Automatic merge from submit-queue
Rename ScheduledJobs to CronJobs
I went with @smarterclayton idea of registering named types in schema. This way we can support both the new (CronJobs) and old (ScheduledJobs) resource name. Fixes#32150.
fyi @erictune @caesarxuchao @janetkuo
Not ready yet, but getting close there...
**Release note**:
```release-note
Rename ScheduledJobs to CronJobs.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add more events to disruption controller
To provide users with information that their PDB may not be working as intended.
cc: @davidopp
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix possible race in operationNotSupportedCache
Because we can run multiple workers to delete namespaces simultaneously, the
operationNotSupportedCache needs to be guarded with a mutex to avoid concurrent
map read/write errors.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
lister-gen updates
- Remove "zz_generated." prefix from generated lister file names
- Add support for expansion interfaces
- Switch to new generated JobLister
@deads2k @liggitt @sttts @mikedanese @caesarxuchao for the lister-gen changes
@soltysh @deads2k for the informer / job controller changes
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove GetRootContext method from VolumeHost interface
Remove the `GetRootContext` call from the `VolumeHost` interface, since Kubernetes no longer needs to know the SELinux context of the Kubelet directory.
Per #33951 and #35127.
Depends on #33663; only the last commit is relevant to this PR.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Update how we detect overlapping deployments
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you:
1. If this is your first time, read our contributor guidelines https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md and developer guide https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/development.md
2. If you want *faster* PR reviews, read how: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/faster_reviews.md
3. Follow the instructions for writing a release note: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/docs/devel/pull-requests.md#release-notes
-->
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#24152
**Special notes for your reviewer**: cc @kubernetes/deployment
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
```release-note
NONE
```
When looking for overlapping deployments, we should also find other deployments that select current deployment's pods,
not just the ones whose pods are selected by current deployment.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Controller changes for perma failed deployments
This PR adds support for reporting failed deployments based on a timeout
parameter defined in the spec. If there is no progress for the amount
of time defined as progressDeadlineSeconds then the deployment will be
marked as failed by a Progressing condition with a ProgressDeadlineExceeded
reason.
Follow-up to https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/19343
Docs at kubernetes/kubernetes.github.io#1337
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/14519
@kubernetes/deployment @smarterclayton
Because we can run multiple workers to delete namespaces simultaneously, the
operationNotSupportedCache needs to be guarded with a mutex to avoid concurrent
map read/write errors.
This commit adds support for failing deployments based on a timeout
parameter defined in the spec. If there is no progress for the amount
of time defined as progressDeadlineSeconds then the deployment will be
marked as failed by adding a condition with a ProgressDeadlineExceeded
reason in it. Progress in the context of a deployment means the creation
or adoption of a new replica set, scaling up new pods, and scaling down
old pods.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Fix how we iterate over active jobs when removing them for Replace policy
When fixing the Replace Active removal I used wrong for loop construct which panics :/ This PR fixes that by using for range.
@janetkuo ptal
@jessfraz this will also be a cherry-pick candidate for 1.4, I remember we've picked the aforementioned fix as well
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Set reason and message on Pod during nodecontroller eviction
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Pods which are evicted by the nodecontroller due to network partition, or unresponsive kubelet should be differentiated from termination initiated by other sources. The reason/message are consumed by kubectl to provide a better summary using get/describe.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#35725
**Release note**:
```release-note
Pods that are terminating due to eviction by the nodecontroller (typically due to unresponsive kubelet, or network partition) now surface in `kubectl get` output
as being in state "Unknown", along with a longer description in `kubectl describe` output.
```
Pods which are evicted by the nodecontroller due to network
malfunction, or unresponsive kubelet should be differentiated
from termination initiated by other sources. The reason/message
are consumed by kubectl to provide a better summary using get/describe.
When looking for overlapping deployments, we should also find other deployments that select current deployment's pods,
not just the ones whose pods are selected by current deployment.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Making the pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized annotation optional in PetSet pods
**What this PR does / why we need it**: As of now, the absence of the annotation `pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized` in PetSets causes the PetSet controller to effectively "pause". Being a debug hook, users expect that its absence has no effect on the working of a PetSet. This PR inverts the logic so that we let the PetSet controller operate as expected in the absence of the annotation.
Letting the annotation remain alpha seems ok. Renaming it to something more meaningful needs further discussion.
**Which issue this PR fixes** _(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)_: fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/35498
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
``` release-note
The annotation "pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized" on StatefulSets (formerly PetSets) is now optional and only encouraged for debug use.
```
cc @erictune @smarterclayton @bprashanth @kubernetes/sig-apps
@kow3ns The examples will need to be cleaned up as well I think later on to remove them.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Node controller to not force delete pods
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/35145
- [x] e2e tests to test Petset, RC, Job.
- [x] Remove and cover other locations where we force-delete pods within the NodeController.
**Release note**:
<!-- Steps to write your release note:
1. Use the release-note-* labels to set the release note state (if you have access)
2. Enter your extended release note in the below block; leaving it blank means using the PR title as the release note. If no release note is required, just write `NONE`.
-->
``` release-note
Node controller no longer force-deletes pods from the api-server.
* For StatefulSet (previously PetSet), this change means creation of replacement pods is blocked until old pods are definitely not running (indicated either by the kubelet returning from partitioned state, or deletion of the Node object, or deletion of the instance in the cloud provider, or force deletion of the pod from the api-server). This has the desirable outcome of "fencing" to prevent "split brain" scenarios.
* For all other existing controllers except StatefulSet , this has no effect on the ability of the controller to replace pods because the controllers do not reuse pod names (they use generate-name).
* User-written controllers that reuse names of pod objects should evaluate this change.
```
