Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 49284, 49555, 47639, 49526, 49724)
Add clusterroles for approving CSRs easily
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
Adds ClusterRoles for CSR approving. Currently consumers like kubeadm and GKE have to create these rules by themselves, but are doing it slightly differently which leads to sprawl. Instead, the ClusterRoles are created by core, and the actual bindings created by respective deployment method.
**Which issue this PR fixes** *(optional, in `fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)` format, will close that issue when PR gets merged)*: fixes #
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/48191
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
The API Server now automatically creates RBAC ClusterRoles for CSR approving.
Each deployment method should bind users/groups to the ClusterRoles if they are using this feature.
```
cc @kubernetes/sig-auth-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Add namespaced role to inspect particular configmap for delegated authentication
Builds on https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41814 and https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41922 (those are already lgtm'ed) with the ultimate goal of making an extension API server zero-config for "normal" authentication cases.
This part creates a namespace role in `kube-system` that can *only* look the configmap which gives the delegated authentication check. When a cluster-admin grants the SA running the extension API server the power to run delegated authentication checks, he should also bind this role in this namespace.
@sttts Should we add a flag to aggregated API servers to indicate they want to look this up so they can crashloop on startup? The alternative is sometimes having it and sometimes not. I guess we could try to key on explicit "disable front-proxy" which may make more sense.
@kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc
@ncdc I spoke to @liggitt about this before he left and he was ok in concept. Can you take a look at the details?
Automatic merge from submit-queue
redact detailed errors from healthz and expose in default policy
Makes `/healthz` less sensitive and exposes it by default.
@kubernetes/sig-auth-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-misc @liggitt
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 41667, 41820, 40910, 41645, 41361)
Switch admission to use shared informers
Originally part of #40097
cc @smarterclayton @derekwaynecarr @deads2k @liggitt @sttts @gmarek @wojtek-t @timothysc @lavalamp @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
move kube-dns to a separate service account
Switches the kubedns addon to run as a separate service account so that we can subdivide RBAC permission for it. The RBAC permissions will need a little more refinement which I'm expecting to find in https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/38626 .
@cjcullen @kubernetes/sig-auth since this is directly related to enabling RBAC with subdivided permissions
@thockin @kubernetes/sig-network since this directly affects now kubedns is added.
```release-note
`kube-dns` now runs using a separate `system:serviceaccount:kube-system:kube-dns` service account which is automatically bound to the correct RBAC permissions.
```
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Make controller-manager resilient to stale serviceaccount tokens
Now that the controller manager is spinning up controller loops using service accounts, we need to be more proactive in making sure the clients will actually work.
Future additional work:
* make a controller that reaps invalid service account tokens (c.f. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/20165)
* allow updating the client held by a controller with a new token while the controller is running (c.f. https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/4672)
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Switch resourcequota controller to shared informers
Originally part of #40097
I have had some issues with this change in the past, when I updated `pkg/quota` to use the new informers while `pkg/controller/resourcequota` remained on the old informers. In this PR, both are switched to using the new informers. The issues in the past were lots of flakey test failures in the ResourceQuota e2es, where it would randomly fail to see deletions and handle replenishment. I am hoping that now that everything here is consistently using the new informers, there won't be any more of these flakes, but it's something to keep an eye out for.
I also think `pkg/controller/resourcequota` could be cleaned up. I don't think there's really any need for `replenishment_controller.go` any more since it's no longer running individual controllers per kind to replenish. It instead just uses the shared informer and adds event handlers to it. But maybe we do that in a follow up.
cc @derekwaynecarr @smarterclayton @wojtek-t @deads2k @sttts @liggitt @timothysc @kubernetes/sig-scalability-pr-reviews
Automatic merge from submit-queue
give nodes update/delete permissions
delete permission is logically paired with create permission (and is used during self-registration scenarios when a node has been restarted and an existing node object has a mismatched externalID)
we already need to scope update nodes/status permission to only let a node update itself, and we would scope these at the same time.
fixes https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/41224
Automatic merge from submit-queue
Include "ingresses" resource in RBAC bootstrap roles
The bootstrap RBAC roles "admin", "edit", and "view" should all be able to apply their respective access verbs to the "ingresses" resource in order to facilitate both publishing Ingress resources (for
service administrators) and consuming them (for ingress controllers).
Note that I alphabetized the resources listed in the role definitions that I changed to make it easier to decide later where to insert new entries. The original order looked like it may have started out alphabetized, but lost its way. If I missed an intended order there, please advise.
I am uncertain whether this change deserves mention in a release note, given the RBAC feature's alpha state. Regardless, it's possible that a cluster administrator could have been happy with the previous set of permissions afforded by these roles, and would be surprised to discover that bound subjects can now control _Ingress_ resources. However, in order to be afflicted, that administrator would have had to have applied these role definitions again which, if I understand it, would be a deliberate act, as bootstrapping should only occur once in a given cluster.
The bootstrap RBAC roles "admin", "edit", and "view" should all be
able to apply their respective access verbs to the "ingresses"
resource in order to facilitate both publishing Ingress resources (for
service administrators) and consuming them (for ingress controllers).
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 38212, 38792, 39641, 36390, 39005)
Allow node-controller to update node status
ref: #39639
* adds required permissions to node-controller
* fixes typo in role name for pod-garbage-collector role
* adds event watching permissions to persistent volume controller
* adds event permissions to node proxier
