposed in https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2514 and https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2034
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/594
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Per the discussion in https://groups.google.com/d/msg/kubernetes-sig-storage-wg-csi/x5CchIP9qiI/D_TyOrn2CwAJ the API is being added to the staging directory of the `kubernetes/kubernetes` repo because the consumers will be attach/detach controller and possibly kubelet, but it will be installed as a CRD (because we want to move in the direction where the API server is Kubernetes agnostic, and all Kubernetes specific types are installed).
**Release note**:
```release-note
Introduce CSI Cluster Registration mechanism to ease CSI plugin discovery and allow CSI drivers to customize Kubernetes' interaction with them.
```
CC @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 68051, 68130, 67211, 68065, 68117). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
support cross resource group for azure file
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
support cross resource group for azure file: by `resourceGroup` field, azure cloud provider will create azure file on user specified resource group
```
---
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: azurefile-rg
provisioner: kubernetes.io/azure-file
parameters:
resourceGroup: RESOURCE_GROUP_NAME
storageAccount: EXISTING_STORAGE_ACCOUNT
```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#64428
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```
resourcegroup parameter is added to AzureFile storage class to support azure file dyanmic provision in cross resource group.
```
/kind bug
/sig azure
/assign @feiskyer
cd @khenidak
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67745, 67432, 67569, 67825, 67943). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Move volume dynamic provisioning scheduling to beta
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
* Combine feature gate VolumeScheduling and DynamicProvisioningScheduling into one
* Add allowedTopologies description in kubectl
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Wait until related e2e and downside plugins are ready.
/hold
**Release note**:
```release-note
Move volume dynamic provisioning scheduling to beta (ACTION REQUIRED: The DynamicProvisioningScheduling alpha feature gate has been removed. The VolumeScheduling beta feature gate is still required for this feature)
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67745, 67432, 67569, 67825, 67943). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Fix panic when choosing zone or zones for volume
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Fix panic when choosing zone or zones for volume, so that zoneSlice won't divide by zero now.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
cc @ddebroy @andyzhangx
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67766, 67642, 67772). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits,
This is an azure cloud provider implementation related to feature: [Dynamic Maximum volume count](https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/554)
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66269
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
This PR use `az.VirtualMachineSizesClient.List` to list all vm sizes under region, match vm size with current node size, and then got `MaxDataDiskCount`, the `GetVolumeLimits` happens in kubelet and will return `attachable-volumes-azure-disk` in node status as following example:
```
agentpool-22082114-0
...
allocatable:
attachable-volumes-azure-disk: "8"
cpu: "2"
ephemeral-storage: "28043041951"
hugepages-1Gi: "0"
hugepages-2Mi: "0"
memory: 7034772Ki
pods: "30"
```
**Release note**:
```
Enable dynamic azure disk volume limits
```
/sig azure
/kind feature
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add DynamicProvisioningScheduling support for GCE PD and RePD
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds support for the DynamicProvisioningScheduling feature for GCE PD and RePD. With this in place, if VolumeBindingMode: WaitForFirstConsumer is specified in a GCE storageclass and DynamicProvisioningScheduling is enabled, GCE PD provisioner will use the selected node's LabelZoneFailureDomain as (1) the zone to provision a GCE PD volume in (2) one of the zones to provision GCE RePD volume in.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
E2E tests for DynamicProvisioningScheduling scenarios for GCE PD to follow
**Release note**:
```release-note
none
```
/sig storage
/assign @msau42
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66916, 67252, 67794, 67619, 67328). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Using a fixed set of locks, then we don't need to free unused locks anymore.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Using a fixed set of locks, then we don't need to free unused locks anymore.
See kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/66442 for discussions.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65113
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/assign @msau42
/assign @thockin
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66980, 67604, 67741, 67715). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add support of Azure cross resource group nodes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Part of feature [Cross resource group nodes](https://github.com/kubernetes/features/issues/604).
This PR adds support of Azure cross resource group nodes that are labeled with `kubernetes.azure.com/resource-group=<rg-name>` and `alpha.service-controller.kubernetes.io/exclude-balancer=true`
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
See designs [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/2479).
**Release note**:
```release-note
Azure cloud provider now supports cross resource group nodes that are labeled with `kubernetes.azure.com/resource-group=<rg-name>` and `alpha.service-controller.kubernetes.io/exclude-balancer=true`
```
/sig azure
/kind feature
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 59230, 66233, 67483, 67713). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
change default value of kind for azure disk
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
change default value of kind for azure disk, as we are suggesting users to use managed disk, default value should be managed disk.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#67480
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
assign @feiskyer
FYI @khenidak @brendandburns
**Release note**:
```
change default value of kind for azure disk
```
/kind feature
/sig azure
