Automatic merge from submit-queue
Conversionlint
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This PR adds a comment placeholder for the exported or public functions in conversion generator files. Such functions without a comment results into golint failure in various generated files. The changes in this patch takes care of about 36 related lint failures.
Given below is an example lint error,
zz_generated.conversion.go:91:1: exported function Convert_v1alpha1_Binding_To_servicecatalog_Binding should have comment or be unexported
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
Considering minor changes no issue is created.
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
Hello, I am trying to fix golint failures as we see them in the kubernetes-incubator/service-catalog project. I have separate PRs opened for lint issues related to other generator code which are in separate libraries like gengo. Thanks!
**Release note**:
```release-note
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add tests for semantically equal DaemonSet updates
Tests for #43337, depends on #43337. The last commit is already reviewed in #43337.
@liggitt @kargakis @lukaszo @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews
The exported or public functions requires a doc comment to pass golint.
This commit has changes of conversion generated code. The actual doc
changes are added into a separate commit for a clean review.
Automatic merge from submit-queue
validate activeDeadlineSeconds in rs/rc
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
if setting activeDeadlineSeconds, deployment will continuously created new pods after old pod dies.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes#38684
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
ActiveDeadlineSeconds is validated in workload controllers now, make sure it's not set anywhere (it shouldn't be set by default and having it set means your controller will restart the Pods at some point)
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Disable readyReplicas validation for Deployments
Because there is no field in 1.5, when we update to 1.6 and the
controller tries to update the Deployment, it will be denied by
validation because the pre-existing availableReplicas field is greater
than readyReplicas (normally readyReplicas should always be greater or
equal).
Fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/43392
@kubernetes/sig-apps-bugs
Because there is no field in 1.5, when we update to 1.6 and the
controller tries to update the Deployment, it will be denied by
validation because the pre-existing availableReplicas field is greater
than readyReplicas (normally readyReplicas should always be greater or
equal).
1. Validate that templateGeneration is increased when and only when template is changed
2. Validate that templateGeneration is never decreased
3. Added validation tests for templateGeneration
4. Fix a bunch of errors in validate tests, for example, all validation test error cases failed
on lack of resource version, or on name changes, not on the real validation we wanted to test
- Add a new type PortworxVolumeSource
- Implement the kubernetes volume plugin for Portworx Volumes under pkg/volume/portworx
- The Portworx Volume Driver uses the libopenstorage/openstorage specifications and apis for volume operations.
Changes for k8s configuration and examples for portworx volumes.
- Add PortworxVolume hooks in kubectl, kube-controller-manager and validation.
- Add a README for PortworxVolume usage as PVs, PVCs and StorageClass.
- Add example spec files
Handle code review comments.
- Modified READMEs to incorporate to suggestions.
- Add a test for ReadWriteMany access mode.
- Use util.UnmountPath in TearDown.
- Add ReadOnly flag to PortworxVolumeSource
- Use hostname:port instead of unix sockets
- Delete the mount dir in TearDown.
- Fix link issue in persistentvolumes README
- In unit test check for mountpath after Setup is done.
- Add PVC Claim Name as a Portworx Volume Label
Generated code and documentation.
- Updated swagger spec
- Updated api-reference docs
- Updated generated code under pkg/api/v1
Godeps update for Portworx Volume Driver
- Adds github.com/libopenstorage/openstorage
- Adds go.pedge.io/pb/go/google/protobuf
- Updates Godep Licenses
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42106, 42094, 42069, 42098, 41852)
Fix availableReplicas validation
An available replica is a ready replica, not the other way around
@kubernetes/sig-apps-bugs caught while testing https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42097
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 40497, 39769, 40554, 40569, 40597)
NetworkPolicy validation improvements
I noticed while implementing NetworkPolicy that I we weren't validating the "Ports" field at all.
The docs are actually completely silent about what a string-valued Port field is supposed to mean. I had guessed it meant to call `net.LookupPort()` on it (ie, map it from /etc/services) but in every other case where we have an IntOrString-valued Port field in an API struct, it refers to a named ContainerPort. But that would be extremely awkward to implement in this case; a policy specifying a named port could end up mapping to a different numeric port on every container in the namespace... Do other people actually implement string-valued ports that way? Or, for that matter, implement string-valued ports at all? (Related: I hadn't noticed until now that you can leave the Port value unspecified, allowing you to say "allow to all UDP ports, but no TCP ports" or "allow to all TCP ports, but no UDP ports". That seems like something that ended up in the spec just because it was possible, not because it was actually useful...)
@kubernetes/sig-network-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 37845, 39439, 39514, 39457, 38866)
Move watch/versioned to pkg/apis/meta/v1/watch.go
Watch is a part of the server API
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 39466, 39490, 39527)
bump gengo to latest
bumping gengo to limit surprises while working on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/39475
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38920, 38090)
Improve error message for name/label validation.
Instead of just providing regex in name/label validation error output, we need to add the naming rules of the name/label, which is more end-user readable.
Fixed#37654
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 35300, 36709, 37643, 37813, 37697)
Add generated informers
Add informer-gen and the informers it generates. We'll do follow-up PRs to convert everything currently using the hand-written informers to the generated ones.
TODO:
- [x] switch to `GroupVersionResource`
- [x] finish godoc
@deads2k @caesarxuchao @sttts @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Remove ExportOptions from api/internal and use unversioned
Should only have one internal object in use
Part of #37530
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Curating Owners: pkg/apis
cc @lavalamp @smarterclayton @erictune @thockin @bgrant0607
In an effort to expand the existing pool of reviewers and establish a
two-tiered review process (first someone lgtms and then someone
experienced in the project approves), we are adding new reviewers to
existing owners files.
If You Care About the Process:
------------------------------
We did this by algorithmically figuring out who’s contributed code to
the project and in what directories. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work
well: people that have made mechanical code changes (e.g change the
copyright header across all directories) end up as reviewers in lots of
places.
Instead of using pure commit data, we generated an excessively large
list of reviewers and pruned based on all time commit data, recent
commit data and review data (number of PRs commented on).
At this point we have a decent list of reviewers, but it needs one last
pass for fine tuning.
Also, see https://github.com/kubernetes/contrib/issues/1389.
TLDR:
-----
As an owner of a sig/directory and a leader of the project, here’s what
we need from you:
1. Use PR https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/35715 as an example.
2. The pull-request is made editable, please edit the `OWNERS` file to
remove the names of people that shouldn't be reviewing code in the
future in the **reviewers** section. You probably do NOT need to modify
the **approvers** section. Names asre sorted by relevance, using some
secret statistics.
3. Notify me if you want some OWNERS file to be removed. Being an
approver or reviewer of a parent directory makes you a reviewer/approver
of the subdirectories too, so not all OWNERS files may be necessary.
4. Please use ALIAS if you want to use the same list of people over and
over again (don't hesitate to ask me for help, or use the pull-request
above as an example)
