Automatic merge from submit-queue
remove redundant param in e2e_node/remote
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
* remove redundant param in e2e_node/remote/remote.go
* fix a small typo
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
None
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49316, 46117, 49064, 48073, 49323)
Test Ubuntu image using GKE image spec on master
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46891
This PR changes the files referenced in test-infra for running Ubuntu image tests against GKE system spec on master.
The two properties files are shared by the tests against all k8s branches but the `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME` is only available on master. This should be fine because the tests in the non master branches will just ignore the unknown env variable.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/assign @yujuhong
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48377, 48940, 49144, 49062, 49148)
Add cos-dev-61-9733-0-0 to the benchmark tests
Ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/42926
m60 has docker 1.13.1 while m61 has 17.03. This PR adds m61 to the benchmark tests so that we will have more data to compare.
PS: We will support fetching the latest image in an image family in the node e2e tests in the future.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/assign @yujuhong
/cc @kewu1992 @abgworrall
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48890, 46893, 48872, 48896)
Support customized system spec in the node conformance test and create the GKE system spec
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46891
- System specs are located in `test/e2e_node/system/specs`. Created one for validating GKE images in `test/e2e_node/system/specs/gke.yaml`.
- `--image-spec-name` can be used to specify a system spec in node e2e and conformance tests. This option maps to `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME` in a test properties file, which is the user facing configuration. So, users can specify `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME=gke` to run the image validation using the GKE system spec.
- If `SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME` is unspecified, the default spec (`system.DefaultSysSpec`) will be used.
- We can also use `make test-e2e-node SYSTEM_SPEC_NAME=gke` to run tests using GKE image spec.
**Release note**:
`None`
Automatic merge from submit-queue
add dockershim checkpoint node e2e test
Add a bunch of disruptive cases to test kubelet/dockershim's checkpoint work flow.
Some steps are quite hacky. Not sure if there is better ways to do things.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48698, 48712, 48516, 48734, 48735)
Name change: s/timstclair/tallclair/
I changed my name, and I'm migrating my user name to be consistent.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46865, 48661, 48598, 48658, 48614)
Move metrics_grabbert to test/e2e
cc @aleksandra-malinowska
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Changes node e2e tests to use the new Ubuntu image
ref: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/46891
`ubuntu-docker10` and `ubuntu-docker12` images are deprecated in favor of the new one.
**Release note**:
```
None
```
/sig node
/area node-e2e
/assign @dchen1107
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 48074, 47971, 48044, 47514, 47647)
e2e: bump kubelet's resurce usage limit
We don't have per-OS image limits. Bumping these to more generous
numbers to not fail the tests.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47993, 47892, 47591, 47469, 47845)
Bump up npd version to v0.4.1
```
Bump up npd version to v0.4.1
```
Fixes#47219
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47922, 47195, 47241, 47095, 47401)
Run cAdvisor on the same interface as kubelet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
cAdvisor currently binds to all interfaces. Currently the only
solution is to use iptables to block access to the port. We
are better off making cAdvisor to bind to the interface that
kubelet uses for better security.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Fixes#11710
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
cAdvisor binds only to the interface that kubelet is running on instead of all interfaces.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46327, 47166)
mark --network-plugin-dir deprecated for kubelet
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
**Which issue this PR fixes** : fixes#43967
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 47530, 47679)
Use cos-stable-59-9460-64-0 instead of cos-beta-59-9460-20-0.
Remove dead code that has now moved to another repo as part of #47467
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
/sig node
- It contains a fix for ipaliasing.
- It contains a fix which decouples GPU driver installation from kernel
version.
Remove dead code that has now moved to another repo as part of #47467
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Shorten eviction tests, and increase test suite timeout
After #43590, the eviction manager is less aggressive when evicting pods. Because of that, many runs in the flaky suite time out.
To shorten the inode eviction test, I have lowered the eviction threshold.
To shorten the allocatable eviction test, I now set KubeReserved = NodeMemoryCapacity - 200Mb, so that any pod using 200Mb will be evicted. This shortens this test from 40 minutes, to 10 minutes.
While this should be enough to not hit the flaky suite timeout anymore, it is better to keep lower individual test timeouts than a lower suite timeout, since hitting the suite timeout means that even successful test runs are not reported.
/assign @Random-Liu @mtaufen
issue: #31362
When no nvidia device was attached, the -ne check had a syntax error:
sh: -ne: argument expected
This resulted in 'Success' being echoed and the test passing incorrectly.
This was found while debugging issue #47216