The word 'manifest' technically refers to a container-group specification
that predated the Pod abstraction. We should avoid using this legacy
terminology where possible. Fortunately, the Kubelet's config API will
be beta in 1.10 for the first time, so we still had the chance to make
this change.
I left the flags alone, since they're deprecated anyway.
I changed a few var names in files I touched too, but this PR is the
just the first shot, not the whole campaign
(`git grep -i manifest | wc -l -> 1248`).
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Secure Kubelet's componentconfig defaults while maintaining CLI compatibility
This updates the Kubelet's componentconfig defaults, while applying the legacy defaults to values from options.NewKubeletConfiguration(). This keeps defaults the same for the command line and improves the security of defaults when you load config from a file.
See: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/53618
See: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/53833#discussion_r166669931
Also moves EnableServer to KubeletFlags, per @tallclair's comments on #53833.
We should find way of generating documentation for config file defaults, so that people can easily look up what's different from flags.
```release-note
Action required: Default values differ between the Kubelet's componentconfig (config file) API and the Kubelet's command line. Be sure to review the default values when migrating to using a config file.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix all the typos across the project
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
There are lots of typos across the project. We should avoid small PRs on fixing those annoying typos, which is time-consuming and low efficient.
This PR does fix all the typos across the project currently. And with #59463, typos could be avoided when a new PR gets merged.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
/sig testing
/area test-infra
/sig release
/cc @ixdy
/assign @fejta
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 57973, 57990). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Set pids limit at pod level
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add a new Alpha Feature to set a maximum number of pids per Pod.
This is to allow the use case where cluster administrators wish
to limit the pids consumed per pod (example when running a CI system).
By default, we do not set any maximum limit, If an administrator wants
to enable this, they should enable `SupportPodPidsLimit=true` in the
`--feature-gates=` parameter to kubelet and specify the limit using the
`--pod-max-pids` parameter.
The limit set is the total count of all processes running in all
containers in the pod.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#43783
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
New alpha feature to limit the number of processes running in a pod. Cluster administrators will be able to place limits by using the new kubelet command line parameter --pod-max-pids. Note that since this is a alpha feature they will need to enable the "SupportPodPidsLimit" feature.
```
Add a new Alpha Feature to set a maximum number of pids per Pod.
This is to allow the use case where cluster administrators wish
to limit the pids consumed per pod (example when running a CI system).
By default, we do not set any maximum limit, If an administrator wants
to enable this, they should enable `SupportPodPidsLimit=true` in the
`--feature-gates=` parameter to kubelet and specify the limit using the
`--pod-max-pids` parameter.
The limit set is the total count of all processes running in all
containers in the pod.
- Changes the following KubeletConfiguration fields from `string` to
`map[string]string`:
- `EvictionHard`
- `EvictionSoft`
- `EvictionSoftGracePeriod`
- `EvictionMinimumReclaim`
- Adds flag parsing shims to maintain Kubelet's public flags API, while
enabling structured input in the file API.
- Also removes `kubeletconfig.ConfigurationMap`, which was an ad-hoc flag
parsing shim living in the kubeletconfig API group, and replaces it
with the `MapStringString` shim introduced in this PR. Flag parsing
shims belong in a common place, not in the kubeletconfig API.
I manually audited these to ensure that this wouldn't cause errors
parsing the command line for syntax that would have previously been
error free (`kubeletconfig.ConfigurationMap` was unique in that it
allowed keys to be provided on the CLI without values. I believe this was
done in `flags.ConfigurationMap` to facilitate the `--node-labels` flag,
which rightfully accepts value-free keys, and that this shim was then
just copied to `kubeletconfig`). Fortunately, the affected fields
(`ExperimentalQOSReserved`, `SystemReserved`, and `KubeReserved`) expect
non-empty strings in the values of the map, and as a result passing the
empty string is already an error. Thus requiring keys shouldn't break
anyone's scripts.
- Updates code and tests accordingly.
Regarding eviction operators, directionality is already implicit in the
signal type (for a given signal, the decision to evict will be made when
crossing the threshold from either above or below, never both). There is
no need to expose an operator, such as `<`, in the API. By changing
`EvictionHard` and `EvictionSoft` to `map[string]string`, this PR
simplifies the experience of working with these fields via the
`KubeletConfiguration` type. Again, flags stay the same.
Other things:
- There is another flag parsing shim, `flags.ConfigurationMap`, from the
shared flag utility. The `NodeLabels` field still uses
`flags.ConfigurationMap`. This PR moves the allocation of the
`map[string]string` for the `NodeLabels` field from
`AddKubeletConfigFlags` to the defaulter for the external
`KubeletConfiguration` type. Flags are layered on top of an internal
object that has undergone conversion from a defaulted external object,
which means that previously the mere registration of flags would have
overwritten any previously-defined defaults for `NodeLabels` (fortunately
there were none).
