- Run hack/update-codegen.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-device-plugin.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-protobuf.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-runtime.sh
- Run hack/update-generated-swagger-docs.sh
- Run hack/update-openapi-spec.sh
- Run hack/update-gofmt.sh
Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
When calculating the scale-up/scale-down limit, the number of replicas
at the start of the scaling policy period is calculated correctly by
taken into account the number of scaled-up and scaled-down replicas.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Michaelis <38879457+oliviermichaelis@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: wangyysde <net_use@bzhy.com>
Generation swagger.json.
Use v2 path for hpa_cpu_field.
run update-codegen.sh
Signed-off-by: wangyysde <net_use@bzhy.com>
The HPA controller keeps a flat history of recommendations for
stabilization. However when both up and down scale stabilization are
configured, the interpretation of the history changes depending on the
direction of movement. What we want is to keep the stabilized
recommendation within the envelope of the minimum and maximum over
configured stabilization windows. We should only move when the
envelope forces a move.
During a Deployment update there may be more Pods in the scale target
ref status than in the spec. This test verifies that we do not scale
to the status value. Instead we should stay at the spec value.
Fails before #79035 and passes after.
Add support for scaling to zero pods
minReplicas is allowed to be zero
condition is set once
Based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/61423
set original valid condition
add scale to/from zero and invalid metric tests
Scaling up from zero pods ignores tolerance
validate metrics when minReplicas is 0
Document HPA behaviour when minReplicas is 0
Documented minReplicas field in autoscaling APIs
Add three tests for handling invalid metrics when scaling on
multiple metrics - one for scaling up successfully (new behaviour)
and two for ensuring we don't scale down (existing behaviour).
HPA will treat initial size of autoscalee to avoid hastily overriding
recomendations made by HPA (if HPA set size and then was restarted) or by user
(initial size should be treated as human-generated recommendation).
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Change CPU sample sanitization in HPA.
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Change CPU sample sanitization in HPA.
Ignore samples if:
- Pod is beeing initalized - 5 minutes from start defined by flag
- pod is unready
- pod is ready but full window of metric hasn't been colected since
transition
- Pod is initialized - 5 minutes from start defined by flag:
- Pod has never been ready after initial readiness period.
**Release notes:**
```release-note
Improve CPU sample sanitization in HPA by taking metric's freshness into account.
```
Ignore samples if:
- Pod is beeing initalized - 5 minutes from start defined by flag
- pod is unready
- pod is ready but full window of metric hasn't been colected since
transition
- Pod is initialized - 5 minutes from start defined by flag:
- Pod has never been ready after initial readiness period.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67067, 67947). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Do not count soft-deleted pods for scaling purposes in HPA controller
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The metrics of "soft-deleted" pods in general to be deleted should probably not matter for scaling purposes, since they'll be gone "soon", whether they're nodelost or just normally delete.
As long as soft-deleted pods still exist, they prevent normal scale up.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/62845
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Stop counting soft-deleted pods for scaling purposes in HPA controller to avoid soft-deleted pods incorrectly affecting scale up replica count calculation.
```
Duration of initialization taint on CPU and window of initial readiness
setting controlled by flags.
Adding API violation exceptions following example of e50340ee23
After my previous changes HPA wasn't behaving correctly in the following
situation:
- Pods use a lot of CPU during initilization, become ready right after they initialize,
- Scale up triggers,
- When new pods become ready HPA counts their usage (even though it's not related to any work that needs doing),
- Another scale up, even though existing pods can handle work, no problem.
Instead discard metric values for pods that are unready and have never
been ready (they may report misleading values, the original reason for
introducing scale up forbidden window).
Use per pod metric when pod is:
- Ready, or
- Not ready but creation timestamp and last readiness change are more
than 10s apart.
In the latter case we asume the pod was ready but later became unready.
We want to use metrics for such pods because sometimes such pods are
unready because they were getting too much load.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 60373, 61098, 61352, 61359, 61362). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Add HPA test for FailedGetExternalMetric
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Add a HPA test for missing external metrics.
**Release note**:
```
NONE
```
Previously, when `GetObjectMetricReplicas` calculated the desired
replica count, it multiplied the usage ratio by the current number of replicas.
This method caused over-scaling when there were pods that were not ready
for a long period of time. For example, if there were pods A, B, and C,
and only pod A was ready, and the usage ratio was 500%, we would
previously specify 15 pods as the desired replicas (even though really
only one pod was handling the load).
After this change, we now multiple the usage
ratio by the number of ready pods for `GetObjectMetricReplicas`.
In the example above, we'd only desire 5 replica pods.
This change gives `GetObjectMetricReplicas` the same behavior as the
other replica calculator methods. Only `GetExternalMetricReplicas` and
`GetExternalPerPodMetricRepliacs` still allow unready pods to impact the
number of desired replicas. I will fix this issue in the following
commit.
Currently, when performing a scale up, any failed pods (which can be present for example in case of evictions performed by kubelet) will be treated as unready. Unready pods are treated as if they had 0% utilization which will slow down or even block scale up.
After this change, failed pods are ignored in all calculations. This way they do not influence neither scale up nor scale down replica calculations.
