The admission cache may take longer to see both ingress classes
than it takes to create the ingress. We must loop until we see
the appropriate error, cleaning up after ourselves as we go.
Don't set a connection deadline for reading, because the read operation will
fail if no data is reaceived after the deadline, and will not keep the
connection in the close_wait status.
the e2e TCP CLOSE_WAIT has to create a server pod and then, from
a client, it creates a connection but doesn't notify the server
when closing it, so it stays on the CLOSE_WAIT status until it
times out.
Current test use a simple timeout for waiting the that server pod
is ready, it's better to use WaitForPodsReady for waiting that
the pod is available to avoid problems on busy environments like
the CI.
It also deletes the pods once the tests finish to avoid leaking
pods.
There were several sshPort values in e2e test packages because
we've migrated code from e2e framework by copying and pastting.
This adds common SSHPort on e2essh package to reduce such duplicated
code.
it turns out that the e2e test was not using the timeout used to
hold the CLOSE_WAIT status, hence the test was flake depending
on how fast it checked the conntrack table.
This PR replaces the dependency on ssh using a pod to check the conntrack
entries on the host in a loop, to make the test more robust
and reduce the flakiness due to race conditions and/or ssh issues.
It also fixes a bug trying to grep the conntrack entry, where
the error was swallowed if a conntrack entry wasn't found.
Sometimes the pod has already been cleaned up by the time the test
tried to grab the logs.
Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting for client-a-jt4tf to complete.
Mar 27 16:19:38.066: INFO: Waiting up to 5m0s for pod "client-a-jt4tf" in namespace "e2e-network-policy-c-9007" to be "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:38.072: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 6.270302ms
Mar 27 16:19:40.078: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Pending", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 2.01233019s
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf": Phase="Succeeded", Reason="", readiness=false. Elapsed: 4.020186873s
STEP: Saw pod success
Mar 27 16:19:42.086: INFO: Pod "client-a-jt4tf" satisfied condition "success or failure"
Mar 27 16:19:42.093: FAIL: Error getting container logs: the server could not find the requested resource (get pods client-a-jt4tf)
Full Stack Trace
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.checkNoConnectivity(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0xc001666400, 0xc000c32000)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1457 +0x2a0
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.testCannotConnect(0xc00104adc0, 0xc0016b82c0, 0x55587e9, 0x8, 0xc000c32000, 0x50)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:1406 +0x1fc
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network.glob..func13.2.7()
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/network_policy.go:285 +0x883
github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo.(*TestOptions).Run(0xc001e47830, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo/cmd_runtest.go:59 +0x41f
main.newRunTestCommand.func1(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b70, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:238 +0x15d
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30, 0x1, 0x1, 0xc00121b900, 0xc001e50b30)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:826 +0x460
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x60d2d00, 0x9887ec8)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:914 +0x2fb
github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/github.com/spf13/cobra/command.go:864
main.main.func1(0xc00121b180, 0x0, 0x0)
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:59 +0x9c
main.main()
/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:60 +0x341
STEP: Cleaning up the pod client-a-jt4tf
STEP: Cleaning up the policy.
RestartControllerManager() is kube-controller specific function
and it is better to separate the function as subpackage of e2e
test framework.
In addition, the function made invalid dependency into e2essh.
So this separates the function into e2ekubesystem subpackage.
The function is called from e2e/network test only, so this moves
the function into the test for reducing e2e/framework/util.go code
and removing invalid dependency on e2e test framework.
and they made an invalid dependency to sub e2e framework from the core framework.
So we can use e2epod.WaitTimeoutForPodReadyInNamespace to remove invalid dependency.
The main purpose of this pr is to handle the framework core package dependency subpackage pod.
