Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40855, 40859)
PV binding: send an event when there are no PVs to bind
This is similar to scheduler that says "no nodes available to schedule pods"
when it can't schedule a pod.
@kubernetes/sig-storage-pr-reviews
This fix prevents the PV controller from forcefully overwriting the provisioned volume's name with the generated PV name. Instead, it allows dynamic provisioner implementers to set the name of the volume to a value that they choose.
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39064, 40294)
Refactor persistent volume tests
This is an attempt to make the binder tests a bit more concise. The PVCs are being created by a "templating" function. There is also a handful of PVs in the tests but those vary quite more and I don't think similar approach would save us much code.
Reference:
https://reviewable.kubernetes.io/reviews/kubernetes/kubernetes/29006#-KPJuVeDE0O6TvDP9jia
@jsafrane: I hope this is what you have on mind.
PV controller should not use Controller.Requeue, as as it is not available in
shared informers. We need to implement our own work queues instead where we
can enqueue volumes/claims as we want.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/controller
cc @jsafrane @mikedanese @bprashanth @derekwaynecarr @thockin @saad-ali
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone **lgtms** and then someone
experienced in the project **approves**), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
## If You Care About the Process:
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
perfectly: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
## TLDR:
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the OWNERS file to add
the names of people that should be reviewing code in the future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify the **approvers** section.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an approver or reviewer
of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver of the subdirectories too, so not all
OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38377, 36365, 36648, 37691, 38339)
Exponential back off when volume delete fails
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR implements ability in pv_controller to back off when deleting a volume fails from plugin API.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*:
Partly fixes#38295 , but I think volume delete is most problematic thing happening in pv_controller without any sort of backoff.
After this change the attempts of volume deletion look like:
```
controller : I1208 00:18:35.532061 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:20:50.578325 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:23:05.563488 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:25:20.599158 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:27:35.560009 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:29:50.594967 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:32:05.539168 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
controller : I1208 00:34:20.581665 16388 aws_util.go:55] Error deleting EBS Disk volume aws://us-east-1d/vol-abcdefg: VolumeInUse: Volume vol-abcdefg is currently attached to i-1234567
```
This implements pv_controller to exponentially backoff
when deleting a volume fails in Cloud API. It ensures that
we aren't making too many calls to Cloud API
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37608, 37103, 37320, 37607, 37678)
Fix issue #37377: Report an event on successful PVC provisioning
This is a simple patch to fix the issue #37377: On a successful PVC provisioning an event is emitted so it's clear the provisioning actually succeeded.
cc: @jsafrane
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Implement external provisioning proposal
In other words, add "provisioned-by" annotation to all PVCs that should be provisioned dynamically.
Most of the changes are actually in tests.
@kubernetes/sig-storage
Gluster provisioner is interested in pvc.Namespace and I don't want to add
at as a new field in VolumeOptions - it would contain almost whole PVC.
Let's pass direct reference to PVC instead and let the provisioner to pick
information it is interested in.
