As per discussion with @snmarterclayton. I implemented this for most
types in the "obvious" way. I am not sure how to implement
this for a couple types, though.
This commit adds support to core resources to enable deferred deletion
of resources. Clients may optionally specify a time period after which
resources must be deleted via an object sent with their DELETE. That
object may define an optional grace period in seconds, or allow the
default "preferred" value for a resource to be used. Once the object
is marked as pending deletion, the deletionTimestamp field will be set
and an etcd TTL will be in place.
Clients should assume resources that have deletionTimestamp set will
be deleted at some point in the future. Other changes will come later
to enable graceful deletion on a per resource basis.
PUT /api/v1beta3/namespaces/default/pods/foo/status
{
"metadata": {...}, // allowed for valid values
"spec": {}, // ignored
"status": {...}, // allowed, except for Host
}
Exposes the simplest possibly change. Needs a slight refactoring
to RESTUpdateStrategy to split merging which can be done in a
follow up.
Also make sure all POST operations return 201 by default.
Removes the remainder of the asych logic in RESTStorage and
leaves it up to the API server to expose that behavior.
If a client says they want the name to be generated, a 409 is
not appropriate (since they didn't specify a name). Instead, we
should return the next most appropriate error, which is a 5xx
error indicating the request failed but the client *should* try
again. Since there is no 5xx error that exactly fits this purpose,
use 500 with StatusReasonTryAgainLater set.
This commit does not implement client retry on TryAgainLater, but
clients should retry up to a certain number of times.
Replaces the client public interface but leaves old references to "minions"
for a later refactor. Selects the path "nodes" for v1beta3 and "minions"
for older versions.
PUT allows an object to be created (http 201). This allows REST code to
indicate an object has been created and clients to react to it.
APIServer now deals with <-chan RESTResult instead of <-chan runtime.Object,
allowing more data to be passed through.
