This will allow for kube-proxy to be run without `privileged` and
with only adding the capability `NET_ADMIN`.
Signed-off-by: Jess Frazelle <acidburn@microsoft.com>
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md.
Fix how to use ipvs mode by kubeadm
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
how to use ipvs mode by kubeadm
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 67694, 64973, 67902). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
SCTP support implementation for Kubernetes
**What this PR does / why we need it**: This PR adds SCTP support to Kubernetes, including Service, Endpoint, and NetworkPolicy.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#44485
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
SCTP is now supported as additional protocol (alpha) alongside TCP and UDP in Pod, Service, Endpoint, and NetworkPolicy.
```
The requested Service Protocol is checked against the supported protocols of GCE Internal LB. The supported protocols are TCP and UDP.
SCTP is not supported by OpenStack LBaaS. If SCTP is requested in a Service with type=LoadBalancer, the request is rejected. Comment style is also corrected.
SCTP is not allowed for LoadBalancer Service and for HostPort. Kube-proxy can be configured not to start listening on the host port for SCTP: see the new SCTPUserSpaceNode parameter
changed the vendor github.com/nokia/sctp to github.com/ishidawataru/sctp. I.e. from now on we use the upstream version.
netexec.go compilation fixed. Various test cases fixed
SCTP related conformance tests removed. Netexec's pod definition and Dockerfile are updated to expose the new SCTP port(8082)
SCTP related e2e test cases are removed as the e2e test systems do not support SCTP
sctp related firewall config is removed from cluster/gce/util.sh. Variable name sctp_addr is corrected to sctpAddr in pkg/proxy/ipvs/proxier.go
cluster/gce/util.sh is copied from master
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66733, 67472). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
add ut for PortPart()
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
improve ut coverage
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66491, 66587, 66856, 66657, 66923). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
optimize ipvs get nodeIP
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Optimize ipvs get nodeIP.
The original ipvs `NodeIPs` need first get all local type address to set1, then get address of dummy device `kube-ipvs0` to set2, then do diff of set1 and set2 to get local addresses we need.
This work gonna result in unnecessary resource consumption, especially for large cluster, will have lots address in dummy device `kube-ipvs0`.
This pr optimized the workaround.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
ipvs: add addrtype match for nodeport
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
before this PR:
```
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-TCP dst -j KUBE-NODE-PORT
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes service cluster ip + port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j ACCEPT
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port with externalTrafficPolicy=local" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-LOCAL-TCP dst -j RETURN
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
```
after this PR:
```
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port with externalTrafficPolicy=local" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-LOCAL-TCP dst -j RETURN
-A KUBE-NODE-PORT -p tcp -m comment --comment "Kubernetes nodeport TCP port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-NODE-PORT-TCP dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m comment --comment "Kubernetes service cluster ip + port for masquerade purpose" -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j KUBE-MARK-MASQ
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m set --match-set KUBE-CLUSTER-IP dst,dst -j ACCEPT
-A KUBE-SERVICES -m addrtype --dst-type LOCAL -j KUBE-NODE-PORT
```
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#65459
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
manually tested cases:
- ClusterIP distributed to pod on same node
- ClusterIP distributed to pod on other node
- NodePort distributed to pod on same node
- NodePort distributed to pod on other node
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66196, 67016, 66807, 67023). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix spelling mistakes
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
fix spelling mistakes
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Move the` k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/pointer` package to` k8s.io/utils/pointer`
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Move `k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/pointer` to `shared utils` directory, so that we can use it easily.
Close#66010 accidentally, and can't reopen it, so the same as #66010
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66489, 66728, 66739). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Reuse iptablesContainerPortalArgs, remove function iptablesContainerNodePortArgs
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
reuse iptablesContainerPortalArgs, remove function iptablesContainerNodePortArgs
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue. If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Document ipvs mode has GA in v1.11
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Document ipvs mode has GA in v1.11.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66138, 65951). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Don't validate HealthzBindAddress in KubeProxyConfiguration if it's empty
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/49087 added validation for
the HealthzBindAddress field in the KubeProxyConfiguration, but if you pass in
--healthz-port=0 to the kube-proxy CLI, it sets this field to the empty string.
However, an empty string is not a valid value for this field.
This change allows validation to pass if HealthzBindAddress is empty.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Ref #65118
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Fix validation for HealthzBindAddress in kube-proxy when --healthz-port is set to 0
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66136, 64999, 65425, 66120, 66074). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Not step into ipvs.CleanupLeftovers() if canUseIPVS's false
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Earlier we decide whether we should clean up the left-over ipvs rules inside `ipvs.CleanupLeftovers()`, therefore we call function `ipvs.CanUseIPVSProxier()` two times (and `GetModules()` two times). Actually no need to step into `ipvs.CleanupLeftovers()` if `canUseIPVS` is false.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66064, 66040). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
fix Local externalTrafficPolicy is not respected for ipvs NodePort
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Local externalTrafficPolicy is not respected for ipvs NodePort.
This PR fixes it.
**Which issue(s) this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged)*:
Fixes#66062
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Manually tested accessing NodePort with externalTrafficPolicy=Local and externalTrafficPolicy=Cluster.
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
These are all flagged by Go 1.11's
more accurate printf checking in go vet,
which runs as part of go test.
Lubomir I. Ivanov <neolit123@gmail.com>
applied ammend for:
pkg/cloudprovider/provivers/vsphere/nodemanager.go
