Automatic merge from submit-queue
Unable to have optional message slice
When making a message slice optional, we need to handle one more
conditional case in the rewriter.
@wojtek-t
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Generate a better Stringer method for proto types
This replaces the bad string output generated by golang/proto with gogo/protobuf stringer generation. Makes the output similar to %#v and more debuggable. We have to have a String() method to implement proto.Message, so this is strictly better.
@wojtek-t, @thockin for after your PR merges
Fixes#28756
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Allow proto tag to define field name
When we introduce a new field for backwards compatibility, we may want
to specify a different protobuf field name (one that matches JSON) than
the automatic transformation applied to the struct field. This allows an
API field to define the name of its protobuf tag.
@wojtek-t hit this while adding protobuf to OpenShift - we have fields we
keep for backward compatibility that need to be assigned a field by name.
Has no impact on existing (already tagged) fields.
When we introduce a new field for backwards compatibility, we may want
to specify a different protobuf field name (one that matches JSON) than
the automatic transformation applied to the struct field. This allows an
API field to define the name of its protobuf tag.
This means that tags like:
// +foo=bar
// +foo=bat
..will produce []string{"bar", "bat"}. This is needed for later commits which
will want to use this to make code generation more self contained.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Cleanup third party (pt 2)
Move forked-and-hacked golang code to the forked/ directory. Remove ast/build/parse code that is now in stdlib. Remove unused shell2junit
Automatic merge from submit-queue
TLS bootstrap API group (alpha)
This PR only covers the new types and related client/storage code- the vast majority of the line count is codegen. The implementation differs slightly from the current proposal document based on discussions in design thread (#20439). The controller logic and kubelet support mentioned in the proposal are forthcoming in separate requests.
I submit that #18762 ("Creating a new API group is really hard") is, if anything, understating it. I've tried to structure the commits to illustrate the process.
@mikedanese @erictune @smarterclayton @deads2k
```release-note-experimental
An alpha implementation of the the TLS bootstrap API described in docs/proposals/kubelet-tls-bootstrap.md.
```
[]()
Specifying // +protobuf.nullable=true on a Go type that is an alias of a
map or slice will generate a synthetic protobuf message with the type
name that will serialize to the wire in a way that allows the difference
between empty and nil to be recorded.
For instance:
// +protobuf.nullable=true
types OptionalMap map[string]string
will create the following message:
message OptionalMap {
map<string, string> Items = 1
}
and generate marshallers that use the presence of OptionalMap to
determine whether the map is nil (rather than Items, which protobuf
provides no way to delineate between empty and nil).
