The controller needs to be able to set a service's finalizers to be
able to create an EndpointSlice resource that is owned by the service
and sets blockOwnerDeletion=true in its ownerRef.
At times, for some reason endpoint/service creation can fail in a setup. As we
currently create endpoint/service after volume creation, later we need rollback
of this volume transaction if endpoint/service creation failed. Considering
endpoint/service creation is light weight, this patch promote endpoint/service
creation to an early stage.
Signed-off-by: Humble Chirammal <hchiramm@redhat.com>
- Move from the old github.com/golang/glog to k8s.io/klog
- klog as explicit InitFlags() so we add them as necessary
- we update the other repositories that we vendor that made a similar
change from glog to klog
* github.com/kubernetes/repo-infra
* k8s.io/gengo/
* k8s.io/kube-openapi/
* github.com/google/cadvisor
- Entirely remove all references to glog
- Fix some tests by explicit InitFlags in their init() methods
Change-Id: I92db545ff36fcec83afe98f550c9e630098b3135
After K8s 1.10 is upgraded to K8s 1.11 finalizer [kubernetes.io/pvc-protection] is added to PVCs
because StorageObjectInUseProtection feature will be GA in K8s 1.11.
However, when K8s 1.11 is downgraded to K8s 1.10 and the StorageObjectInUseProtection feature is disabled
the finalizers remain in the PVCs and as pvc-protection-controller is not started in K8s 1.10 finalizers
are not removed automatically from deleted PVCs and that's why deleted PVC are not removed from the system
but remain in Terminating phase.
The same applies to pv-protection-controller and [kubernetes.io/pvc-protection] finalizer in PVs.
That's why pvc-protection-controller is always started because the pvc-protection-controller removes finalizers
from PVCs automatically when a PVC is not in active use by a pod.
Also the pv-protection-controller is always started to remove finalizers from PVs automatically when a PV is not
Bound to a PVC.
Related issue: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/60764
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 52147, 54309). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions <a href="https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/cherry-picks.md">here</a>.
Update bootstrap policy with replicaset/daemonset permissions in the apps API group
Resolves#54310
Bootstrap policy was not updated when replicasets and daemonsets got promoted to the apps group
```release-note
Resolves forbidden error when accessing replicasets and daemonsets via the apps API group
```
Since we weren't running the HPA with metrics REST clients by default,
we had no bootstrap policy enabling the HPA controller to talk to the
metrics APIs.
This adds permissions for the HPA controller to talk list
pods.metrics.k8s.io, and list any resource in custom.metrics.k8s.io.
Implements history utilities for ControllerRevision in the controller/history package
StatefulSetStatus now has additional fields for consistency with DaemonSet and Deployment
StatefulSetStatus.Replicas now represents the current number of createdPods and StatefulSetStatus.ReadyReplicas is the current number of ready Pods
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 46734, 46810, 46759, 46259, 46771)
Added node to persistent-volume-binder clusterrole
**What this PR does / why we need it**: Added missing permission to volume-binder clusterrole
**Which issue this PR fixes**: fixes#46770
**Special notes for your reviewer**: Non
**Release note**: Non
1. Create controllerrevisions (history) and label pods with template
hash for both RollingUpdate and OnDelete update strategy
2. Clean up old, non-live history based on revisionHistoryLimit
3. Remove duplicate controllerrevisions (the ones with the same template)
and relabel their pods
4. Update RBAC to allow DaemonSet controller to manage
controllerrevisions
5. In DaemonSet controller unit tests, create new pods with hash labels
Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 42177, 42176, 44721)
Job: Respect ControllerRef
**What this PR does / why we need it**:
This is part of the completion of the [ControllerRef](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/controller-ref.md) proposal. It brings Job into full compliance with ControllerRef. See the individual commit messages for details.
**Which issue this PR fixes**:
This ensures that Job does not fight with other controllers over control of Pods.
Ref: #24433
**Special notes for your reviewer**:
**Release note**:
```release-note
Job controller now respects ControllerRef to avoid fighting over Pods.
```
cc @erictune @kubernetes/sig-apps-pr-reviews