Automatic merge from submit-queue
Move HighWaterMark to the top of the struct in order to fix arm, second time
ref: #33117
Sorry for not fixing everyone at once, but I seriously wasn't prepared for that quick LGTM 😄, so here's the other half.
@lavalamp
> lgtm, but seriously, this is terrible, we probably have this bug all over. And what if someone embeds the etcdWatcher struct in something else not at the top? We need the compiler to enforce things like this, it just can't be done manually. Can you file or link a golang issue for this?
I totally agree! There isn't currently a way of programmatically detecting this unfortunately.
I guess @davecheney or @minux can explain better to you why it's so hard.
This is noted in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/proposals/multi-platform.md as a corner case indeed.
@pwittrock This should be cherrypicked toghether with #33117
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix race condition in setting node statusUpdateNeeded flag
This PR fixes the race condition in setting node statusUpdateNeeded flag
in master's attachdetach controller. This flag is used to indicate
whether a node status has been updated by the node_status_updater or
not. When updater finishes update a node status, it is set to false.
When the node status is changed such as volume is detached or new volume
is attached to the node, the flag is set to true so that updater can
update the status again. The previous workflow has a race condition as
follows
1. updater gets the currently attached volume list from the node which needs to be
updated.
2. A new volume A is attached to the same node right after 1 and set the
flag to TRUE
3. updater updates the node attached volume list (which does not include volume A) and then set the flag to FALSE.
The result is that volume A will be never added to the attached volume
list so at node side, this volume is never attached.
So in this PR, the flag is set to FALSE when updater tries to get the
attached volume list (as in an atomic operation). So in the above
example, after step 2, the flag will be TRUE again, in step 3, updater
does not set the flag if updates is sucessful. So after that, flag is
still TRUE and in next round of update, the node status will be updated.
This PR fixes the race condition in setting node statusUpdateNeeded flag
in master's attachdetach controller. This flag is used to indicate
whether a node status has been updated by the node_status_updater or
not. When updater finishes update a node status, it is set to false.
When the node status is changed such as volume is detached or new volume
is attached to the node, the flag is set to true so that updater can
update the status again. The previous workflow has a race condition as
follows
1. updater gets the currently attached volume list from the node which needs to be
updated.
2. A new volume A is attached to the same node right after 1 and set the
flag to TRUE
3. updater updates the node attached volume list (which does not include volume A) and then set the flag to FALSE.
The result is that volume A will be never added to the attached volume
list so at node side, this volume is never attached.
So in this PR, the flag is set to FALSE when updater tries to get the
attached volume list (as in an atomic operation). So in the above
example, after step 2, the flag will be TRUE again, in step 3, updater
does not set the flag if updates is sucessful. So after that, flag is
still TRUE and in next round of update, the node status will be updated.
This PR also changes a unit test due to the workflow changes
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Send recycle events from pod to pv.
This allows users to diagnose what's wrong with recycler. Recycler pods are started automatically with a cryptic name and they are deleted immediately when they finish.
e.g, `kubectl describe pv` could show that NFS cannot be mounted (and how many pods have tried it):
```
FirstSeen LastSeen Count From SubobjectPath Type Reason Message
--------- -------- ----- ---- ------------- -------- ------ -------
59m 59m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(5421800e-347b-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
53m 53m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(3c9809e5-347c-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
46m 46m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(250dd2a2-347d-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
40m 40m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(0d84ea33-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
33m 33m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(f5fb63bf-347e-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
27m 27m 1 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Unable to mount volumes for pod "recycler-for-nfs_default(de7128fd-347f-11e6-a79b-3c970e965218)": timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
1h 3m 75 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Successfully assigned recycler-for-nfs to 127.0.0.1
1h 3m 76 {persistentvolume-controller } Normal RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Pod was active on the node longer than specified deadline
1h 1m 12 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod Recycler pod: Error syncing pod, skipping: timeout expired waiting for volumes to attach/mount for pod "recycler-for-nfs"/"default". list of unattached/unmounted volumes=[vol]
20m 1m 4 {persistentvolume-controller } Warning RecyclerPod (events with common reason combined)
```
These steps were necessary:
- added event watcher to volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion
- pass all these events through volume plugins to volume controller
- rework volume.RecycleVolumeByWatchingPodUntilCompletion unit tests to a table (too much copy-paste)
- fix all unit tests along the way
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix FakeNodeHandler Update behaviour
Two problems:
1. Get is always using Existing nodes slice, and you will for sure miss any updated data
2. Each Update adds a duplicate node entry to UpdatedNodes slice
For the 1st, we will try to find a node in UpdatedNodes slice (same as for the List).
