Automatic merge from submit-queue
Adapt loadbalancer deleting/updating when using cloudprovider openstack in openstack/liberty
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Make an extra verification on the returned listeners and pools because gophercloud query doesn't filter the results by loadbalancerID / listenerID respectively when using **openstack/librerty**.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
#33759
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
#33759 it's supposed to have a pull request which fixes this problem but in the release 1.5 loadbalancers doesn't use that patched code.
**Release note**:
NONE
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Initialize cloud providers with a K8s clientBuilder
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR provides each cloud provider the ability to generate kubernetes clients. Either the full access or service account client builder is passed from the controller manager. Cloud providers could need to retrieve information from the cluster that isn't provided through defined interfaces, and this seems more preferable to adding parameters.
Please leave your thoughts/comments.
**Release note**:
```release-note
NONE
```
When volume's status is 'attaching', its attachments will be None,
controllermanager can't get device path and make some failed event.
But it is normal, let's fix it.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Statefulsets for cinder: allow multi-AZ deployments, spread pods across zones
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Currently if we do not specify availability zone in cinder storageclass, the cinder is provisioned to zone called nova. However, like mentioned in issue, we have situation that we want spread statefulset across 3 different zones. Currently this is not possible with statefulsets and cinder storageclass. In this new solution, if we leave it empty the algorithm will choose the zone for the cinder drive similar style like in aws and gce storageclass solutions.
**Which issue this PR fixes** fixes#44735
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
example:
```
kind: StorageClass
apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1beta1
metadata:
name: all
provisioner: kubernetes.io/cinder
---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
annotations:
service.alpha.kubernetes.io/tolerate-unready-endpoints: "true"
name: galera
labels:
app: mysql
spec:
ports:
- port: 3306
name: mysql
clusterIP: None
selector:
app: mysql
---
apiVersion: apps/v1beta1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: mysql
spec:
serviceName: "galera"
replicas: 3
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: mysql
annotations:
pod.alpha.kubernetes.io/initialized: "true"
spec:
containers:
- name: mysql
image: adfinissygroup/k8s-mariadb-galera-centos:v002
imagePullPolicy: Always
ports:
- containerPort: 3306
name: mysql
- containerPort: 4444
name: sst
- containerPort: 4567
name: replication
- containerPort: 4568
name: ist
volumeMounts:
- name: storage
mountPath: /data
readinessProbe:
exec:
command:
- /usr/share/container-scripts/mysql/readiness-probe.sh
initialDelaySeconds: 15
timeoutSeconds: 5
env:
- name: POD_NAMESPACE
valueFrom:
fieldRef:
apiVersion: v1
fieldPath: metadata.namespace
volumeClaimTemplates:
- metadata:
name: storage
annotations:
volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-class: all
spec:
accessModes: [ "ReadWriteOnce" ]
resources:
requests:
storage: 12Gi
```
If this example is deployed it will automatically create one replica per AZ. This helps us a lot making HA databases.
Current storageclass for cinder is not perfect in case of statefulsets. Lets assume that cinder storageclass is defined to be in zone called nova, but because labels are not added to pv - pods can be started in any zone. The problem is that at least in our openstack it is not possible to use cinder drive located in zone x from zone y. However, should we have possibility to choose between cross-zone cinder mounts or not? Imo it is not good way of doing things that they mount volume from another zone where the pod is located(means more network traffic between zones)? What you think? Current new solution does not allow that anymore (should we have possibility to allow it? it means removing the labels from pv).
There might be some things that needs to be fixed still in this release and I need help for that. Some parts of the code is not perfect.
Issues what i am thinking about (I need some help for these):
1) Can everybody see in openstack what AZ their servers are? Can there be like access policy that do not show that? If AZ is not found from server specs, I have no idea how the code behaves.
2) In GetAllZones() function, is it really needed to make new serviceclient using openstack.NewComputeV2 or could I somehow use existing one
3) This fetches all servers from some openstack tenant(project). However, in some cases kubernetes is maybe deployed only to specific zone. If kube servers are located for instance in zone 1, and then there are another servers in same tenant in zone 2. There might be usecase that cinder drive is provisioned to zone-2 but it cannot start pod, because kubernetes does not have any nodes in zone-2. Could we have better way to fetch kubernetes nodes zones? Currently that information is not added to kubernetes node labels automatically in openstack (which should I think). I have added those labels manually to nodes. If that zone information is not added to nodes, the new solution does not start stateful pods at all, because it cannot target pods.
cc @rootfs @anguslees @jsafrane
```release-note
Default behaviour in cinder storageclass is changed. If availability is not specified, the zone is chosen by algorithm. It makes possible to spread stateful pods across many zones.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Use provided VipPortID for OpenStack LB
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
When creating an OpenStack LoadBalancer, Kubernetes will search through the tenant trying to match the LB's VIP with a port. This is problematic because multiple ports may have the same fixed IP, therefore leading to routing inconsistencies. We should use the port ID provided by the LB's response body instead.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43909
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Since this involves non-deterministic testing, it'd be best if we can run this in a staging environment for a few days before merging (say until early next week).
