When the client misses a delete event from the watcher, it will use the last state of the pod in the informer cache to produce a delete event. At that point, it's not clear if the pod was in the queues or the cache, so we should issue a deletion in both.
The pod could be assumed, so deletion of assumed pods from the cache should work.
Change-Id: I11ce9785de603924fc121fe2fa6ed5cb1e16922f
kubernetes#60525 introduced
Balanced attached node volumes feature gate to include volume
count for prioritizing nodes. The reason for introducing this
flag was its usefulness in Red Hat OpenShift Online environment
which is not being used any more. So, removing the flag
as it helps in maintainability of the scheduler code base
as mentioned at kubernetes#101489 (comment)
* Rename const for topology.../zone
* Rename const for topology.../region
* Rename const for failure-domain.../zone
* Rename const for failure-domain.../region
* Restore old names for compat
This is a performance optimization that reduces the overhead of inter-pod affinity PreFilter calculaitons. Basically
eliminates that overhead when no pods in the cluster use required pod anti-affinity. This offered 20% improvement on 5k clusters for preferred anti-affinity benchmarks.
This commit transforms the next() function of the scheduler node
tree into a listNodes() function that directly returns a list of
nodes, going through the zones in a round-robin fashion. This
removes the flawed logic of the next() function.
The apiserver is expected to send pod deletion events that might arrive at a different time. However, sometimes a node could be recreated without its pods being deleted.
Partial revert of https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/86964
Signed-off-by: Aldo Culquicondor <acondor@google.com>
Change-Id: I51f683e5f05689b711c81ebff34e7118b5337571
When create fake data for the nodeTree unittests, The 'append' is invoked
on the common fake data set. That makes the unittests is running with unexpected
fake data after that.
When nodes are added in multiple zones at once, the nodeTree next
function does not return a correct list of nodes but repeats some
This commit resets the index before starting to call next() to
prevent this issue
Special thanks to igraecao for the help in finding the bug
Co-authored-by: igraecao <matvej.yolli@outlook.com>