2nd - append only if there is no node with same name as updated, if there is we will replace object in UpdatedNodes slice.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Refactor cert utils into one pkg, add funcs from bootkube for kubeadm to use
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
We have ended-up with rather incomplete and fragmented collection of utils for handling certificates. It may be worse to consider using `cfssl` for doing all of these things, but for now there is some functionality that we need in `kubeadm` that we can borrow from bootkube. It makes sense to move the utils from bookube into core, as discussed in #31221.
**Special notes for your reviewer**: I've taken the opportunity to review names of existing funcs and tried to make some improvements in that area (with help from @peterbourgon).
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
move registry packages for all API groups
This continues the pattern of `registry/<group>/resource` for our backing storage. This entire pull is nothing but moves. I'll reswizzle the actual storage next, but these are cargo-culted everywhere, so I want to lay this down early.
@sttts @ncdc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
simplify RC and SVC listers
Make the RC and SVC listers use the common list functions that more closely match client APIs, are consistent with other listers, and avoid unnecessary copies.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
controller: enhance timeout error message for Recreate deployments
Makes the error message from https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/29197 more obvious
@kubernetes/deployment
Prior to this, we would approve eviction as long as the current state of
the pods matched the budget. The new version requires that after the
eviction, the pods would still match the budget.
Also update tests to match.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
[Controller Manager] Fix endpoint controller hot loop and use utilruntime.HandleError to replace glog.Errorf
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**Why**:
Fix endpoint controller hot loop and use `utilruntime.HandleError` to replace `glog.Errorf`
**What**
1. Fix endpoint controller hot loop in `pkg/controller/endpoint`
2. Fix endpoint controller hot loop in `contrib/mesos/pkg/service`
3. Sweep cases of `glog.Errorf` and use `utilruntime.HandleError` instead.
**Which issue this PR fixes**
Fixes#32843
Related issue is #30629
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
@deads2k @derekwaynecarr
The changes on `pkg/controller/endpoints_controller.go` and `contrib/mesos/pkg/service/endpoints_controller.go` are almost the same except `contrib/mesos/pkg/service/endpoints_controller.go` does not pass `podInformer` as the parameter of `NewEndpointController()`.
So, I didn't wait `podStoreSynced` before `syncService()`(Just leave it as it was). Will it lead to a problem?
Automatic merge from submit-queue
change factorization of listers to make them easier to add
`Listers` have a tremendous amount of duplicate code. This factors that out.
@smarterclayton ptal.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
convert daemonset controller to shared informers
Convert the daemonset controller completely to `SharedInformers` for its list/watch resources.
@kubernetes/rh-cluster-infra @ncdc
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Switch ScheduledJob controller to use clientset
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of #25442. I've applied here the same fix I've applied in the manual client in #29187, see the 1st commit for that (@caesarxuchao we've talked about it in #29856).
@deads2k as promised
@janetkuo ptal
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add the uid in a delete event to the absentOwnerCache
This is a small optimization to further reduce the traffic sent by the GC.
In #31167, GC caches the non-existent owners when it processes the dirtyQueue. As discovered in #32571, there is still small inefficiency, because there are multiple goroutines processing the dirtyQueue, many of them might send a GET to the apiserver before the cache gets populated.
This PR populates the cache when GC observes an object gets deleted, which happens before the processing of the dirtyQueue, so it avoids the simultaneous GET sent by the GC workers.
cc @lavalamp
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Do not report warning event when an unknown deleter is requested
When Kubernetes does not have a plugin to delete a PV it should wait for
either external deleter or storage admin to delete the volume instead of
throwing an error.
This is the same approach as in #32077
@kubernetes/sig-storage
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Recombine the condition for the "shouldScale" function
The PR recombine the condition for the "shouldScale" function, abstract the common condition(hpa.Status.LastScaleTime == nil).
Two problems:
1. Get is always using Existing nodes slice, and you will for sure miss any
updated data
2. Each Update duplicates node entry in UpdatedNodes slice
For the 1st, try to find a node in UpdatedNodes slice (same as for the List).
2nd - append only if there is no node with same name as updated, if there is
just replace object.
Change-Id: I9ef1cca2788ba946eee37fa1b037c124ad76074c