**Release note**:
```release-note
Fixes issue during LB creation where ports where incorrectly assigned to a floating IP
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
cinder: Add support for the KVM virtio-scsi driver
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
The VirtIO SCSI driver for KVM changes the way disks appear in /dev/disk/by-id.
This adds support for the new format.
Without this, volume attaching on an openstack cluster using this kvm driver doesn't work
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Does this need e2e tests? I couldn't find anywhere to add another openstack configuration used in the e2e tests.
Wiki page about this: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Virtio-scsi-for-bdm
**Release note**:
```release-note
cinder: Add support for the KVM virtio-scsi driver
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 44555, 44238)
openstack: remove field flavor_to_resource
I believe there is no usage about `flavor_to_resource`, and I think there is no need to build that information, too.
cc @anguslees
**Release note:**
```
NONE
```
The cloudprovider is being refactored out of kubernetes core. This is being
done by moving all the cloud-specific calls from kube-apiserver, kubelet and
kube-controller-manager into a separately maintained binary(by vendors) called
cloud-controller-manager. The Kubelet relies on the cloudprovider to detect information
about the node that it is running on. Some of the cloudproviders worked by
querying local information to obtain this information. In the new world of things,
local information cannot be relied on, since cloud-controller-manager will not
run on every node. Only one active instance of it will be run in the cluster.
Today, all calls to the cloudprovider are based on the nodename. Nodenames are
unqiue within the kubernetes cluster, but generally not unique within the cloud.
This model of addressing nodes by nodename will not work in the future because
local services cannot be queried to uniquely identify a node in the cloud. Therefore,
I propose that we perform all cloudprovider calls based on ProviderID. This ID is
a unique identifier for identifying a node on an external database (such as
the instanceID in aws cloud).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40932, 41896, 41815, 41309, 41628)
Add custom CA file to openstack cloud provider config
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Adds ability to specify custom CA bundle file to verify OpenStack endpoint against. Useful in tests and PoC deployments. Similar to what https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35488 did for authentication.
**Which issue this PR fixes**: None
**Special notes for your reviewer**: Based on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35488 which added support for custom CA file for authentication.
**Release note**:
This change migrates the 'openstack' provider and 'keystone'
authenticator plugin to the newer gophercloud/gophercloud library.
Note the 'rackspace' provider still uses rackspace/gophercloud.
Fixes#30404
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40297, 41285, 41211, 41243, 39735)
fix variables in openstack.go to keep camel casing and remove unused var
In cases where insecure OpenStack endpoint is to be used
(e.g., when testing), gophercloud will fail to connect
to such endpoints. This patch adds support for custom CA
file configuration option, which, when provided, will
make gophercloud validate OpenStack endpoint against
certificate(s) read from file specified in that option.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/cloudprovider
cc @runseb @justinsb @kerneltime @mikedanese @svanharmelen @anguslees @brendandburns @abrarshivani @imkin @luomiao @colemickens @ngtuna @dagnello @abithap
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
This method has been unused by k8s for some time, and yet is the last
piece of the cloud provider API that encourages provider names to be
human-friendly strings (this method applies a regex to instance names).
Actually removing this deprecated method is part of a long effort to
migrate from instance names to instance IDs in at least the OpenStack
provider plugin.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
openstack: Implement the `Routes` provider API
``` release-note
Implement the Routes provider API for OpenStack using Neutron extraroute extension. This removes the need for flannel/etc where supported. To use, ensure all your nodes are on the same Neutron (private) network and specify the router ID in new `[Route]` section of provider config:
[Route]
router-id = <router UUID>
```
This change implements the Routes API using Neutron's "extraroute"
extension.
To use, this requires all the nodes to be on the same Neutron network
and the UUID of the Neutron router on that network.
Required cloud provider config section:
[Route]
router-id = <UUID of Neutron router>
Ensure kube-controllermanager is started with (non-default)
`--allocate-node-cidrs=true` and set `--cluster-cidr` to the POD
super-subnet (a private /16 would be reasonable).
Based on an earlier version by @timbyr (#19473)
